It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

NEW Graphic Analysis on the Videos of UFO's over KUMBURGAZ, TURKEY w/ ET Pics

page: 12
135
<< 9  10  11    13  14  15 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Dec, 18 2010 @ 02:52 PM
link   

Originally posted by BrnBdry
And finally, the only time cruise ships anchor that close to shore is when there is an excursion where people get off the ship and go on smaller boats to take them to shore, because there is no docks for the ship to dock. And that only happens durring the day time. NEVER at night. Night time is STRICTLY reserved for traveling.


Well the problem with your rebuttal is that it is full of holes.

First of all the ships DO have a dock (see below)

Second the angle of the 'UFO' matches perfectly with the angle of the bridge of a docked ship (see below)

Third the windows where the Capt is ARE dark on the UFO, what you see lit is the header of the bridge, most likely by sun. The time stamps are all wrong on the tapes so it is likely it was filmed at dawn or dusk

Fourth... the 'UFO' is at the same spot at the same angle, three years in a row... Most likely because the date he is taking pictures is when the ship is not out cruising





posted on Dec, 19 2010 @ 12:12 AM
link   


Funny how people like Zorgon, found the brief instance in the video where the object looks like something else, and are focusing on that 'face in the cloud' as the basis of their complete argument.

Also, the dude that posted the debunk video cunningly said the dog was barking cause there was a person swimming. Yet the dog wasnt in the video clip where the guy was swimming. He was however barking when no one was swimming. Then he suggests the dog was taking orders from his master when he turns back to the camera. yet his master was clearly in the process of speaking when the dog turned back, and wasnt giving any orders to the dog.

If I look close enough at the still Zorgon is fixated on, I swaer I see a chefs hat.

Also, what about the glowing orange lights that form a half circle. What part of the ship is that? And why did all the other lights on the ship get turned off exactly durring that part of the video in your opinion Zorgon?

Continue to enlighten us.



posted on Dec, 19 2010 @ 12:24 AM
link   
reply to post by zorgon
 


I dunno..the shoe kinda seems to fit here:

www.abovetopsecret.com...



posted on Dec, 19 2010 @ 01:16 AM
link   

Originally posted by BrnBdry
Funny how people like Zorgon, found the brief instance in the video where the object looks like something else, and are focusing on that 'face in the cloud' as the basis of their complete argument.



Also, what about the glowing orange lights that form a half circle. What part of the ship is that? And why did all the other lights on the ship get turned off exactly durring that part of the video in your opinion Zorgon?

Continue to enlighten us.


Well one thing about 'people like me' I don't just buy any old video and say "yep, that is a UFO" The fact that it is at the same angle, and there three years in a row and no one else has any pictures of it... the fact that he lives on the beach with lots of boats available... and he never thought of getting closer?

Believe what you wish... these are not UFO's and they are not flying... nothing could hover at the exact same spot several years in a row

As to the orange lights, haven't bothered to look... they look like flames.. I would have to see if there is an oil refinery or oil rig in the area... just like the Mexican UFO's that the Mex military chased



posted on Dec, 19 2010 @ 01:24 AM
link   

Originally posted by Chadwickus
reply to post by zorgon
 


I dunno..the shoe kinda seems to fit here:

www.abovetopsecret.com...


Gadzooks!!! Yet another thread? Your right though, sadly. I was hoping not but it explains why he had the original footage of this...

UFO releases intelligent moving spheres!! First ever video footage!
www.abovetopsecret.com...

and wouldn't share it with us... and it explains this post...

www.abovetopsecret.com...

Pity... that changes the ball game



posted on Dec, 19 2010 @ 01:40 AM
link   
reply to post by zorgon
 


So what you are saying is, because it happened 3 years in a row, on the same date each year, is basis enough for you to call it a cruise ship? Wow.

How do you know the person filming this deosnt go there on vacation the same time each year?

Cruise ships are not metalic in color. Cruise ships ar not round. Cruise ships dont have glowing orange orbs that hover in a circular formation. Cruise ships dont have sliding doors on the tippidy top of the ship that open up for the view. Cruis ships are well lit at night. Cruise ships dont anchor at night.

