It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Aim64C
reply to post by orbitbaby
The release of wikileaks documents was an illegal act - period. I cannot change law because I may or may not find it to be inconvenient. Only judges have assumed that authority in spite of the Constitution. Those documents still have a valid security classification applied to them and are still subject to being handled in accordance with proper procedure. Failure of federal employees to handle classified material according to the instructions provided by their member agencies is grounds for prosecution.
I cannot change law. It is not a threat. It is not anything 'unexpected.' It is simply the way things are. I have my doubts about how successful they will be in enforcing this - but I'm also not about to stick my wang out there to risk being slammed in the door, either.
The contents of these documents are rather inconsequential to my own personal convictions, and are really only useful as a historical record and account. I am already well aware of the fact that people in positions higher than myself make decisions I would fundamentally disagree with. I am already well aware of the fact that we collect intelligence on other nations, allies included.
Originally posted by kyred
reply to post by orbitbaby
Federal employees? While social security recipients, military retirees, got no raise last year and will get none this coming yesr, because cost of living actually went down,
And federal employees got raises because their expenses rose, WTF????, lol
Do you expect people, federal employees, like senators and congresspersons, would refuse these obviously unwarrented raises? LMAO!
What I'd like to see is, federal employees get paid in cash each payday. And then wish them good luck getting that cash home or to their favorite bank. lol
Just maybe, if the reality of life of most American citizens, came home to roost upon the teat sucking scums, things might change.
Originally posted by Aim64C
reply to post by orbitbaby
As a federal employee, I have to say I disagree with you on this point.
There is never a good time to disobey a lawful order. There are only times to do what is correct according to your values and principles.
People keep secrets. If your life were cracked open, most of the people out there could be jailed for some offense or another that has been committed and gone unnoticed and unprosecuted. Government agencies are also authorized by our elected officials to keep certain things secret, and for good reason. Many of those things are not going to be popular, but need to be done.
The contents of these documents are rather inconsequential to my own personal convictions, and are really only useful as a historical record and account. I am already well aware of the fact that people in positions higher than myself make decisions I would fundamentally disagree with. I am already well aware of the fact that we collect intelligence on other nations, allies included.
Originally posted by BenIndaSun
Originally posted by Aim64C
reply to post by orbitbaby
As a federal employee, I have to say I disagree with you on this point.
There is never a good time to disobey a lawful order. There are only times to do what is correct according to your values and principles.
People keep secrets. If your life were cracked open, most of the people out there could be jailed for some offense or another that has been committed and gone unnoticed and unprosecuted. Government agencies are also authorized by our elected officials to keep certain things secret, and for good reason. Many of those things are not going to be popular, but need to be done.
The contents of these documents are rather inconsequential to my own personal convictions, and are really only useful as a historical record and account. I am already well aware of the fact that people in positions higher than myself make decisions I would fundamentally disagree with. I am already well aware of the fact that we collect intelligence on other nations, allies included.
As a federal taxpayer I have to disagree with the basis of your post. The first two bolded sentences can be completely contradictory, and you act as though they can coexist...they cannot in a rational world unless you continuously conform your values and principles to match current laws.
Second, your comparison of private citizen's secrets to those of govt agencies and ***public*** officials is quite ridiculous. They are elected by us, paid for by us, therefore they should answer to us. They can keep all of the secrets they want but not in my name as part of their public official/govt role, and not on my income.
As a federal taxpayer I have to disagree with the basis of your post. The first two bolded sentences can be completely contradictory, and you act as though they can coexist...they cannot in a rational world unless you continuously conform your values and principles to match current laws.
Second, your comparison of private citizen's secrets to those of govt agencies and ***public*** officials is quite ridiculous. They are elected by us, paid for by us, therefore they should answer to us. They can keep all of the secrets they want but not in my name as part of their public official/govt role, and not on my income.
I cannot change law because I may or may not find it to be inconvenient.
Originally posted by Paranoidinmycrawlspace
I'd rather not face Non-Judicial punishment just for the satisfaction of showing them that I think this is stupid. Losing pay, getting restricted to the unit, getting busted down, and possible confinement are not worth it to me. We all had to sign a form saying we read and understood the orders about not reading wiki*****. I dont agree with it but orders are orders.
