It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by byteshertzThey believe they are on the side of humanity and are attempting to step in to the role of ombudsman for governments. No matter what they say I believe they are more than happy to comprimise the security of the USA for the truth, because they believe it is for the greater good. Just my 2c
Originally posted by Tsuki-no-Hikari
There's nothing to be gained by releasing this cable.
Originally posted by Nyteskye
The minute I read the news article this morning, the 1st thing I thought was that it stinks of disinfo.
There's no wrong-doing or even anything embarrassing about this list. It's tailor made ammunition for Wikileaks enemies. It serves no other purpose, as far as I can tell. As always with these things, the question is “Cui bono? (Who benefits?)". In this case, the answer is not 'the truth' and it's not Wikileaks.
Has anybody actually found this cable in the archive or seen it's official release on WL?
Originally posted by jfj123
reply to post by Tsuki-no-Hikari
Just a couple points:
1. Anybody wonder how wikileaks is getting all this info?
2. If wikileaks can get all this highly classified info about many countries all over the world, why doesn't it have anything about the supposed inside job on 9/11 ? The millions of classified or sensative documents not not one memo about 9/11?
Wikileaks has not, despite all the bluster and media hysteria, really released much that hasn't been in the blogosphere, or at least hinted at / speculated, for a long time.
Originally posted by BiGGz
reply to post by infinite
I deal with facts. Not ill-conceived conspiracies and speculations. There are many valuable places of interest for terrorist attacks on that list.
You say that those facilities aren't vital to you, but when you lack the necessities you take for granted day by day because you don't have a supply coming in, you'll be singing a different toon. You obviously fail to understand the impact of a coordinated terror attack on our imported infrastructure facilities.
And what does TSA have do to with any of this? Or is that just your way of personally attacking me? Because TSA-pat downs is 101% irrelevant to this conversation.edit on 6-12-2010 by BiGGz because: (no reason given)