Here's to break down to you some false and misleading arguments employed by ATS users and on posters on other forums as well about the Wikileaks and
Julien Assange major controversy, which could turn out to be disinfo tactics used by paid CIA/NSA/MOSSAD ops who use their ATS membership to spread
I'd just like to add that most of the claims here not backed by links can be easily found over the web with a simple ixquick or Scroogle search.
- Julian Assange is NOT a criminal
. Unless you have some very specific proof that revealing these cables to the public is a crime, Wikileaks is
only revealing classified documents that are labeled as "secret" or classified WITHIN their source organizations. So the if individuals working for
the Army or embassies decide ON THEIR OWN to reveal these infos, Wikileaks or Assange simply CANNOT be held accountable.
There is a major difference between internal organizational rules and public domain Law, and the freedom of press and expression is above
considerations of "criminal" activity, unless, of course, there is evidence that it endangers the lives or freedoms of innocent people. So
whistle-blowing is not a crime, it's a RIGHT, a necessity for justice to prevail in global politics.
The people who fight or condemn whistle-blowers are de facto
complicit in these criminal or illicit activity disclosed by them, since they,
instead of letting the truth be told and discussed, take the defense of the wrongdoers, attacking the messenger instead of looking at the facts.
- Wikileaks is NOT endangering the lives of people, not even Us troops or personnel.
Julian Assange, back in early summer 2010, made a public
pledge in an interview that in order to protect the lives and freedom of the people involved in the leaks, he would blank out their names. He more
precisely said that he would blank out the names of all the innocent
people, which means that they might not restraint themselves from reveling
the names of US officials or troops whose conduct makes them guilty of crimes.
So if you look at any of the cables released, all the names of soldiers and US officials -including diplomats- WERE X'ed. (like "XXXXXXX"). Only the
names of widely known politicians and State leaders appear, as necessary reference so that the cables are understandable. I dare any of you here HOW
this contributes to endangering the lives of US citizens abroad.
- Julian Assange and Wikileaks is most likely NOT a CIA/MOSSAD psyop,
as opposed to what some posters here and elsewhere would like us to
Although this idea is harder to prove since most people don't really know who Assange and his collaborators are, what is their agenda and if they have
ties -or not- to intel agencies; given the ongoing attempts at shutting down Wikileaks activities and the recent Interpol warrant and arrest or
Assange, to claim that the secret service would make their own agents being hunted and framed by the same authorities they serve is preposterous. This
includes the all-out condemnation and accusations made by the US government towards Wikileaks, as well as its recent forbidding of any government
employees to "interact" with Wikileaks documents. This is simply nonsense to believe that CIA or MOSSAD would greenlight the disclosure of such
scandalous infos as contained in the cables while at the same time doing everything they can to censor it.
Moreover, and that further supports the case against Wikileaks being tied to MOSSAD and the CIA, the one responsible for Assange's arrest under claims
of "rape", has been found to be a CIA shill, leading anti-communist and anti-Castro group in Sweden, connected to a
. She appearantly manged to trick Assange into
a sex scandal, by having an affair with him, while showing herself on Swedish websites and media to be a "leftist" supporter of Wikileaks and Assange.
Since anti-Castrists make very bad leftists, and Hardin's rape accusations are very dubious, the whole thing looks like a CIA operation to take down
Assange in a safe way... to prosecute him by destroying his image, thus avoiding him becoming a martyr.
And on a minor note, there's that zionist "hacker",
, who claimed to be the
one responsible for taking most of Wikileaks sites from the web since late November, using his very "brillant and awesome" talents (he seems to like
indulging himself for his exploits) to take down a so-called criminal behavior that endangers the lives of "our troops". This Jester is presumed to
have been taken down many Afghan Islamic websites and on-line resources in his fight against "jihads". Assuming this "patriot hacker" is for real and
not just some lame dork willing to gain fame, he's obviously, as shown in his diatribe, a defender of Law and Order and up against the enemies of
Israel and America, and his attacks against Wikileaks only gives further evidence that they are not CIA or MOSSAD covert ops. But the Jester could be,
on the other hand. And that wouldn't make him less of a dork as well...
edit on 8/12/10 by Echtelion because: (no reason
edit on 8/12/10 by Echtelion because: linking
edit on 8/12/10 by Echtelion because:
edit on 8/12/10 by Echtelion because: (no reason given)