You sir are the epitome of why this country is in its downward spiral having no concept of government of by and for the people.
Government derives it's authority from the consent of the people, are you not one of the people? The people are the creators of the government, does the creation have more authority then its creator?
By lending authority to the government did you lose said authority as a free sovereign individual? No you merely designated a servant to wield that authority on your behalf and you always retain that authority at all times for you are the source of it.
The only authority you gave government was to uphold the rights of the people. To obey a law for sake of law is the watch cry of a slave. You are the master and source of government not the other way around and as the master have every right and every duty to know what your servant is up to.
But you have reversed the roles and forgotten who you are as most Americans have and think you are the servant bound to obey the master your government.
Nothing could be further from the truth! You the master now fear your servant the government and are afraid to disobey his unlawful decrees.
This type of thinking has effectively nullified Government of by and for the people and changed it to Government over the people by threat of force violence and death!
I can understand accessing using Government Equipment, but on your own PC at home, Come On. And how can they Police or know what you doing on your PC at home unless they were spying on you 24/7. They only way they can "Lawfully" spy on people is if they are suspected of Criminal Activity. I thought only politicians were criminals and everybody else just drones. Sigh, the fear of GOD will prevail, because nobody will challenge it. However you should be able to challenge them using their own Laws against them.
Originally posted by Paranoidinmycrawlspace
reply to post by Peloquin
I think there may be a slight difference between them telling us to not read classified info and the holocaust.
BTW, Nagasaki and Hiroshima ended the war with Japan. They were warned several times. (research it) I guess you think America is the bad guy? What about Japanese rape camps? What about Palawan? What about Loa Kulu? What about Cheribon? What about Bataan? I could do this all day. I guess you would have been the guy to say "Let's talk it out" while this stuff was going on. Glad American leadership had guts...back then.
Originally posted by Aim64C
reply to post by orbitbaby
As a federal employee, I have to say I disagree with you on this point.
There is never a good time to disobey a lawful order. There are only times to do what is correct according to your values and principles.
To that, I must point out, the wikileaks documents have little to do with it. I disagree with a number of things in our government at this point in time - and have for a while - and I really only care to see the size of government reduced and its influence over individual civilian lives reduced along with its tampering of the business world.
People keep secrets. If your life were cracked open, most of the people out there could be jailed for some offense or another that has been committed and gone unnoticed and unprosecuted. Government agencies are also authorized by our elected officials to keep certain things secret, and for good reason. Many of those things are not going to be popular, but need to be done.
The only sensible action to take is what I already chose to do - work towards the minimizing of government influence in areas it has no business interfering with. That reduces the influence of any crimes or corruption in the government and also reduces the possible gains to be had from criminal behavior.
The release of wikileaks documents was an illegal act - period. I cannot change law because I may or may not find it to be inconvenient. Only judges have assumed that authority in spite of the Constitution. Those documents still have a valid security classification applied to them and are still subject to being handled in accordance with proper procedure. Failure of federal employees to handle classified material according to the instructions provided by their member agencies is grounds for prosecution.
I cannot change law. It is not a threat. It is not anything 'unexpected.' It is simply the way things are. I have my doubts about how successful they will be in enforcing this - but I'm also not about to stick my wang out there to risk being slammed in the door, either.
The contents of these documents are rather inconsequential to my own personal convictions, and are really only useful as a historical record and account. I am already well aware of the fact that people in positions higher than myself make decisions I would fundamentally disagree with. I am already well aware of the fact that we collect intelligence on other nations, allies included.
As a former federal employee in the Navy, that statement of yours is full of crap. We CITIZENS of these United States own this country and we damned well can change law.
If this info was so damned sensitive, then why wasn't it guarded closer? Because it ISN'T sensitive; it is simply embarrassing, which is a whole nother matter.
Either wikileaks is disclosing relevant info, or exposing a weakness in our security systems. Either way it is a service to our citizens.
Pardon me if I don't buy into your "authoritative missive", but I have pissed on more federal employees than you have ever met.