posted on Dec, 7 2010 @ 04:18 PM
This is ridiculous!
I have just read the whole article about the event and accusations by these two women.
If this account, according to the newspaper report, really is proven to be true, it is a totally absurd and an absolute contradiction to RAPE,
because, both women had consensual sex with Mr. Assange and spent hours if not days AFTER HAVING SEX with him, subsequently going to restaurants for
meals and flaunting with Mr. Assange in public spaces with many witnesses during which time there was no complaint or mention or indication of being
"RAPED" or "MOLESTED" whatsoever.
These criminal allegations surfaced way too long after the alleged crimes supposedly took place.
Plus, considering the involvement and clearly radical feminist background of the first so called "victim" reflects a very typical and well
documented pattern of revenge by such radical individuals, against men, when the female in question suddenly realises, she is not the "only woman who
hase been between the sheets with a particular male".
The male then becomes a real victim himself, despite the fact that I personally believe it really is quite "Macho" to jump from bed to bed with too
many females in a short period of time and within a small radius or close emvironment.
But this of course, is only my personal opinion, although many people in these days and ages consider it "IN" to jump from bed to bed and whoever
chooses to do so has the right to do so if it's consensual.
As a Macho type male committing to this kind of macho behavior, one must accept that jumping in the wrong bed with the wrong females can lead to
unpredictable consequences, such as this case has produced, and it also happens to females often too.
The slight difference being, females get stamped as a "whatever" but you seldom hear of a jilted male calling rape afterward.. do you ???
Men usually accept they are not cream of the crop for that particular female and.. move on.
This kind of rape accusation scenario presented by females occurs "especially when a man" has been involved with more than one woman within a very
short period of time during which, unfortunately, for whatever coincidence, the females become, or were previously, acquainted with each other.
Women tend to react somewhat more emotionally opting to expose such "Macho" "Love Rat" males, but males on the other hand tend to attempt to
inflict physical aggression directed more towards his adversary, "the other man who shagged my chick" than towards the female as we well know.
In any case, revenge using brutal physical abuse or aggression is not justified by any means or for any reason.
With females, More often than not, the result of being disappointed, frustrated, embarrassed and envious quickly develops into anger, hate and
finally, revenge and exposure of the "Macho Man" at any cost.
Even if it means teaming up with the female arch rival to achieve the satisfaction of destroying the integrity of the male in question and
"possibly" making a name for themselves bathing in the public spotlight and in some cases achieving financial gain at the same time, this does
There are many unanswered questions regarding the accounts of both women in question that still remain to be clarified!
Tell me one woman who in her right mind would "throw a party" in her own dwellings in honor of a prestigious celebrity personality a few hours
after he supposedly raped her?
Sorry, but something is very wrong here.
I feel, that this man is has become a victim of higher invisible agenda due to who he is and what he is involved in.