It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by ProtoplasmicTraveler
reply to post by buddhasystem
Oh dear, the Taxpayer's fault! I now see what the problem is here, you actually believe your taxes go for goods and services to you.
Originally posted by ProtoplasmicTraveler
...
This woman's fines in part are simply being levied to pay obligations incurred by the State's which our corporations to the investors in that corporation.
...
Originally posted by buddhasystem
Originally posted by ProtoplasmicTraveler
reply to post by buddhasystem
Oh dear, the Taxpayer's fault! I now see what the problem is here, you actually believe your taxes go for goods and services to you.
As I said before, and in case you haven't read it, I'm using the library quite a bit. Is it goods and services that I make use of? Certainly is. It's local taxes and the fraction that goes to the library is listed in the tax statement. I pay and I get services. Somebody steals books, they steal from me. If you aren't capable of understanding this, I can't help you here. How does reading books makes me a slave (in your words) is equally beyond me. You just really seem to be full of hot air with little substance.
Originally posted by ProtoplasmicTraveler
Do you live in the same Library System as this woman? If no then she hasn't stolen from 'you'.
If you feel you 'own' these books, because you 'imagine' your taxes are paying for them, then she too would 'own' these books
Now here is further where your thinking really is just all about 'you' as you can't return a book that has been destroyed in a fire.
Your argument all breaks down to a selfish
Originally posted by abecedarian
Originally posted by ProtoplasmicTraveler
...
This woman's fines in part are simply being levied to pay obligations incurred by the State's which our corporations to the investors in that corporation.
...
And her neighbors were in no way inconvenienced by the loss of these books? They weren't available for anyone else to use.
...the library wasn't inconvenienced? If they did an inter-branch book transfer or otherwise replaced the books money was spent to accomodate that.
There's what her fees are for.
You can't run around complaining about the government owes us something because we pay for it then ask for the individual's forgiveness and absolution when the individuals can't hold up their end of the contract.
I take that back... you and so many others can. Now there's a double standard for you.
When the people do it, they're entitled; when the government does it, it's rape.
edit on 12/8/2010 by abecedarian because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by ProtoplasmicTraveler
Once again your arguments are based on so many ill concieved assumptions. Do you know if the fire was a fault of the woman or perhaps the city's own gas main?
You don't of course.
Originally posted by buddhasystem
Originally posted by ProtoplasmicTraveler
Once again your arguments are based on so many ill concieved assumptions. Do you know if the fire was a fault of the woman or perhaps the city's own gas main?
You don't of course.
But neither do you. If she had a point, she could have spoken to the judge. It's funny that a person whose circumstances you don't really know yourself, all of a sudden is a sacred cow exempt from normal responsibilities of an adult.
Originally posted by ProtoplasmicTravelerNo I do not know all the details as they pertain to this woman, I am simply giving her, that constitutional privelege you will not of being "innocent until proven guilty".
I wish some people would learn to think outside of the narrow little box the government teaches them too with these 'books'.
Originally posted by abecedarian
reply to post by ProtoplasmicTraveler
So where in the Constitution are those 3 laws of yours enumerated?
Which parts of the Constitution are considered legally binding?
edit on 12/8/2010 by abecedarian because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by ProtoplasmicTraveler
The fact that many of the details regarding this story were not reported either suggest bad journalism or deception and malfeasance on part of the prosecuting body and very likely both.
edit on 8/12/10 by ProtoplasmicTraveler because: spelling
Originally posted by ProtoplasmicTraveler
reply to post by abecedarian
If she spent one week in jail it would be time served, and that time served would be in liue of the fine.
Most municipalities award around 100.00 per day in jail towards fines, so chances are her fine was around 700.00 dollars including court costs which for many code violations can be up to 280.00 dollars.
So she probably owed about 400 on the books and had about 300 court costs.
This to me is an excessive punishment on library books, and that's the point of the thread, excessive punishment by municipalities to enrich themselves off of code violations.
...