It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
A letter to the Governing and Legislative Bodies of the United States of America
The Governing Body of the United States of America (they) has enacted the “United States of America Patriot Act of Congress” which is in violation of our rights to freedom of self and property as stated in the United States of Americas' Constitution.
They have repeatedly taken personal property and monetary property from citizens unlawfully by imposing a national income tax on the people in direct violation of the constitution of the United States of America, and have enacted no law that require people to pay a National income tax.
The Congress shall have Power To lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises, to pay the Debts and provide for the common Defence and general Welfare of the United States; but all Duties, Imposts and Excises shall be uniform throughout the United States;
Article 1 Section 9 of the United States Constitution States: that “No capitation, or other direct, tax shall be laid, unless in proportion to the census or enumeration herein before directed to be taken.”
The Congress shall have power to lay and collect taxes on incomes, from whatever source derived, without apportionment among the several States, and without regard to any census or enumeration.
They have allowed and encouraged state and local governance to impose laws and codes that knowingly go against the civil liberties and rights of it's people in violation of the amendments of the United States of America.
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.
The have knowingly allowed and accepted campaign contributions from corporate businesses in an effort to win an election. This gives a corporation the ability to cause corruption amongst our governing bodies, in an effort to further an agenda to suit their needs and not the needs, nor will of the people.
They have knowingly and intentionally created the “Federal Reserve Act of Congress” in violation of the United States Constitution thus giving control of our currency and debt to corporate finance companies and placed there officials in positions of influence in an effort to regulate or abolish regulations that make them more profitable.
They have repeatedly passed laws and amendments without prior knowledge of the people of the states they so represent.
They Repeatedly pass Laws, Acts of Congress, and Amendments to our constitution, that contradict the will and rights of the people they represent.
They have knowingly and intentionally been involved in covert operations, causing harm to the property and citizens of the United States of America, in an effort to declare war on a foreign or domestic persons.
They knowingly allow corporations to distribute our valuable commodities, such as oil, water, and minerals for a profit with little to no taxation of said corporations.
They have repeatedly allowed and encouraged the court systems and legislative bodies of the United States of America to pass ordinances and laws which hold the enforcers of the codes and laws unaccountable for actions that violate civil liberties and our bill of rights.
The citizens of the United States of America
Can you be specific as to what parts of the patriot act are actually unconstitutional?
Actually Article I Section 8 of the United States Constitution disagrees with you..
States get to pass laws, sorry.
In principal I do agree with you, however, the supreme court has decided that they can.
Can you specifically show where the Federal Reserve is actually unconstitutional?
It's up to the people to keep aware of what bills and laws are being passed by this government, it's all too easy to check. thomas.gov... www.opencongress.org... Both are very valuable resources at your disposal which can let you check what is going on in your government. You not knowing doesn't mean much.
Which amendments specifically do you object to?
Do you actually have valid proof of this? Or is this just speculation and hearsay?
I think those companies would disagree with you, and their tax records would probably disagree with you as well.
This is just a flat out lie.
You don't speak for me.
U.S. District Judge Ann Aiken ruled that the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, as amended by the Patriot Act, "now permits the executive branch of government to conduct surveillance and searches of American citizens without satisfying the probable cause requirements of the Fourth Amendment."
No laws have yet to be passed by congress requiring an income tax.
You are correct, but not in violation of our bill of rights!
The Supreme court is charged with upholding the constitution of the United States and the rights of it's people, in this case they have not done so.
Article I, Section 8 of our Constitution states:
"The Congress shall have Power......To coin Money, regulate the Value thereof, and of foreign Coin, and fix the Standard of Weights and Measures;" (congress no longer has this power)
Article I, Section 10 States:
No State shall.... coin Money; emit Bills of Credit; make any Thing but gold and silver Coin a Tender in Payment of Debts;"
They have knowingly hidden agendas in this bills in a written language not always understood by American people. See Patriot Act
How often do our so called representatives ask the people of there state what they thought?
Look up The Gulf of Tonkin Incident
ExxonMobil Paid no federal income tax in 2009
Though Exxon's financial statement's don't show any net income tax liability owed to Uncle Sam, a company spokesman insists that once its final tax bill is figured, Exxon will owe a "substantial 2009 tax liability." How substantial? "That's not something we're required to disclose, nor do we."
The legal justification for arresting the "shooter" rests on existing wiretapping or eavesdropping laws, with statutes against obstructing law enforcement sometimes cited. Illinois, Massachusetts, and Maryland are among the 12 states in which all parties must consent for a recording to be legal unless, as with TV news crews, it is obvious to all that recording is underway. Since the police do not consent, the camera-wielder can be arrested.
Thus holding them unaccountable for there actions
do you believe we are a completely free society?
do you believe putting me on a watch list because I practiced freedom of speech is constitutional under our bill of rights?
Originally posted by whatukno
Oh for Pete's sake, not ANOTHER one of these.
The government should put people that write these kinds of things on a watch list.
The problem I see is, people who write these "declaration of independence" or use the original Declaration of Independence, are basically saying they are revolting against the government and have the intention of taking up arms against the government.
Thats why I think these people should be watched.
Those who would willingly and purposely kill their fellow countrymen should be locked up, those who would threaten to kill their fellow countrymen should be watched. Having a dissenting opinion of the government is fine. If your only solution is the violent overthrow of that government, I cannot agree with that opinion, nor can I condone that opinion.