It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.


Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.


Wikileaks, really leaks!

page: 1

log in


posted on Dec, 10 2010 @ 02:22 PM
What really leaks

How the controlling interests of power are leaking information Why is Julian Assange and Company via Wikileaks, blowing information all over the place that seems to be genuine? And further more what is the absolute goal of such an endeavour. Could it be Globalists using and funding the operation to a very ugly conclusion? Or is it a Counter Intelligence Program? And why do the Bilderbergs still fit into this wonderfull story?

The conspiracy itself is not the information

No the conspiracy is about the man, Julian Assange self proclaimed Man of revelation. Also quite a bit hacker. And somewhat weird character. So weird that most of the hacker communities in the world are in a mixed state into actually going against him or standing behind him. A lot of them think there is something fishy and is just not right not only with the man but the way things are hapenning. Even within the inner circle, it has been evident of some involvement from CIA.

Now on the other hand another question from my deeply paranoid and secret agent man head of mine asks : What the heck is keeping this guy alive? Why is he still breathing and talking and continuing into dissiminating information to the people. Presidents, Civil Rights movements leaders and even rock star with enough momentum in the past have made a smaller contribution worldwide, and have often met the same faith. The silver Bullet. At the time I started to right this text, Julian has not been caught. It was also very important to me that the guy was still free and giving interviews, wich is perticular considering the ammount of information and cables that were destroyed.

Now this guy has been either walking on eggs, or has been a very high informant for some intelligence community. Just look at the profil. The guy is a pathetic looser. (sorry for being so judgemental) Appart from hacking this guy has nothing further he has achieved but having a kid. That is my opinion is very very odd. (seriously seems to me as being quite untrue)

So he is what I like to call a blank page. Too blank If we believe what wikipedia tells us, there is nothing special about this person. Even so, there is nothing that would even show us that he would be able to joust the combined efforts of all the 3 letter agencies that are “activilly searching for him”. People that have nothing in life can run and hide from these agencies for a little while, but not those with a familly. Trust me his familly would be in danger.

Reading about how they eventually find out were you are from when you make a mistake and exploit it, he is in no point different. And why would a blank page be able to so covertly swing beneath reach. Even though there is nothing to prove that he is hiding from anything, since you can see him publicly on tv and interviews and everything in between. No something does not add up in the context of secrecy and leaking information. It is done in a very bizzare manner.

No, the only way something like that can happen, is either A he has an insurrance policy, (that he did mention a little while back, a few days ago if memmory serves) or B he is part of something they call Cointelpro. Since he has now been jailed , he is to be extradited out of England and back to Sweden. But there is nothing coming out of the united States looking towards bringing Assange to justice. I believe they call what he has done : TREASON. Depending on what state he is tried in, usually that means the death penalty. But have you heard of anything like that? No of course not. The conduit of information must remain intact, and his place must solidify. What better then an arranged jailement from CIA extremist female agent and then the next day letting the person completelly off of the hook?

Since option A has been allready investigated, time and again, It is time for me to get my hands dirty into the conspiracy of the sudden leaks of wikileaks. Now bear in mind that some of this information might allready be available and writen in another matter on long posts, but I felt I needed to make this into one entire story, for easy reference.

Counter Intelligence

Central Intellegence Agency Operations, Nationnal Security

Let us investigate the meaning of Cointelpro

I took the liberty of pasting in the important part that you need to be aware of.

FBI records show that 85% of COINTELPRO resources targeted groups and individuals that the FBI deemed "subversive,"[4] including communist and socialist organizations; organizations and individuals associated with the civil rights movement, including Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. and others associated with the Southern Christian Leadership Conference, the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People, and the Congress of Racial Equality and other civil rights organizations; black nationalist groups; the American Indian Movement; a broad range of organizations labeled "New Left", including Students for a Democratic Society and the Weathermen; almost all groups protesting the Vietnam War, as well as individual student demonstrators with no group affiliation; the National Lawyers Guild; organizations and individuals associated with the women's rights movement; nationalist groups such as those seeking "independence for Puerto Rico" and a United Ireland; and additional notable Americans, such as Dr. Albert Einstein. The remaining 15% of COINTELPRO resources were expended to marginalize and subvert "white hate groups," including the Ku Klux Klan and National States' Rights Party.[5]

