It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Unknown New Planet near the Sun?

page: 2
14
<< 1    3  4  5 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Dec, 7 2010 @ 02:22 PM
link   
reply to post by krazyiven
 


fear!
2nd




posted on Dec, 7 2010 @ 02:28 PM
link   

Originally posted by jazz10
You may want to check spaceweather !! Filament has collapsed and hurled a cme not earth directed (again) but that's not all. On the 13-14th december we will be witnessing The Geminid Meteor Shower.
You need to read this link though.
science.nasa.gov...

Particularly 3200 Phaethon. And also Pallas!!!

Orbits mercury and sun? Same object?


Not even a little interested?



posted on Dec, 7 2010 @ 02:30 PM
link   

Originally posted by Arken
If it was the Moon, how come there was no sun eclypse seen from earth that day? Does anyone know exactly where this telescope is located? Because even if in orbit of Earth, we technically should have seen a partial eclipse....

SDO is the source of these images; it's in a geosynchronous orbit FAR above the surface of the earth (nearly 36,000km) at 28 degrees inclination. That means it can experience a partial solar eclipse eclipse even when earth's surface doesn't catch the moon's shadow at all. You can test this for yourself by simulating SDO's orbit and looking towards the sun at the appropriate date and time. Celestia or Orbiter can be used to do this fairly easily. Here are SDO's orbital elements according to celestrak:
SDO
1 36395U 10005A 10339.52043152 -.00000012 00000-0 00000+0 0 1883
2 36395 27.9524 184.3762 0002434 323.7533 11.6594 1.00272842 3170



posted on Dec, 7 2010 @ 02:41 PM
link   

Originally posted by Ophiuchus 13
reply to post by Soylent Green Is People
 


Holup so its an actual celestial body smh moving that fast. I will check your post. If thats a real celestial body. I dont think its the moon friend. I will check you post though.

It took abot 23 minutes to cross a portion of the Sun.

That sounds about right, considering the Moon and the SDO spacecraft are both moving. I mean, that's about the same as a partial solar eclipse as seen from earth.



posted on Dec, 7 2010 @ 02:47 PM
link   

Originally posted by Soylent Green Is People
It's the Moon.

These are pictures of the Moon getting in the way between the Solar Dynamic Orbiter (SDO) spacecraft and the Sun (this is called a "transit" of the Moon, which is essentially an eclipse). It also happened back on November 6th and also back in October. The people running the SDO spacecraft knew this transit was going to occur.

Sources:
Novermber 6 SDO Lunar Transit (with mention of the Dec 6 transit)

October 7 Transit SDO Website

The funniest part is that in a very similar thread concerning the November 6th transit, I predicted that a another like that would be started after the December 6th transit. I guess I was right.

Here's that post from November:
www.abovetopsecret.com...


edit on 12/7/2010 by Soylent Green Is People because: (no reason given)


its the Moon... what Moon ?

The satellite is 1.5 million kilometers from earth that is four times the distance of our moon.

It is in a direct line with the Sun.
NASA states that it has an uninterrupted view
which means not broken, discontinued, or hindered

Also this is not a lens shutter or camera apparatus the object was captured passing for twenty five minutes.

have a look at the reflection


My first thoughts were mercury as seen here by the Hinode satelite


Remember NASA's own words has an uninterrupted view




posted on Dec, 7 2010 @ 02:51 PM
link   

Originally posted by ocker
its the Moon... what Moon ?

The satellite is 1.5 million kilometers from earth that is four times the distance of our moon.

Incorrect. The satellite is about 37,000km from earth.


It is in a direct line with the Sun.
NASA states that it has an uninterrupted view
which means not broken, discontinued, or hindered

That would be SOHO, these images are from SDO, a completely different satellite.


Remember NASA's own words has an uninterrupted view

SDO's view is not completely uninterrupted due to the moon.



posted on Dec, 7 2010 @ 02:56 PM
link   

Originally posted by jazz10

Originally posted by jazz10
You may want to check spaceweather !! Filament has collapsed and hurled a cme not earth directed (again) but that's not all. On the 13-14th december we will be witnessing The Geminid Meteor Shower.
You need to read this link though.
science.nasa.gov...

Particularly 3200 Phaethon. And also Pallas!!!

Orbits mercury and sun? Same object?


Not even a little interested?



posted on Dec, 7 2010 @ 03:00 PM
link   
reply to post by ocker
 


ocker....a very simple Internet search would have prevented the foot-in-mouth, sorry:

sdoisgo.blogspot.com...

The inclination/desire to immediately "jump" to some outrageously "cosmic" explanation for a very prosaic event, unfortunately has infected ATS of late. Not everything is some "exciting new discovery"....and, anything that IS going to be "exciting" and "new" likely won't be "discovered" here....sorry again.

Fun as it is, ATS and new astronomical discoveries? Not the primary purpose. Better, a clearing house for dispelling all of these false "beliefs", based on poor understandings of science.



posted on Dec, 7 2010 @ 03:00 PM
link   
reply to post by Soylent Green Is People
 





It's the Moon.


I'm not an astronomer, so can you please give us the distances of:

Moon/Sun

and

SOHO/Sun?



posted on Dec, 7 2010 @ 03:00 PM
link   

Originally posted by ocker

its the Moon... what Moon ?

