Is "Reality" Unreality Primarily BECAUSE of Secrecy?, page
Pages:
ATS Members have flagged this thread 2 times
Topic started on 9-12-2010 @ 12:10 PM by Dean Goldberry
The answer is a most resounding yes.

To define reality, in this case, it means reality on-the-balance. No one need be overly metaphysical about holographic and whatever perceptual matters; suffice it to say what we sense can be objectively enough considered reality. I mean reality in the context of that which is politically controlled-enforced. Reality or unreality on-the-balance comes down to how much of "truth," or what's popularly accepted, is actually factual and/or moral. Those like me who see the level of lies/deceptions, distortions, manipulations etc. as an inordinate-unacceptable one are of the opinion that the political world as we know it is unreality on-the-balance. Those who favor the status quo, at least essentially, obviously don't.

The recent festival of small potatos (at least so far) that is the Wikileaks hysteria is only the tip of the iceberg of secrecy-BASED government in general. Enough said, basically, though I've a little more.

What will make or break the humans - and perhaps "hybrids" as well - of this planet Earth is the ability or inability to overcome our oppressors once and for all. To be successful as such is called being on the right side of ALL future history, eternity, all evolution of consciousness.

So, once again, I'm still wishing there will be JUST ONE popular enough poster on this site who can properly criticize the most tangible, real National "Security" STATE stuff of which government is made, without going off on whatever NWO, Illuminati, "Foundation X," Bilderbergers, Rothschilds, Trilateral, CFR etc. tangents-distractions.


reply posted on 9-12-2010 @ 12:18 PM by Tripple_Helix
reply to post by Dean Goldberry



Okay, first of all...

The recent festival of small potatos (at least so far) that is the Wikileaks hysteria is only the tip of the iceberg of secrecy-BASED government in general. Enough said, basically, though I've a little more.


What in the world does that mean?


In any case- I would say that we are definitely experiencing what you call "un-reality". But, to some extent it is reality, because we allow it/life, to play out the way it does. We choose to be controlled and fed lies, so yes- we create our own un-reality to live in because we are afraid of reality.

Make sense?


reply posted on 9-12-2010 @ 12:26 PM by Dean Goldberry
reply to post by Tripple_Helix



I don't believe it makes "sense." I don't confuse what is, or may be, given and unavoidable with objective enough (by definition) reality. Reality is a designation to be earned, not just believed, IMHO.



reply posted on 10-12-2010 @ 11:01 PM by Dean Goldberry
reply to post by jsettica



First I must express my gratitude to the ownership and/or management for allowing this unpopular thread to remain at the top of its board in popularity. The crickets have been a-chirpin' here for awhile now.

Jsettica, I hope you may someday agree that secrecy creates more unreality than reality.

Cheers, everyone.
Pages:     ^^TOP^^



Memorial day thoughts.
  Posted 3 days ago with 11 member flags
Global governance and the challenge to the American Constitution
  Posted 11 days ago with 5 member flags
Abraham Lincoln Filed a Patent for "Facebook\' in 1845..? (HOAX)
  Posted 19 days ago with 3 member flags
Explosive Scoop on Obama from Breitbart.com
  Posted 10 days ago with 1 member flags