With such clarity in the scope of the organisation that is “Aimed at surveilling, infiltrating, discrediting and disrupting domestic political organisations.”one can but wonder why? And who is behind such an organisation that supports and encourages what is illegal in nature. Yes because if you read it correctly; it was often “illegal in nature”. Must be someone with high interests and someone that wanted to keep tabs on everyone. But who wants to know that much information. Your governement? Why would they need that much information? There are some ties that seem to indicate a type of shadow governement run down by ultra rich famillies that have secretly taken over the entire system. There is no other way of saying this; it is all part of the plan. This plan is to destabilize relations.
This has since 9/11 become of majestic proportions as FEMA agencies and Homeland Security under no surveillance of their own, can watch, read , and interact in any way they can with you and others. This is like giving a crackhead a baseball bat, some money and a few grenades. You know something bad is going to come out of it.
Now the cointelpro part of this Wikileaks investigation is to simply make you understand how this type of misinformation is meant to bring chaos to all the parties that can be victims of the internationnal cables being severed . Do not even think that such things can happen in such a way that somebody can get famous out of it and still living to tell about it. That is not how the intelligence community works.

Secrets Leaked within established Firewalls

Now peace between nations, holds on internationnal secrecy. And since we are all human beings and our systems are far from flawless everyone has deep secrets when it comes to politics and power structures. And the fact that some information stays classified and that some others are diffused is the way things work for now. (might be a long time before that changes so don’t hold your breath) But further from discrediting the current power structure, what has wikileaks accomplished? It has brought nothing but doubt. Even former members mention the possibility of a CIA conduit within the organisation.

2007 John Young, operator of Cryptome, left his position on the WikiLeaks Board of Directors accusing the group of being a "CIA conduit." Young subsequently retreated from his assertion but has continued to be critical of the site

Okay scary a bit, Let’s see if there is another connection to the CIA organisation and assange

Paul Joseph Watson
December 7, 2010
Wikileaks founder Julian Assange’s arrest over the dubious rape and molestation claims of two Swedish women is likely a political stunt, after it was revealed that one of the women has connections to the CIA and is a militant feminist who published a guide on how to get revenge on men and make them “suffer”.

Okay so we have two different sources, maybe not so credible, but still confirming suspected activity with CIA connexions . Now there have been some world wide coverage of the leaked information. This is highly unregular. Every single source of informational media is directly owned in money by the same group of elitists trying to bring in a one world governement and population reduction. All of these media companies are owned by members of the bilderbergs. Name it, you have it. So leaking information that would want to be supressed, please have no doubt, they will make it unavailable. But that is not the case with Wikileaks. The coverage has been everywhere. So something is fishy about this.

There is something to say about civil unrest, and about how something as releasing diplomatic cables could effect the relationships between governements, its people etc. And I am sorry to say this, but not everybody can understand how things really work in this world. And big and prestigious companies, are never really clean. They always have dirt. If something is leaked, it always profits somebody. Always.

And either Assange is a peon , and he does not see what is really going on, Or he is a willing player since the bilderbergs, Are behind the financing of such an organisation. What is even more suspicious, is that he knows about them, even made available the people that were at the meetings for the bilderberg, but he also knows that George Sorros, his major financier, is also part of this organisation. Seing how the meeting names do mention him being present.

Now this information in itself should prove enough about the credibility of said organisation. They are not in it for Transparency if they are financed by the shadow governement secretly trying to run the world from within.

Now here’s the kicker, it is possible that George Sorros is playing all sides. Is playing the bilderbergs and playing everyone. He has been intent on trying to grab more power for himself.

But I think that with all this information you can make up your own damn mind about what to make about Wikileaks. And if you have more information to add here, please feel free to add it here.

edit on 10-12-2010 by KpxMarMoTT because: Made some stupid mistakes

edit on 10-12-2010 by KpxMarMoTT because: Paragaph allign

edit on 10-12-2010 by KpxMarMoTT because: Another few modifications and it should be good

edit on 10-12-2010 by KpxMarMoTT because: ummm yeah

posted on Dec, 10 2010 @ 03:08 PM

Originally posted by KpxMarMoTT
But that is not the case with Wikileaks. The coverage has been everywhere. So something is fishy about this.

Yes, we are not used to being "given" so much to think about without an opinion alongside it (MSM). Kinda throws people off and sends alarm bells ringing for some.

I am trying very hard to focus on the information and not the messenger or things that are happening after the event and personally I suggest people go to Wikileaks, do their own reading and then ask themselves why they feel sick.

Not "spoonfed" but "chosen" information from a HUGE source.

