It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Chett
reply to post by thewholepicture
As far as I read in this post seems to be a lot of mixing apples and oranges. Tax the rich - but calling over 250,000 a year for couples rich ..well they are not. Maybe if we talked about people over a million.
Yes those tax cuts worked, a lot of jobs were created, the first couple of years. NO just keeping them same now probably won't create any jobs, but it might prevent losing more.
A lot of talk here about record profits and stuff ...that is large corporations mostly, whole different question than personal income tax.
Originally posted by Buckwylds
......
Sorry, I am a bit drunk tonight and this stuff pisses me off. I would actually write this much better, more formal and with 25 cent words like everyone works so hard in doing on here, but I don't feel like it. Plus I left logic outside and went with emotion (maybe some logic).
Originally posted by ACTS 2:38
reply to post by thewholepicture
The clothes you wear, the car you drive the food you eat, the electricity you burn, the flooring you walk on the, computer you are reading this on.
Almost everything you but comes from a rich person, or corporation, the more you tax them they just pass it along in your cost for goods.
That is unless you are given everything you own including the food in your belly.
I predict future happiness for Americans if they can prevent the government from wasting the labors of the people under the pretense of taking care of them.. --Thomas Jefferson
A wise and frugal government which shall restrain men from injuring one another, which shall leave them otherwise free to regulate their own pursuits of industry and improvement, and shall not take from the mouth of labor the bread it has earned. This is the sum of good government. – Thomas Jefferson
The democracy will cease to exist when you take away from those who are willing to work and give to those who would not. --Thomas Jefferson
Government is not reason; it is not eloquence; it is force. Like fire, it is a dangerous servant and a fearful master. – George Washington
To take from one because it is thought that his own industry and that of his father’s has acquired too much, in order to spare to others, who, or whose fathers, have not exercised equal industry and skill, is to violate arbitrarily the first principle of association—the guarantee to every one of a free exercise of his industry and the fruits acquired by it. --Thomas Jefferson
Originally posted by johnny2127
Logically, yes the wealthy have more ability to pay more to support others, but many of you are missing the point that none of us have a right to their money. The problem is not the wealthy, ladies and gentlemen, but our large federal govt. They spent too much, over promised to everyone, and have incentivized dependence on govt. Don't blame the wealthy. The wealthy in the US donate more to charities than the rest of the world combined. If some or many are greedy, so be it, thats their right. But no one is entitled to their money. No one is entitled to fairness of outcome.
Originally posted by aching_knuckles
Originally posted by johnny2127
Logically, yes the wealthy have more ability to pay more to support others, but many of you are missing the point that none of us have a right to their money. The problem is not the wealthy, ladies and gentlemen, but our large federal govt. They spent too much, over promised to everyone, and have incentivized dependence on govt. Don't blame the wealthy. The wealthy in the US donate more to charities than the rest of the world combined. If some or many are greedy, so be it, thats their right. But no one is entitled to their money. No one is entitled to fairness of outcome.
I would agree with you, if this were 1776. But its not. The world has changed so much, and been tipped in the bankers favor, to an unreturnable degree. Not only that, alot of people want what they have paid into the system over their life. Plus we have old wars to pay for, the care of those soldiers, interest on our debt, etc. etc.
Everyone likes to was wax poetic about how welfare is stealing all their money, but we spend more money on federal pensions than welfare. We spend more on defense than on welfare, and welfare costs us only 5x more than the department of transportation.
www.usgovernmentspending.com...
The ability to take care of its citizens demonstrates a capable and just government.
If one more person tell me about how lazy welfare thieves steal all their money, Im going to lose it, because that viewpoint, especially when looking at our budget, is callous and frankly, offensive and shows a complete ignorance of facts.
Originally posted by johnny2127
60% of the US federal budget is on entitlement spending programs, with that scheduled to soar higher. We borrow 42% of our budget in the bond market right now. Regardless of how you look at the numbers, entitelement programs are out of control and bankrupting this country.
Originally posted by johnny2127
reply to post by aching_knuckles
Before you flip out about pensions being included, I need to explain. The US govt has a program called the 'Pension Benefit Guarantee Corporation' that basically takes over paying the pension of retirees for companies that cancel their pensions through bankruptcy or going out of business. The US now pays these people their pensions even though they never had a funding source for it. Also, for your website, social security is filed under the 'pensions' section.