posted on Dec, 9 2010 @ 12:10 PM
The answer is a most resounding yes.
To define reality, in this case, it means reality on-the-balance. No one need be overly metaphysical about holographic and whatever perceptual
matters; suffice it to say what we sense can be objectively enough considered reality. I mean reality in the context of that which is politically
controlled-enforced. Reality or unreality on-the-balance comes down to how much of "truth," or what's popularly accepted, is actually factual
and/or moral. Those like me who see the level of lies/deceptions, distortions, manipulations etc. as an inordinate-unacceptable one are of the
opinion that the political world as we know it is unreality on-the-balance. Those who favor the status quo, at least essentially, obviously
The recent festival of small potatos (at least so far) that is the Wikileaks hysteria is only the tip of the iceberg of secrecy-BASED government in
general. Enough said, basically, though I've a little more.
What will make or break the humans - and perhaps "hybrids" as well - of this planet Earth is the ability or inability to overcome our oppressors
once and for all. To be successful as such is called being on the right side of ALL future history, eternity, all evolution of consciousness.
So, once again, I'm still wishing there will be JUST ONE popular enough poster on this site who can properly criticize the most tangible, real
National "Security" STATE stuff of which government is made, without going off on whatever NWO, Illuminati, "Foundation X," Bilderbergers,
Rothschilds, Trilateral, CFR etc. tangents-distractions.