It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Now, what happened before that [Big-Bang]? There are two views. One is 'Don’t ask that question,' which is very close to saying that God did it. And the other is that we live in an oscillating universe in which there is an infinite number of expansions and contractions. The former of these views happens, by chance, to be close to the Judeo-Christian-Islamic view, the latter, close to the standard Hindu views. And so, if you like, you can think of the varying contentions of these two major religious views being fought out in the field of contemporary satellite astronomy. Because that’s where the answer to this question will very likely be decided. This is an experimental question. And it is very likely that in our lifetime we will have the answer to it. And I stress that this is very different from the usual theological approach, where there is never an experiment that can be performed to test out any contentious issue. Here there is one. So we don’t have to make judgments now. All we have to do is maintain some tolerance for ambiguity until the data are in, which may happen in a decade or less." (Carl Sagan, 1985 Gifford Lectures).
Originally posted by Xcalibur254
reply to post by dialecticchaos77
If they're both the same please provide me with the mountains of empirical data that has been published in peer-reviewed journals that supports Creationism.
Originally posted by madnessinmysoul
reply to post by EarthCitizen07
Originally posted by EarthCitizen07
The negative is the opinion/fact that humans did not evolve from monkeys.
...I think I may have already explained this to you, but I'll just say it again. Evolutionary theory doesn't say that humanity evolved from monkeys. We share a common ancestor with them.
Originally posted by madnessinmysoul
The other part is that human evolution isn't the main focus of evolutionary theory. We're just one out of a plethora of species.
Originally posted by madnessinmysoul
Now, in this case you are arguing science rather than philosophy, so it gets interesting. There is plenty of evidence and argumentation in favor of evolutionary theory. In this case you'd have to attempt to falsify the work of evolutionary biology, as the scientific community has already done their part to prove the theory.
Originally posted by madnessinmysoul
...um...so a sarcastic implication that scientists do cherry pick data proves your various serious accusation?
Originally posted by madnessinmysoul
Here's the thing, scientists cannot cherry pick data. Other scientists would catch it. It would actually be incredibly harmful for your career.
Now, can you provide evidence that scientists regularly cherry pick data?
Originally posted by madnessinmysoul
reply to post by Xcalibur254
I think I've already personally linked those two sources multiple times in this thread. I know of linked them dozens of times in various other threads. Creationists don't bother reading them.
It can't evolve unless its dna is changed!
Originally posted by TheWill
reply to post by EarthCitizen07
It can't evolve unless its dna is changed!
Which can be observed readily. take a two clonal(read: DNA identical) cultures of E. coli. add broad spectrum antibiotics to one culture, wait until the other dish is nicely fuzzed-over with E. coli colonies before adding the same broad-spectrum antibiotic.
Quite often, in the second case, you'll have new colonies forming. Sequence the DNA of these new colonies.
Looky-loo, it's changed.
Originally posted by EarthCitizen07
reply to post by TheWill
Yes but the evolutionists claim everything happens randomily and with no intelligent guidance.
That is where I disagree with them!
Originally posted by TheWill
reply to post by Cosmic.Artifact
It means that variation is not only lost (through natural selection and genetic drift, etc) but also generated, providing a mechanism for evolution to carry on long term.
It was mostly a response to EarthCitizen's ill advised comment and a personal response to the word "shill".
Originally posted by TheWill
reply to post by Cosmic.Artifact
It means that variation is not only lost (through natural selection and genetic drift, etc) but also generated, providing a mechanism for evolution to carry on long term.
It was mostly a response to EarthCitizen's ill advised comment and a personal response to the word "shill".