Originally posted by ChaosMagician
I don't know, but even humans should be able to relate to the idea of giving respect to it's mother... the one who provided for and revealed answers
to the curious child. If we refuse to listen how will we hear the warnings of her wrath? As a child, don't we learn from our mothers first... and
then learn about and create ourselves? Or isn't that how it should be?... but maybe it's not, maybe we just run wild and not listen and live a life
of mistakes, learn from them and find ourselves in the process and look back and think how we should have listened.
Lovely empassioned post
She (I will allow gender for your benefit), is not our mother, she did not give us life. She doesn't speak to us, she has no voice. She has no
wrath. She is oblivious in the same way as the fetus in the womb, or as we are of all the parasites that live on our skin and the bacteria in our
gut. All the she is aware of is the 'whole'. Therefore, her 'wrath' shows when she needs to make adjustments, a volcanic eruption, seismic
shifts, tectonic movements, are all about her ensuring that the conditions are optimum for her, as a whole, to survive. What gives US life is the
symbient relationship she holds with the Sun and the Moon (primarily). Without those two, all of us, her included, cannot survive. All three of US
are inextricable linked in LIFE. We, she and us, are their child, whom they nurture. And, possibly, gender was created so that they could touch.
But perhaps I am drifting a little into romance, but traditional Chinese storytelling in particular promotes that view and I like it.
I was listening to a discussion programme on the radio some months ago regarding the problem of climate change, or rather the problem of communicating
the scale of the problem to the 'masses' and one of the panelists explained that it is like going back to Ancient Egypt and asking those people,
5000 years ago or so, to care about us. What we do right now will have an enormous impact on the future, we are on a slippery slope, but we can still
turn this around. But, it is a long haul in terms of re-education and some are more progressive than others.
In the UK, the situation is more stark, we are a small island with very limited resources, we cannot sustain our population in the medium to long term
unless we change. Almost all of children's programming produced by the BBC has an environmental theme. Kids are now telling their parents not to
use the car, not to drop litter, to recycle. Mine is anyway, but I only let my child watch domestic TV channels, because the stuff that they are
producing in the US is almost consistently encouraging children to disrespect their parents (which in most cases are absent or stupid), that what you
own is paramount to who you are, and to take because you want it. Similarly in schools their are initiatives to compost waste, to recycle, to learn
how to grow your own produce, so there is some hope. On the reverse of that though, current government cuts have severed completely funding towards
projects that promote sustainability and biodiversity. So two steps forward, one step back, towards a better future.
Either way, in the UK, we are fortunate in that we have a drive to reduce not only carbon emissions but at the same time almost nothing is being done
to encourage more people to support local businesses and producers, but because of the former, private enterprise is to some extent cutting that path.
Unless we support them though, it will have little effect. I am on a very limited income, all of my income goes on basic sustenance, if I have any
'disposable income' I spend it largely on my child. It is easy for me therefore. I, wherever possible, shop second hand or in charity shops, I use
my local greengrocer, butcher and baker. I produce one sack of landfill rubbish every four weeks, the rest is recycled, or composted. I don't buy
much in the way of mass produced, processed or imported goods, if it wasn't for the gas and electric that I still have to use, my carbon footprint
would be quite small. We should all be moving towards that for the sake of the generations to come, but most don't care about the generations to
come, even many of those who have children don't care. And that is the long haul.
In terms of climate change, we in the west will not suffer too much for a very, very long time, but in other areas, where erosion has irreversible
damaged reefs, the next El Nino could be devastating. Those reefs sustain a population of around five million people. Over night those people will
be without the resources to support themselves, and then what happens? We will all complain when they land on our doorstep cap in hand because we
have and they don't, and it was the activities of the west that caused that erosion.
I don't worry about the planet, as such, I worry about the exploitation of resources, including human, that leads to the death and destruction of
other lifeforms, but the planet will prosper without us and it will be our own fault if we go extinct, I just wish we didn't have to take all the
lovely animals and trees and planets along with us, we deserve extinction, they don't. So, I feel disappointment more than anything that we don't
realise that we are all in this together, and that if we stopped buying the # that these corporations produce they would have to produce the things
that we do want. Back to natural law I say, including natural economics, and if that means the high jump for us, then nature knows best. Loving the
planet is all very nice, but if we loved each other it would be much, much greater than that and a really leap forward.