posted on Dec, 6 2010 @ 10:08 AM
The message in this article seems to be that Wikileaks just might be able to save US policy.
But the whirlwind around this batch of WikiLeaks leaks seems to point to a deeper concern among the public, one that stems from the increasing
distance between the international reality they see and what their leaders describe to them. In recent years, the US public has had to hear its
leaders repeatedly tell Americans that black was white: President Clinton said he didn’t know Monica (in the biblical sense) or who attacked the USS
Cole in Yemen; President George W. Bush said Saddam was a WMD threat and then that there was no insurgency in Iraq; and President Barack Obama has
said we are winning in Afghanistan, jihad is self-improvement (like stopping alcohol consumption) and that Indonesia is a model of sectarian
tolerance. The latter is a particularly remarkable black-is-white moment—there have been times in Indonesia in recent years when you probably could
have turned off your car lights and driven safely at night by the illumination provided by burning Christian churches.
This sort of regular and routine deceit has increased the suspicion of Americans—and I’d bet the suspicion of other nations’ publics, too—that
they are being lied to about the conduct of governmental affairs. As a result, Americans seem to have become ever more eager to examine illegally
acquired and disclosed ‘secret’ information in the hope of finding out what’s really going on.
edit on 6-12-2010 by wcitizen because: (no reason given)