What is metalic in color, round, with glowing floating orange orbs, a viewing door ontop, that isnt well lit, and seems to hover? Nothing I can think of. Nothing I can identify. Some sort of unidentified object in my opinion.

When you do look into those orange orbs you seemed to not notice, let me go ahead and stop you, and state that they are not identifying ship markers, or lights on poles so planes dont fly into it or anything like that.



posted on Dec, 19 2010 @ 04:33 AM
link   

Originally posted by BrnBdry
So what you are saying is, because it happened 3 years in a row, on the same date each year, is basis enough for you to call it a cruise ship? Wow.


What I am saying that BECAUSE it happened three years in a row to find a UFO in the same spot at the same angle that no one else is seeing means it is something that is always there and not an Alien spaceship




How do you know the person filming this deosnt go there on vacation the same time each year?


Whether he lives there or visits there every year is irrelevant... it still doesn't account for the same 'UFO' being in the same spot every time he is there.

You may be happy calling anything odd looking an Alien spacecraft. Me, I need to eliminate the obvious hoaxes in order to study it properly. Unlike the hoaxers, I am not making any income at this
Unfortunately these days the number of hoaxes, CGI and misidentified objects is burying any really good observations.



Cruise ships are not metalic in color. Cruise ships ar not round.


Well the PART of the ship that you see as a UFO matches pretty close to that bridge.
Angle curve levels all match.. How do you explain that?



Cruise ships dont have glowing orange orbs that hover in a circular formation.


Hmmm how do you know they are hovering? Looks more like a mirage to me... I see em all the time out here in the desert. I will see if I can find some flame sources along that sighting path tomorrow
BTW I notice he didn't spend very long filming that one... was sorta just in passing...

Now show me the reports of others that saw the glowing orange lights.... seems to me such an awesome sighting would look even better if you were closer... and there are a lot of people along that coast



Cruise ships dont have sliding doors on the tippidy top of the ship that open up for the view


Neither do UFO's well none that I have ever seen in 30+ years. You still haven't explained the logic of the same tilted angle, the fact that it doesn't move, and the fact that it is back in the same spot every year.



Cruise ships are well lit at night. Cruise ships dont anchor at night.


Of course they anchor at night... when they are not on a cruise. I bet the reason he catches em every year about the same time is that its an off season period and they are all in port. Now your just being silly

:shk:




What is metalic in color, round, with glowing floating orange orbs, a viewing door ontop, that isnt well lit, and seems to hover? Nothing I can think of. Nothing I can identify. Some sort of unidentified object in my opinion.


"Seems" to hover... now your getting it
And the orange lights have nothing at all to do with the other objects



When you do look into those orange orbs you seemed to not notice, let me go ahead and stop you, and state that they are not identifying ship markers, or lights on poles so planes dont fly into it or anything like that.


You just said they were nothing you can identify, yet you can say what they are not?
To me they look exactly like blow off flames from an oil rig or refinery. Don't know yet if they are... but that is exactly what they look like. There are many vids on youtube that show just that

Here is one close up... Imagine them in the distance at dusk





posted on Dec, 19 2010 @ 04:59 AM
link   

Originally posted by zorgon

Originally posted by alfafox


Hello antibren and dear members,

I would like to invite you to take a look at my investigation theories page,
(NO ADDS, NO COMMERCIALS, NO POPPING UP SELLING OFFERS)
also at the top of the page is the missing link from this OP


www.alcione.org...

Kind regards
Cap. Alejandro Franz


You make this statement on your site..
www.alcione.org...
I assume you can prove this beyond a doubt?

Hello zorgon,

You are asking about something inside my work which is off topic, nevertheless
you assume right, yes, beyond ANY doubt. I can see you didn't read the full
information located below the picture from this individual in the refered page.
Here are some examples from this perverse and invidious person:

Excerpt:

Real Ufos In Mexico Disclosure By Air Force
"The alleged Cantarell Oil Fields story is a proved hoax invented by this eccentric old man
named Alejandro Franz Navarrete, formely pilot and despised by the mexican pilots,
exposed everywhere as a hoaxer who claims all the 17 years of UFO sightings in Mexico
are hoaxes including those from airline pilots, military, air traffic controllers, in one word
everyone. A mentally disturbed individual that should be taken as it is, a clown."

www.abovetopsecret.com...

