reply to post by mistafaz
Now hold up just a second.
I've read through your posts on the thread with a double opinion. Firstly, you have come across as rational, sensible, and decent, and your stated
objective (to collate and disseminate info on emerging police states) is admirable and to be encouraged, especially if - as you claim - you work in
'law enforcement' and are in a position to do something, anything, about it all.
But when you start making grand, sweeping statements about the OPs mental health - well that's where I think you need to step off a bit. You're
making assumptions based on next to zero data, and no observational merits other than the second-language posting of a man who could well be targeted
in some way - and possibly NOT in the way he believes. The things described by him in this thread, and the allusions from another poster, to another
thread in the past made by SmokingMan - about feeling targeted by MIBs (a useful descriptive term for unknown and mysterious suited observers) - as
well as some of the first responses to this thread, make me wonder if he very well isn't being manipulated already.
Buzzing noises, tinnitus, delusions (or not) of persecution and malicious online activity directed against him. Sounds like it could be
schizophrenia, or a genuine experimental torture case. Or something in between. But whichever way, neither of us is in a position to state with any
clarity precisely what is happening to him.
So please, stop throwing out pronouncements about the mental health of ATS users, when you literally don't know them from Adam, and obviously haven't
done your homework when it comes to the type of games our most secretive overlords like to play to while away their 3D experience with all their
sackloads of money & power.
A quick googlewhack on 'Through-the-wall technologies' should do for starters. Paranoid schizophrenia is a label for a particular form of brain
damage, which can arise naturally, or artificially. There are critical methods of determining which is applicable in any given situation, but these
cannot generally be conclusive without face-to-face interview and monitoring. And the monitoring part can exacerbate the condition (well 'duh'..)
So in conclusion of my rant, I agree with and admire your intended aim (exposing police states), but I dislike your targeting of the OP. And by
dismissing him, you may be dismissing one piece of the puzzle needed to help you in your quest.
edit on 4-12-2010 by FlyInTheOintment because: sentence had a missing word...