This is one that got me nauseous...Corruption In Tunisia-What's Yours Is Mine

And there's THOUSANDS like this out there. I ask...why would revelations like this serve any purpose other than to provide insight into usually secret affairs and the exposure of global truth? The only thing left is that this is the big push. Divide and conquer. Us and them.

Maybe "they" are fed up waiting and want to speed things up a little by providing the battleground for ultimate censorship and suppression and eventually oppression and submission, but even with wargame and socialogical computation, can they factor in the true power of the people?

ps...thanks for the read and your valid opinions.

edit on 10/12/2010 by nerbot because: stuff

posted on Dec, 10 2010 @ 03:22 PM

Originally posted by nerbot

ps...thanks for the read and your valid opinions.

edit on 10/12/2010 by nerbot because: stuff

Im not quite sure If you meant positive or negative, but anyways im glad you apreciated the read. I'm just sure there is something more to this whole wikileaks site. The guy is absolutelly the luckiest guy alive. Other people would have lost their heads by now. Just saying it's curious

posted on Dec, 10 2010 @ 03:24 PM
In the end, wikileaks will have provided us with : war with iran for israel, war with pakistan for israel, and a regulated controlled internet...

now, does the truth movement want that or the government?

posted on Dec, 10 2010 @ 03:34 PM

Originally posted by KpxMarMoTT
Im not quite sure If you meant positive or negative

I meant positive. All information is positive regardless of how it is percieved.

For all we know you (or I) are COINTELPRO but that becomes irrelevant if knowledge is gained by an individual.

posted on Dec, 10 2010 @ 03:35 PM
reply to post by KpxMarMoTT

If you start your thought on how he stays alive. Well he is the spokes person. Wikileaks itself is hundreds of people. They'd only make a martyr of him and that would make the rest of wikileaks go more underground. That would accomplish nothing on the long term.

posted on Dec, 10 2010 @ 07:14 PM
reply to post by nerbot

I so agree. I just don't understand why the majority of people here seem to be obsessed with speculating about whether WL is something other than what it says it is, rather than focus on the incredible source of information that is now available for people to have a direct insight into what's going on in our world, and what our governments mean by 'diplomacy'.

I'm astonished that people who say they want the truth, seem to be so willing to ignore it when it is made available.

edit on 10-12-2010 by wcitizen because: (no reason given)

posted on Dec, 10 2010 @ 07:17 PM
Don't know if you've seen it, but this is kind of fun. It would make a great list to add to as time goes by.

Everything you wanted to know
about Wikileaks but didn't know to ask

Julian Assange

He's a guy with a vague history...

Who travels the world without visible means of support...

His parents: Members of an '___' "cult" that abused kids...


He's not against war...

He hates the 9/11 truth movement...

He has no info about the Bush or Obama White House...or the Federal Reserve Bank...or Goldman Sachs (but he is helping take down Bank of America)...

His "leaks" paint Pakistan as a threat and foreign politicians the CIA doesn't like as jerks...

He believes Osama is alive...and probably in Pakistan...

Everything else he "leaks" is stuff we all already knew...

The mainstream media loves him...

The right wingers love to hate him and are using him as a justification to censor the Net...

If it looks like a duck, sounds like a duck and smells like a duck...

Another intelligence agency spectacle.

posted on Dec, 10 2010 @ 10:19 PM

Originally posted by wcitizen
I so agree. I just don't understand why the majority of people here seem to be obsessed with speculating about whether WL is something other than what it says it is, rather than focus on the incredible source of information that is now available for people to have a direct insight into what's going on in our world, and what our governments mean by 'diplomacy'.

I'm astonished that people who say they want the truth, seem to be so willing to ignore it when it is made available.

Bang on, and exactly why some of us are pushing to get a new Wikileaks forum started so we have somewhere to post cables with relevant discussions, opinions and information.

Here's the thread,that is being ignored by staff after 2 WEEKS!

A Wikileaks Forum????

Flag it, spread the word and link to it wherever you can eh.

posted on Dec, 13 2010 @ 09:04 AM
I agree , Wikileaks is not only knees deep into conspiracy, it most likelly is one. There are many threads concerning the issue, and it really needs its own section. So that everything can be discussed. But I am not surprised at all that ATS would not feel great about letting the subject catch more steam. It's very simple really, there are number of conspiracies about this site and those like GLP.

The only difference in here, is you don't get banned for saying your mind. Doesnt mean youl get the attention you desire but hey thats life.

Thanks for all the other info guys and gals!

top topics


log in