It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by soficrow
reply to post by LiveForever8
You are referring to treaties that pre-date current International Trade and Corporate Law, and which arguably are now obsolete. As in replaced.
...VERY important consideration.
The Outer Space Treaty represents the basic legal framework of International Space Law, which is completely separate from International Law. That is my understanding of the situation.
Another point worth considering is how exactly would one 'police' outer space? Corporations could be getting up to all sorts out there without anyone being any the wiser... After all, in space...nobody can hear you scream
Originally posted by Fiberx
reply to post by LiveForever8
Of all the issues with the Obama administration, this one is my biggest.
Derailing the renewal of our Moon program was an epic miscalculation. They replaced it with the idea that we would go to the asteroid belt. Asteroids are all good and well. They contain large amounts of precious and rare metals and gases that we could make use of, largely for profit. I feel that connecting profit with it, however, makes this a mission for the private sector.
Our government should be looking at developing a base of operations on the Moon
Originally posted by Fiberx
reply to post by soficrow
No, that's incorrect. Bush proposed the return to the Moon, Obama's Administration ended it.
One link for the story of many. Obama also announced the idea for a new mission to land a human on an asteroid.
"The Outer Space Treaty provides a legal framework for the international use of space for peaceful purposes... "
who does own the moon?