AboveTopSecret.com Video and Media Portal.Books, posters, and more.T-shirts, mouse pads, cups, and bags.Member podcasts.Conspiracy theory wiki.Alternative news headlinesBelowTopSecret.com - off topic and general chit chat.AboveTopSecret.com - conspiracy theories and


 

 

This topic is in the Secret Societies discussion forum.  (rss)


War 3-18 is 4444 days since the start of Gulf War 1




Topic started on 17-3-2003 @ 04:49 PM by Ycon


Following Freemason protocols of Cabalistic numbers and insulting God, Jesus, Goodness and love, the announcement of war, the 18th of March 2003,
is precisely 4444 days from January 16th 1991 the start of Desert Storm, the reason being that there are 4444 occasions the word 'god' is found in the King James Bible. Freemasonry, a Lucifer worshipping cult, takes every opportunity to honour its god Lucifer by slapping God in the face with acts of extreme violence against innocent people.



   copyright & usage 
Click here for more Secret Societies topics
Hot Topics   |   Top Topics   |   This Week   |   Subscribe   |   Home


reply posted on 17-3-2003 @ 05:00 PM by arc


hahahaha not that Ycon is biased in any way, no

why would a cult who worship lucifer have a bible present in their meeting hall? where is your proof of this? Are you refering to the Lucifer mentioned by Albert Pike and have you read the explanation of why he mentions Lucifer and what they actually symbolise.

interesting things numbers though, although I wouldn't call them evil. Apparently bible has lots of references to symbolic numbers



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 17-3-2003 @ 05:06 PM by All Seeing Eye


The Bible in the Mason's hall is only there as a insult to God.



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 17-3-2003 @ 05:09 PM by arc


so why does one of the conditions of becoming a mason involve having a personal belief in God?

is that because you can't insult what you don't believe in?



   copyright & usage 
AboveTopSecret.com is advertising supported.


reply posted on 17-3-2003 @ 10:40 PM by rahboni


I usually don't take the time to respond to such garbage as Ycon has posted, but this is ridiculous and inflamatory.

I as a Mason pledged responsibility to all mankind on the Bible, in the name of God.

I as a Mason re-iterated my belief in God by swearing such on the bible.

I as a Mason pledged to do my best to help others in distress, if in my power to do so.

Nowhere and nohow, in the years I have been a Mason, have the ideals discussed and presented to me in the course of my duties towards mankind, as a member of the Fraternity, were in breach or contradiction with my ideals and responsibilities to the Church.

The very idea that Satan or Lucifer has any bearing to my life in the Lodge is a fiction perpetrated by zealots that cannot understand being righteous beyond the Church.

Shriners' burn hospitals are Satanic?
Scottish Rite hospitals are Satanic?
The York Rite's work with the Blind is Satanic?
The blue lodge's support of the young people in the community via scholarships and such is Satanic?



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 18-3-2003 @ 12:30 AM by Ycon


Oh no not another mason

ATS posts hit 44,444 on 3-18-3 at 12:16 am CST by the All Seeing Eye


Rahboni, they just banned a mason from here today, I hope you have more control over your responses then he did.



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 18-3-2003 @ 12:40 AM by arc


well I'm not even a mason and I stand by what rahboni said.

if anything his response was a lot more controlled than your hysterical outpouring. I can guess which mason was banned and doubt it was because he was one.



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 18-3-2003 @ 12:52 AM by Ycon


Hey Arc, maybe if you get the hair out of your eyes you can see right. I didn't say he was banned because he was a mason, did I? I said I hope that Rahboni has better control of his responses then the other mason had.

Oh and Rahboni, not all degrees or groups of masons are satanic lucifer lovers.



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 18-3-2003 @ 01:12 AM by arc


obviously a mason goes through 33 degrees often over many years, with his spiritual beliefs intact and then suddenly enters a secret degree and becomes a satanist?

even doing a cousin IT impression, that sure doesn't make much sense or logic



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 18-3-2003 @ 01:40 AM by Ycon


No No No Arc, get the hair out of your eyes and your mood is starting to show

Did I say that? Arc if you want start a arguement, lets take it to secret societies.



   copyright & usage 
AboveTopSecret.com is advertising supported.


reply posted on 18-3-2003 @ 10:48 AM by arc


maybe that is where you should have posted it in the first place.

my mood is cool - I'm just counteracting your claims with some logic. If you find that argumentative then that is your decision. I notice all you can defend yourself with is comments on my avatar

Plus its now 16.49 GMT, so you have 7 hours and 10 minutes for your initial point to be proven correct

[Edited on 18-3-2003 by arc]



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 18-3-2003 @ 04:28 PM by abstract_alao


who did they ban?



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 18-3-2003 @ 04:32 PM by rahboni


Freemason was banned...



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 18-3-2003 @ 04:35 PM by observer


My guess is Hammerite AKA Freemason



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 19-3-2003 @ 12:26 PM by arc


If Hammerite got banned why does his member status say Member and not Banned?

Ycon I took the hairbear avatar down and you've still not justified any of your wild accusations



   copyright & usage 


























































ATS Server: www3.theabovenetwork.com
Powered by AboveTop:Board v2.3
Header data processed in 0.002 seconds
Page processed in 0.072 seconds
6 total database queries (1)

(:)








The Above Top Secret Conspiracy Community Web site is a wholly owned social content community of The Above Network, LLC.

This content community relies on user-generated content from our member contributors.
The opinions of our members are not those of site ownershipwho maintains
strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides a collaborative venue for free expression.






It looks like you're using some kind of software designed to block advertising while surfing our site.

We work very hard to provide an efficient Internet presence that services over 200,000 daily visits from people and automated web spiders. A large web site like this, that can handle that amount of traffic, is increasingly expensive to operate. Our only viable source of revenue (for now) are the ads displayed on each page.

If you enjoy our content, please enable our domain in your ad-blocking package.

more information       contact us

[hide this message]