The satellite is 1.5 million kilometers from earth that is four times the distance of our moon.

It is in a direct line with the Sun.
NASA states that it has an uninterrupted view
which means not broken, discontinued, or hindered

I take it you didn't bother reading my post or checking out the links before you replied. If you did read my post, you would have known these are images from the SDO spacecraft, not SOHO.

(by the way, I erred before. SDO stands for Solar Dynamics Observatory, not Orbiter)



posted on Dec, 7 2010 @ 03:04 PM
link   

Originally posted by Arken
reply to post by Soylent Green Is People
 

I'm not an astronomer, so can you please give us the distances of:

Moon/Sun

and

SOHO/Sun?

93 million miles and about 91.5 million miles respectively. What does that have to do with this thread? The source of the images is the SDO satellite, not SOHO.



posted on Dec, 7 2010 @ 03:10 PM
link   

Originally posted by Arken
reply to post by Soylent Green Is People
 





It's the Moon.


I'm not an astronomer, so can you please give us the distances of:

Moon/Sun

and

SOHO/Sun?


As ngchunter pointed out, this is from the SDO spacecraft and NOT the SOHO spacecraft.

The SDO is in geosynchronous orbit of the earth, at about 23,000 miles (37,000 km) away. At this distance, lunar transits of the Sun (i.e., solar eclipses) would occur at different times than they do here on Earth.

Also, the Moon would appear to be about the same size as it does from here on Earth (roughly -- on average).


edit on 12/7/2010 by Soylent Green Is People because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 7 2010 @ 03:20 PM
link   
post removed because the user has no concept of manners

Click here for more information.



posted on Dec, 7 2010 @ 03:21 PM
link   

Originally posted by ngchunter

Originally posted by ocker
its the Moon... what Moon ?

The satellite is 1.5 million kilometers from earth that is four times the distance of our moon.

Incorrect. The satellite is about 37,000km from earth.


It is in a direct line with the Sun.
NASA states that it has an uninterrupted view
which means not broken, discontinued, or hindered

That would be SOHO, these images are from SDO, a completely different satellite.


Remember NASA's own words has an uninterrupted view

SDO's view is not completely uninterrupted due to the moon.


Oh the op mentioned it was SOHO.
my bad I thought SDO was just solar dynamics .and was just owned by NASA.

the helioviewer is jointly owned by NASA and the ESA as is the SOHO hence the connection

confused

I apologise to Soylent Green Is People at laughing at his post and hope he accepts my humble appology
(Ocker bows his head in shame)



posted on Dec, 7 2010 @ 03:31 PM
link   
How many Lunar transit in these days?


From sdoisgo.blogspot.com...


Friday, December 3, 2010

Lunar Transit: There will be a lunar transit tomorrow that will be visible by SDO.
When: 2010-12-04 02:45:22 UT



posted on Dec, 7 2010 @ 03:32 PM
link   

Originally posted by Soylent Green Is People
The funniest part is that in a very similar thread concerning the November 6th transit, I predicted that a another like that would be started after the December 6th transit. I guess I was right.

When I first saw this thread that was the first question that ran through my mind; why didn't they raise a fuss the last time this happened on SDO? I see now that they did. All is as it should be (lol). I like your preemptive thread idea. I think I'm also going to set up an Orbiter Simulator scenario just for this and grab some screenshots at the various dates when the moon transits the sun from SDO, perhaps they can even go into any future preemptive threads.
edit on 7-12-2010 by ngchunter because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 7 2010 @ 03:32 PM
link   

Originally posted by Arken
How many Lunar transit in these days?


From sdoisgo.blogspot.com...


Friday, December 3, 2010

Lunar Transit: There will be a lunar transit tomorrow that will be visible by SDO.
When: 2010-12-04 02:45:22 UT

They got the date wrong on that post, but it was right when they first predicted it a month prior.



posted on Dec, 7 2010 @ 03:36 PM
link   

Originally posted by Arken
How many Lunar transit in these days?


Does it really matter when we are all doomed to a fiery death at the hands of the Annunaki and Nibiru?

We must log off ATS at once, and go to our shelters (or covers) to be safe.

Run!



posted on Dec, 7 2010 @ 03:49 PM
link   

Originally posted by weedwhacker
reply to post by ocker
 


ocker....a very simple Internet search would have prevented the foot-in-mouth, sorry:



yup i was cocking my leg on the wrong tree Weedy , I Should know better




posted on Dec, 7 2010 @ 07:47 PM
link   
Simple: its not "nibiru": there is no "Nibiru". Or reptilians,or "torsional physics or "robot heads on mars.."and I wil not debate,. its b.s. entertainment( buy a few dvd's or "special reports). You don't think a planet wandering around the solar system might jack up a few orbits and be entirely too cold for any kind of life on its out bound leg and 12 bazillion year ellipitical orbit? or too hot on a close approach to the sun?


If we couldn't see it because "it came in behind the Sun! " Well that's even better; guess where we'll be in 6months ? 180 degrees from where we are now in orbit:"Behind the sun". We'll be like Moe and Curly chasing each other around a dining room table...''' bah...


edit on 7-12-2010 by 46ACE because: (no reason given)

edit on 7-12-2010 by 46ACE because: (no reason given)



new topics

top topics



 
14
<< 1    3  4  5 >>

log in

join