Could this be the Best UFO Footage Ever? (Clear Video of UFO)
"Of course now the eccentric mexican clown named Alejandro Franz Navarrete is
furious.....
This pathetic paranoid individual named Alejandro Franz Navarrete said the same
things about the mexican Air Force people, the DOD staff and Secretary of Defense
himself because he decided to give the UFO disclosure to the world.

This mexican parasite named Alejandro Franz Navarrete also said similar things
about all those mexican commercial pilots who reported UFO sightings saying all
of them are a bunch of fools and hoaxers."

www.abovetopsecret.com...

From the above you can see I was defamed so I suggest the following:

References about the Mexican Airline Pilots Union (A.S.P.A.) where anyone
is free to ask about Capt. Alejandro Franz's trayectory since 1981 to date.
www.aspa.org.mx...
prensa@aspa.org.mx

References about the Mexican Airline Pilots Colegiate where anyone
is free to ask about Capt. Alejandro Franz's trayectory since 1981 to date.
www.colegiodepilotos.org.mx...
pilotos@colegiodepilotos.org.mx

References about Aeromexico where anyone is free to ask about
Capt. Alejandro Franz's trayectory since 1981 to date.
www.aeromexico.com.mx...
jefaturadepilotos@aeromexico.com.mx

**** **** **** **** **** **** ****
Real Ufos In Mexico Disclosure By Air Force
Ted Roe, Executive Director of NARCAP (National Aviation Reporting Center on Anomalous Phenomena) intervened in another member's reply:

"Captain Franz, whom free-spirit defames in his posting is one of the more careful and experienced researchers I have met. He knows what is at stake if we fail to be very careful and critical about what we take away from case investigations. He has looked very carefully at some very famous Mexican cases and has come away unconvinced by many of them. At the same time, he knows UAP exist, he has seen them, and he knows that there are many authentic examples to engage. We both agree that focusing on cases because of notoriety, cases that fail the researchers test - broken evidenciary chain of custody, objective first person analysis, etc - does not serve the effort."
www.abovetopsecret.com...

Capt. Alejandro Franz's statement since 1998 at alcione.org site
"I believe in the possibility of existence of intelligent extraterrestrial beings
who apparently are navigating with challenge their vehicles in our atmosphere or
in space and whose real origin is unknown, but based on the anomalous behavior
in various visible evidences shown and officially documented by several countries
they have demonstrated a superior technology which allows us to think that those
intelligent beings are aliens to Planet Earth" -- Alejandro Franz

(My résumé) www.alcione.org...

Best UFO cases:

Mexican Air Force march 05-2004 FLIR's video lights or UFO's?
www.alcione.org...
AEROMEXICO'S AIRPLANE COLLIDED WITH A UFO BEFORE LANDING IN 1994?
www.alcione.org...
NEW YORK UFO VIDEO JULY 24th 2000. Real or fake?
www.alcione.org...





Santiago Yturria Garza
A CYBER "GANGSTER" and "TROLL"
Jaime Maussán's partner and associate
in the most shameful scammer UFO business


Santiago Yturria Garza aka free_spirit

A rancorous and frustrated embittered individual, a coward "gangster"
at Jaime Maussán's service who defamed Capt. Alejandro Franz at many
places like Radio programs, conferences, TV shows, video interviews,
and several times anonymously using many pseudonyms like free_spirit
in the forum Abovetopsecret because he was and still is incapable to
demonstrate nothing against the Oil Well Flames Theory of the famous
"UFO's" sighting of March 05, 2004 where the Mexican Air Force personnel
as the RADAR and FLIR operator's did many infamous recognition mistakes.


I apologize for the off topic explanation above and will
never answer again on this matter in this thread.

