It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

An Astute Pictorial Observation

page: 1
6

log in

join
share:

posted on Dec, 8 2010 @ 02:41 PM
link   

edit on 8-12-2010 by wisintel because: fixed size




posted on Dec, 8 2010 @ 02:55 PM
link   
Pictures are worth 1000 words, right?

History in the making.



posted on Dec, 8 2010 @ 04:59 PM
link   
reply to post by wisintel
 


Pictures sure are....



edit on 8-12-2010 by Xcathdra because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 8 2010 @ 05:24 PM
link   
reply to post by Xcathdra
 


Technically innaccurate, because Julian didn't steal anything those documents were given to him.



posted on Dec, 8 2010 @ 05:36 PM
link   

Originally posted by wisintel
reply to post by Xcathdra
 


Technically innaccurate, because Julian didn't steal anything those documents were given to him.


When wikileaks provided Pvt. Manning with technical assitance, namely an encrypton program that allowed manning to encrypt the information and email it, where the encrypton program allowed the emails to bypass military security protocols for eamil, they took part in the theft itself.

So yeah.. stealing items that dont belong to him since the days of Die Hard.



posted on Dec, 8 2010 @ 06:14 PM
link   

Originally posted by Xcathdra

Originally posted by wisintel
reply to post by Xcathdra
 


Technically innaccurate, because Julian didn't steal anything those documents were given to him.


When wikileaks provided Pvt. Manning with technical assitance, namely an encrypton program that allowed manning to encrypt the information and email it, where the encrypton program allowed the emails to bypass military security protocols for eamil, they took part in the theft itself.

So yeah.. stealing items that dont belong to him since the days of Die Hard.


First of all, there is no definitive proof that Bradley Manning is the source of the documents. Secondly even if it was Manning he stated he copied and downloaded the information onto a CD named Lady Gaga. This information was then given to wikileaks at a later time/place. Wikileaks encryption did not in any way assist in stealing of any documents - Wikileaks has no access to that information.



posted on Dec, 9 2010 @ 05:12 AM
link   
reply to post by tabris
 


Then why is wikileaks providing money for Pvt. Mannings defense, when they are not doing that to anyone else?

In June of this year Assange stated he was putting together resources to defend Pvt. Manning in court, and one month later in July he went on record stating he had no idea who the source of the leak was..

Seems a little dubious...

Pvt. Manning was provided ith encrypton software so he could email the information he obtained without it being detected by military filters. This is talked about in many articles revolving around this case.



new topics

top topics



 
6

log in

join