It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by loner007
I think you havent a clue as to what polenski been accused of? The so called victim didnt even report the so called rape because she wasnt raped and said so herself. It is true she was 15 at the time but Polanski assumed she was at least 18 and didnt even know she was only 15.
Originally posted by loner007
I think you havent a clue as to what polenski been accused of? The so called victim didnt even report the so called rape because she wasnt raped and said so herself. It is true she was 15 at the time but Polanski assumed she was at least 18 and didnt even know she was only 15.
Originally posted by loner007
reply to post by Aeons
Really here is that playboy interview I dont think you have read it even though you mention it
www.playboy.com...
Originally posted by tothetenthpower
Why are people still talking about this 20+ years later?
The victim has even stated she wants no litigation, no nothing, just to have the past be the past.
~Keeper
Originally posted by Aeons
I don't need to put words in his mouth - he's a jackass who drugged a girl who was brought to him by her mother so he could have sex with her. No matter how you doll that up, its rape. Her mother should have been charged too.
Originally posted by FreebornIf he was a normal, everyday Joe he would have gone to jail, his celebrity and wealth should not afford him preferential treatment.