It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Free Energy Produced - Einstein Proven Wrong Again

page: 16
26
<< 13  14  15   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Aug, 10 2014 @ 11:31 AM
link   

originally posted by: ChefSlug
10 Million Dollars!
10 Million Dollars!
If this is a scam someone is out 10 Million Dollars!


Actually I think it's up to somewhere north of 80 million now.



posted on Aug, 11 2014 @ 04:02 PM
link   
deleted post,

something weird happened

edit on 11-8-2014 by krash661 because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 11 2014 @ 04:04 PM
link   

originally posted by: mnemeth1

Originally posted by xxshadowfaxx
reply to post by mnemeth1
 


He had theories. For the age that he lived in, in a world where technology was barely starting, he was extremely brilliant. 100 years later, we are only now just proving those theories wrong...... If he's such a retard, then what does that make us?


It makes mainstream scientists a bunch of lying thieves for claiming space could bend.

Billions upon billions of dollars pissed down the toilet trying to "prove" Einstein's nonsense. Untold trillions of dollars lost due to the time science has spent down the wrong path Einstein created.

It is entirely possible we could have had this technology back in the 70s already if Einstein's nonsense hadn't been turned into some kind of holy gospel by the lying thieving horde.

If humanity had this technology back in the 70s, it is entirely possible many wars may never have been fought.


and yet in the last four years
einstein was correct.
amusing.
on tier one
relativity is massively used.

also, mainstream only knows what it is allowed to know.
mainstream is also behind about forty years or so.
edit on 11-8-2014 by krash661 because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 11 2014 @ 08:55 PM
link   

We have demonstrated the ability to produce electrical power using chemical systems for the direct production of electric power from the conversion of hydrogen to hydrinos, a more stable form of hydrogen


What do we do with all the hydrinos that are created?
can we safely just dump them down the drain or release them into the atmosphere?

Basically it is just hydrogen,right? what do we do with all that hydrogen that we are creating?



posted on Aug, 13 2014 @ 11:53 AM
link   
I'm just going to leave this here and walk slowly away from this thread. If anybody wishes to invest in BlackLight Power then my non-professional advice is simply to consult all the available evidence before doing so.



posted on Aug, 13 2014 @ 12:24 PM
link   
a reply to: mnemeth1

Hey Einstein, You are thinking of Isaac Newton.



posted on Aug, 13 2014 @ 01:36 PM
link   
a reply to: Rob48

wow - so blacklight has actually achieved nothing in 15 years ?



posted on Aug, 13 2014 @ 01:46 PM
link   

originally posted by: Tardacus

We have demonstrated the ability to produce electrical power using chemical systems for the direct production of electric power from the conversion of hydrogen to hydrinos, a more stable form of hydrogen


What do we do with all the hydrinos that are created?
can we safely just dump them down the drain or release them into the atmosphere?

I would imagine a hydrino water, if indeed it exists, will prove no threat to the environment.



posted on Aug, 13 2014 @ 01:53 PM
link   
a reply to: ignorant_ape

No no, it's just around the corner, I swear! We just need a little more of your money.



posted on Jun, 23 2015 @ 08:39 AM
link   
Just checking in to see how the SunCell™ is getting on?



posted on Jun, 23 2015 @ 09:21 AM
link   
a reply to: Rob48

No no, it's just around the corner, I swear! We just need a little more of your money.



posted on Jun, 23 2015 @ 09:34 AM
link   
a reply to: GetHyped

Love these revivals... Oh look, its about 5 years down the line and... OH yeah, no more evidence other than a few bad youtube videos that this works. SOoooo yeah keep up the hard work fellas



posted on Jun, 23 2015 @ 09:38 AM
link   
a reply to: ErosA433

I guess Einstein wasn't as much of a "retard" as the OP purported him to be.

Heh.



posted on Jun, 23 2015 @ 10:42 AM
link   

originally posted by: ignorant_ape
a reply to: Rob48

wow - so blacklight has actually achieved nothing in 15 years ?
I wouldn't call bilking investors out of 80 million dollars in perhaps the second biggest fraud in history "nothing", but it's a dubious accomplishment.

Also it's more like 24 years if you count Mills' prior company HydroCatalysis founded in 1991.

As for the biggest fraud I know of in adjusted for inflation dollars (over 100 million), You'd think that when John Ernst Worrell Keely died in 1898 all hope of his fraudulent "invention" would have died with him, but apparently human gullibility has no limits as he still has supporters?

John Ernst Worrell Keely

Keely still has supporters, who continue to claim that he was framed.

