9/11 responders bill defeated by Senate GOP filibuster, page
Pages:
ATS Members have flagged this thread 4 times
Topic started on 10-12-2010 @ 05:36 AM by whatukno

Senate Democrats failed Thursday to win a procedural vote to open debate on a bill that would provide medical benefits and compensation for emergency workers who were first on the scene of the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks.
The motion for cloture, or to begin debate, needed 60 votes to pass due to a Republican filibuster, but fell short at 57-42 in favor.
While supporters said they would try to bring the bill up again, either on its own or as part of other legislation to be considered, the vote Thursday jeopardized the measure's chances for approval in the final weeks of the current congressional session.

Please visit the link provided for the complete story.


www.cnn.com...

Well, the GOP are sure making dang sure that no matter what the rich will get richer. They had promised before that they would not let anything else go through unless people who make $250,000.00 or more a year get to keep tax cuts that haven't produced jobs or helped the economy at all.

But instead they fillibuster a bill that would help the brave men and women who risked their lives on 9/11.

I guess it all boils down to priorities, for the GOP, those don't include anyone but the wealthiest Americans.


reply posted on 10-12-2010 @ 07:24 AM by whatukno
reply to post by asperetty



Well, don't we as a country have an obligation and a duty to help those men and women who bravely went into the wreckage after 9/11 and were exposed to such toxic chemicals? Doesn't decency dictate that we pass a bill to make sure that these brave people get the care that they deserve? They obviously have earned it.


reply posted on 10-12-2010 @ 08:18 AM by whatukno
reply to post by anon72



Oh I forgot, some people only listen to WND or FOX News on this site. Silly me, maybe I can find a WND article which shows that all 9/11 first responders are evil communist Muslim terrorists with no birth certificates, I bet some would lap that up as the gospel wouldn't they?

www.govtrack.us...

There you go, the full text.


reply posted on 10-12-2010 @ 10:37 AM by anon72
reply to post by whatukno



No need to get your panties all bundled up. I just asked if you could post the thing. A little touchy I see.

Anyway, the Republicans only blocked a proceedural vote. Maybe it the Dems would have worked in the spirit of cooperation and compromise, they would have gotten it. Or maybe voted on it when they were all standing together on the Obamacare screwing we got, they would have better success. That's politics.

The good thing, or rather the other side of politics is that the Republicans (when they are in charge) can re-write it, GET PROPER FUNDING for it and then.... take credit. Sounds like Washington as usual.

The interesting thing I will be looking for is all these good-hearted Demo's who don't support the bill when it comes up next year (or so) as a Republican matter.

edit on 12/10/2010 by anon72 because: Content edit



reply posted on 10-12-2010 @ 10:52 AM by whatukno
reply to post by anon72



I guess you forgot this little bit of info:


WASHINGTON -- Senate Republicans intend to block action on virtually all Democratic-backed legislation unrelated to tax cuts and government spending in the current postelection session of Congress, officials said Tuesday, adding that the leadership has quietly collected signatures on a letter pledging to carry out the strategy.

Please visit the link provided for the complete story.


www.washingtonpost.com...

I know, I know, it's an AP Article and you probably have a problem with that too.

So, here's FOX News for you so that it's a bit more palatable.

www.foxnews.com...

So, basically, this is how the rest of the year is going to go, if the Dems don't bend to the will of the GOP, nothing else will go through, not this bill, not any bill, the GOP will block and filibuster everything coming down until tax cuts for the rich go through.


reply posted on 10-12-2010 @ 03:29 PM by whaaa
reply to post by whatukno



Isn't it ironic that those GOP scumbags that voted down help for the first responders, have a great health plan paid for by the US TAXPAYERS.

www.suite101.com...

If the libs would have the guts to run on the platform of the GOP only caring about the rich people....the Republicans would be toast.

And there are those that would say "don't play the class card" well what are the Republicans doing with their constant legislative attempts to foster welfare for the rich and corporations. see corporate subsidies for the oil companies.

www.huffingtonpost.com...

edit on 10-12-2010 by whaaa because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 11-12-2010 @ 03:31 AM by MGriff
The Republicans have allowed roughly two trillion in spending and the extension of unemployment benefits which is attached to their oh so important tax cuts. So while everyone can defend them for sticking to their guns on spending, they actually aren't, as they easily compromised their stated ideals so they could get the tax cuts. The Dems are no better. I don't prefer or support either party, and I don't agree with providing a welfare state, but a government needs to exist, and it should perform certain functions.

Taking care of the people who responded on that day should be up there on anyone's priority list. While I commend those who do advocate for less spending, I'm right there with you, this is an area where we could, say, not give foreign aid to another country in order to help our own citizens. Like the 7.5 billion dollars our elected representatives agreed to give Pakistan at the exact same time this piece of legislation initially came up.

This also, however, would blur the line as to what is catastrophic enough to warrant government aid, and I get it, but that is why our political process exists, to talk about issues such as this, not spew hate on petty issues that only exacerbate our larger problems.

These people could also be taken care of by a number of charities which formerly existed, yet did not pay their fair share of the money for financing our government, which led to ludicrous legislation being implemented.
edit on 11-12-2010 by MGriff because: (no reason given)

Pages:     ^^TOP^^



While we were Distracted with Gay Marriage news This happend today
  Posted 18 days ago with 81 member flags
People are marching in the streets all over Quebec
  Posted 3 days ago with 70 member flags
Breaking: Ron Paul to end active campaigning - cnn
  Posted 13 days ago with 26 member flags
President Obama Affirms His Support for Same Sex Marriage
  Posted 18 days ago with 24 member flags
Anon has released 1.7 GB of files....
  Posted 6 days ago with 24 member flags
Police Tasings Might Finally Be Ruled Brutality
  Posted 12 days ago with 23 member flags