It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by wrathofall
Chucky, you just don't want to see it. Your playing right into their hands. It's not about being willing to die for what you believe in, it's about NOT playing THEIR game. Your are the exact hot headed jackass that is going to allow them to enact their plans. But you are to much of a bad ass, you know it all and you won't listen to logical thinking. Nothing that I say or anyone else here says will convince you otherwise. You are a representative of a minority in this world that will flip a switch that they are waiting to be switched. Go for it. See how it works out for us. You are no better than they are.
Originally posted by Hefficide
reply to post by TechUnique
You are of course correct that a violent revolution is impossible. It would only work if it were spontaneous - happening everywhere at once - and had the numbers behind it to make it work. The more zealous amongst us, at least in America, like to point out that we have guns. Well... I have three guns and I don't care to match their firepower to this:
Against that, my biggest weapon, a 12 gauge shotgun, just doesn't hold up.
But, and this is the painful truth that people avoid over and over again... Real "revolution" is much less violent and much more difficult. We have the means to conduct this revolution right now... all of us. But, when the rubber hits the road, few if any will agree to it.
Ghandi showed us the beginnings of the path. Modern life fills in the blanks...
If we all (those in the middle class and lower) simply opt out - we would win. If we all just refused to go to work, to purchase anything, to use our utilities, to drive our cars... If we all just turned off the system... even for a few days... Change would occur.
The beast that holds us down feeds upon our money and the sweat of our brow. We are the enablers and WE are addicted to what the beast offers us.
Violence is unnecessary when we can slay our demons simply by starving them of our own participation in their system. The real question we need to ask ourselves is not "would I take up arms"... It's "Am I committed enough to just refuse to be a part of it"?
~Heff
Originally posted by TechUnique
reply to post by NadaCambia
Violent revolution may have worked in the past but it would not work now. Not for a full overthrow of the current PTB anyway.
Can you actually comprehend the power being the British army or Army army against its own people? Let alone the other countries that could be called in for help.
Violent revolution would be a pointless and un-winnable war where many would die for nothing in the long run.
Technology is way too advanced to be fighting a war against your own government nowadays.
If you can't see this then that is your problem, god speed and god bless.
Originally posted by NadaCambia
reply to post by NadaCambia
While you're comfortable sat in your middle class suburban home, driving to Marks and Spencers in your Dads hybrid car, worrying about a tax increase on wine, the working class majority are going through real struggle. Struggle that won't be ignored for much longer. That's what I need you to understand.
It's okay to take the moral high ground when you're in a position to do that. Most people aren't. If you poke someone with a stick for long enough, they'll snap, violently. Until you're poked with a stick you'll never understand the flaws of being a Pacifist.
Originally posted by bikeshedding
reply to post by TechUnique
It isn't feasible, *in your opinion.* Further, you seem only to have considered this in terms of raw numbers of revolutionaries versus raw numbers of troops and the technology of the troops versus the technology of the resistance. I believe that is short-sighted and not very thorough criteria. Again, if numbers and technology are all that matters, how are Afghani resistance fighters so successful? Why hasn't the US been able to declare victory and leave?
It's feasible. You just aren't being imaginative enough in your analysis, or more accurately, the lack thereof.
Originally posted by TechUnique
Originally posted by NadaCambia
reply to post by NadaCambia
While you're comfortable sat in your middle class suburban home, driving to Marks and Spencers in your Dads hybrid car, worrying about a tax increase on wine, the working class majority are going through real struggle. Struggle that won't be ignored for much longer. That's what I need you to understand.
It's okay to take the moral high ground when you're in a position to do that. Most people aren't. If you poke someone with a stick for long enough, they'll snap, violently. Until you're poked with a stick you'll never understand the flaws of being a Pacifist.
I'm sorry but you know nothing about me.
I live in a ghetto scummy town in England. I live in a modest council house with my mother ever since I was evicted.
I have decent qualifications and have been looking for a job for years but with no luck. I am still only 18.
Got kicked out of my mothers before I was even 16..
I don't mean to rant about my life, other people have it a lot worse but you seem to think I have lived in some sort of fantasy bubble world where all my needs are catered for. This is FAR from the case.
If you don't believe I am who I say I am, check out my music in my signature.
I would love nothing more than to take part in a violent revolution and take these scumbags down. It just isn't feasible.
edit on 26/10/2010 by TechUnique because: (no reason given)edit on 26/10/2010 by TechUnique because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by fredcall
reply to post by TechUnique
It's liberals against conservatives....and liberals make for terrible fighters. A revolution would last less than a week before the liberals have all surrendered. We're really not all that worried. Honest.
Originally posted by TechUnique
Originally posted by bikeshedding
reply to post by TechUnique
It isn't feasible, *in your opinion.* Further, you seem only to have considered this in terms of raw numbers of revolutionaries versus raw numbers of troops and the technology of the troops versus the technology of the resistance. I believe that is short-sighted and not very thorough criteria. Again, if numbers and technology are all that matters, how are Afghani resistance fighters so successful? Why hasn't the US been able to declare victory and leave?
It's feasible. You just aren't being imaginative enough in your analysis, or more accurately, the lack thereof.
In England there are barely any guns floating about.
Sure I could get hold of one if I really needed it but Its not like there is a gun to every household like other countries.
Maybe in America you could do some damage, get martial law declared, get innocent people caught in the crossfire. Wreck some havoc for the system. Be cool, be James bond. Live your fantasy.
Truth is you will die in the end, same as all the others who think they could take on TPTB.
You might even get your whole town bombed.
Originally posted by bikeshedding
Revolution is not the best choice by any means -- it is the last choice.
Originally posted by bikeshedding
I'd just like to note the very obvious fact that poorly armed revolutionaries in Afghanistan have combated a larger and better equipped force for nearly a decade now. All this "you can't win against tanks and planes" crap is just crap. When our troops finally leave that country, they will leave as unsuccessful as the Soviet Union did. Anyone who thinks the American people couldn't do something similar in their own country just lacks tactical imagination.
Rarely have I seen such a display of cowardice and defeatism in one thread as in this one. It's shameful. While I'm not advocating revolution at the moment, it is a valid option, granted to us by our founders. If your technology is insufficient to battle an "occupying force," and you cannot upgrade the technology, then adapt your tactics accordingly. Everything and everyone on this planet has a weakness. All you have to do is find it and exploit it to your advantage.
That being said, all other options should be exhausted before making this difficult decision.
edit on 5-12-2010 by bikeshedding because: Rephrase