It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Cassius666
reply to post by pteridine
Me answering those questions and showing how clever I am? I am not the one who is delusional. Did you even bother to read my post? I think not.
Also I got confused, who is wrong when he says he found thermite? Basile, Herrit, Jones, Griscom? All of them?
This is what I wrote
I am quite sure you are convinced you do. Like I said if thinking that makes you happy more power to you. It aint like he is the first one.
www.youtube.com...
Now he didnt publish a paper in a peer reviewed magazine, but Herrit did. But that means Herrit is not alone. I am sure those are just more people lying because they are out for fame and glory. If those are happy thoughts to you, well, may they make you happy. So its chemical engineer vs conspiracyguy on ATS board. Oh gee I wonder how that one will turn out . You think you can debunk herrits paper? Make it official. Unless you run into a chemical engineer or the like on here I dont think anybody can judge if Herrits paper has been debunked or not based on the half page you wrote. There I saved you a whole lot of unproductive effort. You can thank me later
Originally posted by pteridine2. How could Jones tell the difference between burning and thermite reactions in the DSC?
A thermitic reaction is noted by the redox reaction between iron oxide and aluminum. The product is
metallic spheres
Originally posted by pteridineThe combustion is the ONLY reaction we are sure of. Paint burns. Everything else is a maybe.
The aluminium reduces the oxide of another metal, most commonly iron oxide, because aluminium is highly reactive:
Fe2O3 + 2Al → 2Fe + Al2O3 + Heat
The products are aluminium oxide, free elemental iron,[2] and a large amount of heat.
formation of iron–aluminates (hercynite) and iron; (iv) for the over aluminized mixtures, incorporation of Al into the iron–aluminates takes place with the formation of iron and alumina and, in parallel, Al reacts with iron to produce intermetallics.
There is a list of pretty easy and cheap experiment Jones could do after which he would make a very strong case. It would silence tons of critique and would give those experts no other choice than to take his work seriously. He neglects to do those experiment. For me that causes huge alarm bells to ring. He wants to convince the world of his hypothesis, but he refuses to perform the experiments the world is asking him to do, for no apparent reason. Currently he basically only convinces people who were already convinced.
Originally posted by -PLB-
reply to post by impressme
The only fact I see is that people who believe in Jones paper won't even accept there is any flaw in the paper. I would like you to address a post I made earlier:
There is a list of pretty easy and cheap experiment Jones could do after which he would make a very strong case. It would silence tons of critique and would give those experts no other choice than to take his work seriously. He neglects to do those experiment. For me that causes huge alarm bells to ring. He wants to convince the world of his hypothesis, but he refuses to perform the experiments the world is asking him to do, for no apparent reason. Currently he basically only convinces people who were already convinced.
Why doesn't he perform the tests that would silence the critics, among which are renowned experts in that field?
Originally posted by Cassius666
We must have readed different polls then. Here is a whole host of them if you scroll down en.wikipedia.org...
No boy it isnt about us accepting if there is any flaw or not in the paper, it is about the fact that unless pepertdine is lucky enough to run into somone with an PHD nobody can really follow his reasoning. He is conspiracyguy on ATS board. So in 2001 when some people posted it was odd what they saw it was like all, you are no expert, you are just some guy on the board, then experts came forward, a lot of them and they published papers.
When the official story is backed up, experts > conspiracyguy, when the experts challenge the official story, experts < conspiracyguy.
All I am saying is he wont find the discussion he is looking for on here, therefore he can stop waisting his time, seek out peers with the necessary education to go over the paper with, either online by posting on an appropriate board and publicly challenge the paper or offline.
I did not start calling the official story into doubt just because some guy on the internets said so. It will take more than conspiracyguy to convince me the official conspiracy theory is conspiracy fact.