Anonymous are attacking INTERPOL / Mastercard / post finance / pay pal / advbyra.se (CURRENT), page 3
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5    6  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 77 times


reply posted on 8-12-2010 @ 06:18 AM by mr-lizard
Front page of the Guardian

www.guardian.co.uk...

and BBC

www.bbc.co.uk...

Internet hacktivists are claiming to have brought down the Mastercard website as revenge for the firm withdrawing services to Wikileaks.

The Anonymous group of hackers have also brought down the website of the Swedish prosecutors office which is pursuing founder Julian Assange.

It has pledged to launch denial-of-service attacks on websites it sees as anti-Wikileaks.

Earlier it hit the Swiss bank that froze Mr Assange's assets.



reply posted on 8-12-2010 @ 06:45 AM by ArMaP
reply to post by nickoli



No problems with Facebook, but Mastercard is still unresponsive.



reply posted on 8-12-2010 @ 07:18 AM by Xcathdra
Originally posted by Revolution-2012
reply to
post by Xcathdra



Did George Washington break the law when he lead the revolutionary war?

Hmmm.


When you are trying to defend Assange I would probably stay away from an anaology that invoked the use of bloodshed to acheive a goal. In the instance I dont think Assange is going to win.

And my point was the US did not arrest Assange, Britain did. The US did not deny him bail, Britain did, and the US did not request extradition, Sweden did.

When Washington decided to fight for independance, did he attack the Portuguese?


reply posted on 8-12-2010 @ 07:22 AM by Xcathdra
reply to post by Freeborn



See my response a few posts up.

My point is what does Mastercard or Facebook have to do with assange being arrested, denied bail and extradited to Sweden? A business can decide who they choose to do business with, just as the Admins on this site can tell a person to take a leap and not come back if they disgree with whats posted.

Its a private business, just as Mastercard and Facebook. Attacking sites that decided they did not support Assange is funny. In reality it shows the maturity level of his supporters, and on the flip side it makes them no different than they people they accuse of railroading Assange.


reply posted on 8-12-2010 @ 07:24 AM by researchit
reply to post by Xcathdra



so why do they not ban the KKK , and only wiki leaks then?


reply posted on 8-12-2010 @ 07:38 AM by nickoli
reply to post by jibeho



And if we are,maybe no network at all will stay up? Ever thought of that? Some of us are very knowledgable about the network and censorship will not be tolerated,if we cant talk and be free nobody will talk, and the network will not survive.

"Man will be what he was born to be, free and independant." JFK

The war has begun,the first shots have been fired and minutemen stand at the ready. Freedom loving people unite,now is the time,it has begun.



reply posted on 8-12-2010 @ 07:47 AM by wayno
reply to post by Xcathdra



AOL did not ban Wikileaks because they didn't like them, they did so because the government told them to. That is not insignificant. In fact it is scary and worthy of protest.

I just read this. Will put up the link if I can find it again.

Sorry it was PayPal.
But PayPal has since admitted that it stopped payments following a request from the US government.

www.bbc.co.uk...
edit on 12/8/2010 by wayno because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 8-12-2010 @ 09:24 AM by searching4truth
reply to post by EFGuy



For give my ignorance. Does this mean that people use their mastercards?
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5    6  >>    ^^TOP^^



Poland Beekeepers Win Ban on Monsanto\'s GMO!
  Posted 13 days ago with 74 member flags
Girl, 16, Kills Herself After Researching 2012 Doomsday Threads...
  Posted 10 days ago with 49 member flags
AP IMPACT: Evacs and drills pared near nuke plants
  Posted 12 days ago with 31 member flags
Plane Crash!
  Posted 19 days ago with 27 member flags