It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by ommadawn
1.its only wikileaks that have broken the law here?
No. The information appears to have been stolen by someone else and handed to them so far as I understand it.
They (Wikileaks) are the Publisher of apparently stolen info.
2. the govenment has never broken the law and tryed to hide it?
I did not say that.
3. calls of asasination are against the human rights and hauge court rulings but ok for journalists?
Who is calling for that?
4. if evedence of a crime is discovered it must be reported or it is a crime but what happens if the govenment is the perpre trator of this crime?
Appears to be two issues in that question. So far as I know, a crime has been reported, and a named individual associated with that. Innocent until proven guilty of course. But the crime appears to exist and by all accounts the 'stolen data'. Evidence of that by inspection of the Public Domain record.
5. do you really beleive the govenment is above the law?
My beliefs a very personal and not for public discussion, such is my freedom of choice.
Originally posted by IntastellaBurst
It's basicaly translated to " Don't Read it " lol.
But did it say anything about consequences ??
How would they even know if any employee's are reading these ??
Sounds like the captains trying to avoid a Mutiny, but in the end their only blowing smoke.
Originally posted by IntastellaBurst
How would they even know if any employee's are reading these ??