"Unfortunately the history books took the Scientific American debunking as fact and John Keely has been portrayed historically as a fraud and a conman. This is because Clarence Moore found the floor of Keeley's 'workshop' raised and saw a pressure machine that was hooked up to his machines to make them look like they actually worked. Those who have any inkling of physics who have studied what remains of his work, know these reports to be mostly erroneous."
—Jerry Decker, KeelyNet.com

The misconception Keely was a fraud is explored in Dale Pond's Was Keely a Fraud?
These folks claim they haven't quite got continuous rotation yet, but they got "intermittent rotation (and considerable other etheric/psi effects)" whatever that is:

www.svpvril.com...

Achieving vibratory rotation has been and continues to be our chief scientific and engineering focus. In our replications of John Worrell Keely's devices (the dynaspheres) we have already achieved intermittent rotation (and considerable other etheric/psi effects) but not yet continuous rotation.
The guy's only been dead 117 years, so give it some more time. If they don't have continuous rotation by 200 years after his death then maybe you should start to wonder...


As for those who already expected results from Mills, they sure are impatient, he's not even dead yet. May as well keep hoping he was on to something for at least 150 years after he dies.



posted on Jun, 23 2015 @ 08:54 PM
link   

originally posted by: Rob48
Just checking in to see how the SunCell™ is getting on?
Lol there was nothing there to begin with and could be an elaborate psy ops for scientific community and maybe even with full auspecies with uncle sam.



posted on Jun, 24 2015 @ 11:47 AM
link   

originally posted by: netbound
Space, in and of itself, is only a geometric volume. It has no physical properties or energy

I'll have to disagree with you there, space does have properties! Hence all the force fields, vacuum energy, etc. Space(time) is the "fabric" of the universe. True nothingess (the absolutely empty space) doesn't exist. Gavity or time dilation happen exactly because space(time) is curved. Space as a purely geometric volume is a mathematical concept.

The limiting speed of light is exactly why space isn't simply a geometric volume; resistance to acceleration (aka "mass") is the direct result of space(time) resisting that acceleration. Space is like non-Newtonian fluid: you can move and accelerate through it at relatively slow speeds, but try to achieve the speed of light and space "turns" solid for you.



posted on Oct, 31 2015 @ 06:39 AM
link   
Technology aids the exploration, feasibility and production stages of mines, and yes, technology can also make mining a safer industry. But, as executive lisa overholt points out, nothing compares to a traditional health and safety training program.
Hope this was of help.



posted on Oct, 31 2015 @ 06:50 AM
link   

originally posted by: xxshadowfaxx
reply to post by mnemeth1
 


You know, It doesn't matter if Einstien was right or wrong. He was a brilliant man.

How about showing him a little bit of respect?




There is an Einstein theory that says his wife did the work, and that after her death, he did not do anything much.
I am thankful he wasn't a Greek god...



posted on Oct, 31 2015 @ 07:00 AM
link   
a reply to: pikestaff

Zero evidence for that "theory" whatsoever.



posted on Oct, 31 2015 @ 09:55 PM
link   

originally posted by: mnemeth1

Of course, the problem is that we no longer find better ways of explaining things. We rely on fantasy fiction to explain things. We are reverting back to the dark ages of mysticism where theory trumps evidence.

If a theory does not agree with the experiment it is wrong.

Einstein's theories have been evolved to a point where they literally can not be falsified through experimentation.

That means there is no science behind them any longer, only conjecture and mysticism.

Classical physics of the flavor promoted by Mills puts limits and constraints on atomic models that the current thieves and liars of the scientific establishment find TOTALLY ABHORRENT. You can't continuously lie and steal forever if your fraud is put inside real physical limits that must meet with observed experimentation.

There's nothing in Mills theory that is made up, and I think that is what bothers the statist liars the most.

Mills wants to take away the fantasy fiction part of their precious theories and replace it with hard physical constraints.



Blacklight hasn't done anything except write papers to entice investors. None of what they are saying will pan out.
It's just marketing. This is what business do to get more money. You make rich people think if they invest right now they will become way richer soon.


I have no idea where you get your ideas about science? Conspiracy websites? Blacklight?
GR is being tested in new way all the time. Gravity waves, it's prediction for space-time being grainy is currently being tested. Yes there are actual experiments for these things. So you are actually wrong.

Einstein bashing is funny. He's not "wrong" and he's not "still ok", he's the greatest genius ever except for maybe Newton. Fashion and music rules do not apply to scientists.

And why are people wearing high socks again? Black high socks?




top topics



 
26
<< 13  14  15   >>

log in

join