Regards to you and all.
.



posted on Dec, 19 2010 @ 07:17 AM
link   
reply to post by alfafox
 
A character reference from Narcap's Ted Roe is as good as it gets in my opinion. He's a great guy.



posted on Dec, 19 2010 @ 01:42 PM
link   
Oh naff naff naff,i click on op link & i get this...........[IMG" target="_blank" class="postlink" rel="nofollow">img828.imageshack.us...[/IMG]]


WTF is up with that......please?



posted on Dec, 19 2010 @ 03:31 PM
link   
reply to post by antibren
 


ive seen this and its fakes as he@@. it looks like a toy near a black curtain



posted on Dec, 19 2010 @ 07:01 PM
link   

Originally posted by fotsyfots
Oh naff naff naff,i click on op link & i get this.......... >

WTF is up with that......please?


The page was canceled due to heavy traffic.

I suggest this: go to Google in your browser, in the search window
type this URL complete (without dashes):

---www.archivosovni.com/analisis-kumburgaz/kumburgaz-ingles.htm---

After re directed look for the cache on the URL that shows this title:

ANALYSIS ON THE VIDEOS REGARDING UFO's FILMED IN TURKEY

Then you should see the archived page.

Try this other URL from the hoaxer HAKTAN AKDOGAN that was posted
in the SIRIUS UFO Forum.

SIRIUS UFO KUMBURGAZ
ANALYSED BY MARIO VALDES SANTIAGO - CHILE


Regards
.



posted on Dec, 19 2010 @ 10:40 PM
link   
Zorgon, cruise ships don't anchor at night out at sea, no matter how bad you want too belive they do. Also, there are no off seasons for cruise ships either, no matter how bad you want too believe there is.

Finally, if for some strange reason a cruise company decided to take a season off from earning money, and as odd as it would be, anchor out at sea,... they sure as hell wouldn't do it next to an oiling station.

I'm not trying to convince you it's an alien space craft by no means. I am however trying help you see that it's not a cruise ship. Cause it's clearly not.
edit on 19-12-2010 by BrnBdry because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 20 2010 @ 12:04 AM
link   
reply to post by BrnBdry
 


It's not out at sea though, it's been determined that the object being filmed appeared to be just off the coast.



posted on Dec, 20 2010 @ 12:06 AM
link   
reply to post by antibren
 


Pretty interesting stuff!



posted on Dec, 20 2010 @ 02:57 PM
link   
LoL Guys. It looks like a plastic toy. look at how you go from one video to a sudden close up. the video was cut so you could see the starship enterprise. it doesnt look real at all. i believe UFOs exist but this is a joke



posted on Dec, 23 2010 @ 10:51 AM
link   
Um.. that's the prow of a cruise ship?


Where is the rest of the ship? Where are the rest of the lights? If you look up pictures of ships docked at night (which of course, is usually at port.. not in the middle of the ocean), there are plenty of lights along the length of the ship. Not just a few lit at the prow.

While this may have a mundane explanation, I'm disappointed with the feeble reasoning put forth so far in trying to explain it. Yachts? Prows of cruise ships? C'mon.. can do better than that, can't you? And most of the videos were clearly taken at night, with the moon quite visible. The one they took at dusk (or dawn) was obviously so.

lmgtfy.com...

Third picture is the closest I can find to the ones in the video - and they are not even close. They are obviously ON the water. The ones in the video are not. Look at the others. Go ahead and find me a magical cruise ship where only the prow is visible, and the rest of the ship is not. You'll need to do better than finding a DAY picture of a ship, and then trying to superimpose a curved shape over the prow. Yes.. lots of things have a curved shape to them. Doesn't magically make this the correct explanation to this video.
edit on 23-12-2010 by fleabit because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 23 2010 @ 06:39 PM
link   
ITS A PLASTIC TOY. IT DOESNT EVEN PASS THE GIGGLE TEST



posted on Dec, 25 2010 @ 09:49 PM
link   
reply to post by surfnow2
 

If you think the issue is as simple as that ... could demonstrate in a concrete way please? should be easy to prove that it is a plastic toy, please do, everyone will appreciate it very much.



posted on Dec, 26 2010 @ 06:52 PM
link   
reply to post by archivosovnis
 


look at the video, just look at it. it looks like someone is behind a black curtain holding a toy in front of it. use your eyes and look again. how does a video go from day to night instantaneously?????



new topics

top topics



 
135
<< 9  10  11    13  14  15 >>

log in

join