It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

US facing attacks by 'home-grown terrorists', senior adviser warns

page: 2
11
<< 1    3 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Dec, 4 2010 @ 09:05 AM
link   
reply to post by DimensionalDetective
 


Anyone who reads can tell this can tell it is a big fat lie:



"Three days ago, Napolitano told an audience at Arizona State University that the border is more secure than ever," said Tancredo. "I challenge her-no I dare her to come to this community and try to sell that lie. The residents here know better."
...
Tancredo said Border Patrol in the Arizona region confirmed a 25 percent increase in apprehensions over the past three months of which 20 percent of those caught have criminal backgrounds.


“Ranchers and residents all along our southern border with Mexico have been living in fear for years as more armed smugglers and criminals cross their property on their illegal journeys north,” said Jeff Schwilk founder of the San Diego Minutemen. “The murder of Rob Krentz was inevitable as the drug war in Mexico spills across our border. But it could easily have been prevented. Mr. Krentz's blood is on the hands of Barack Obama, George Bush, Harry Reid, John McCain and all the other traitors in Washington who have refused to secure our southern border after all these years.”

[RANCHER shot]
The Arizona rancher waged a 10-year battle against thousands of illegal immigrants who crossed into the country and onto his property. When Barrett stopped 16 Mexican Nationals at gunpoint on his land, the ACLU stepped in and brought a civil rights lawsuit against the Arizona rancher.

Local law enforcement officers refer to Barrett’s ranch as the “avenue of choice” for illegal immigrants to enter America illegally. Barrett put up with property damage, death of livestock and numerous home invasions.

The ACLU claimed in the lawsuit against Barrett that he inflicted emotional distress by holding the migrants at gunpoint, threatening to turn his dog loose and shooting anyone who attempted to escape.

The Arizona rancher lost his case.


The jury awarded $7,500 each in actual damages to two of the plaintiffs for the The Arizona rancher lost his case.


The jury awarded $7,500 each in actual damages to two of the plaintiffs for the infliction of emotional distress and $1,400 each to two others for assault for a total of $78,000.


SO people entering this country ILLEGALLY can sue for "infliction of emotional distress" and win in court but an American getting "groped" has no such recourse.


And here is the real clincher:



THE FBI VISIT

On June 30, 2005, federal law enforcement officials finally descended upon Islamberg but not to make arrests or to investigate the reports of gunfire and explosions. They rather make the trek to the compound to take part in a communal picnic in honor of the Muslim Boy Scouts of America....
www.jihadwatch.org...


Now WHY would anyone believe Grope-N-Fly is about concern for terrorism.




posted on Dec, 4 2010 @ 09:15 AM
link   
Oh. This again, circa 2002, 2004, 2005, 2007, and so on.. Seems like this is another little pill that comes in time-released capsule form, doesn't it? Depending on who needs money for what programs or is selling what prescriptions or stirring what fear. "Home-grown" terrorism's been tracked since at least the early 1900s, so what's the real news here? That someone else said it?


And yeah...I sort of agree with crimvelvet...the hypocrisy from "government officials" is sort of hard to reconcile. Guess that's what happens when people are myopic.
edit on 12/4/2010 by ~Lucidity because: to add agreement



posted on Dec, 4 2010 @ 09:29 AM
link   
reply to post by impressme
 





I believe Americans are now waking up ...

Our politicians sold America down the river for more profits to foreign interests and slave wages.

Now these people who are supposed to represent our interest in congress are worried that there could be an up rising, I wonder why.


You are correct




Just 29% of Likely U.S. Voters now say the country is heading in the right direction, according to a new Rasmussen Reports.. taken the week ending Sunday, November 28....

Among all voters, confidence in the nation's current course has been hovering around the 30% mark since last November....

Sixty-seven percent (67%) of voters say the country is heading down the wrong track...

Leading up to President Obama's inauguration in January 2009, the number of voters who felt the country was heading in the right direction remained below 20%. The week of his inauguration, voter confidence rose to 27% and then steadily increased to 40% in early May 2009. Confidence began falling after that.

Eighty-eight percent (88%) of the Political Class believe the United States is generally heading in the right direction, up significantly from last week, while 85% of Mainstream voters think the country is going down the wrong track.

[This is interesting]
Most black voters (69%) still believe the country is heading in the right direction. Though that number had been dropping steadily,....
SOURCE


Sure looks like Americans are waking up even the Democrat "owned" blacks.



posted on Dec, 4 2010 @ 09:53 AM
link   

Originally posted by gnosticquasar
You know, I just started reading "1984" yesterday, but somehow I already know that I will find similar rhetoric in that book.
Now read Huxley's Brave New World. That one is even scarier



posted on Dec, 4 2010 @ 09:55 AM
link   
reply to post by Fractured.Facade
 





...The way to defeat the USA is from within, through terror and economic destruction. Great strategists and enemies of the west have a plan. Obviously they have seen the effectiveness of 9/11 and plan to expand on that...


The plan goes all the way back to 1913 and beyond. Kissinger stated it precisely in 1970.
Who controls the food supply controls the people; who controls the energy can control whole continents; who controls money can control the world.

I suggest you read the background I posted in these threads. (I got lazy)
Food
Money
"Global Warming" and Cap & Trade are of course the third.

In Sept. 14, 1994 David Rockefeller, speaking at the UN Business Council,.
"This present window of opportunity, during which a truly peaceful and interdependent world order might be built, will not be open for too long - We are on the verge of a global transformation. All we need is the right major crisis and the nations will accept the New World Order."

In 1995 we got the World Trade Organization and the mass exodus of US business.
Statistics (courtesy of Bridgewater) showed in 1990,before WTO was ratified, Foreign ownership of U.S. assets amounted to 33% of U.S. GDP. By 2002 this had increased to over 70% of U.S. GDP. www.fame.org...

If you go to the US census and dig (they changed the reporting format to make it difficult) You will find:
As percentage of work force from Census figures: (Education is % of the population)
.........................In 1970......In 2006
Manufacturing.....24.0%.....10.2% (1996)
Education.............4.4%.......1.1% (1996)
Government........14.9%.......16.9% (FED)


Manufacturing as of June 2010 -11,670,000 or 7.58%

lost 1,962,000 manufacturing jobs since 1996. (World Trade Organization)

WORSE look at who the top employers are:


The largest American employer is, by far, the United States federal government with over four million employees worldwide. Wal-Mart, the retailing giant follows with 1.8 million employees.

#2 - Kelly Temps -750,000
#3 - McDonald's - 465,000 ...

#5 - IBM - Computer Hardware - 355,766

#8 - Citigroup - 337,000
#9 General Electric - Leasing & Finance - 319,000
jobs.lovetoknow.com...


Of the top ten only IBM actually manufactures anything. A country must produce actual products to create real wealth. Spain with its rape of new world gold found that one out the hard way.



posted on Dec, 4 2010 @ 10:02 AM
link   

Originally posted by aliengenes
next it will be a terrorist act to vote
Against the powers that be you mean. If you vote for a third party, or an independent. You can freely vote republican or democrat.



posted on Dec, 4 2010 @ 10:26 AM
link   
reply to post by sonofliberty1776
 


You are so right.

That is why they branded "Ron Paul, Bob Barr and Chuck Baldwin as potential terrorists" and quickly moved to rope the Tea Party and haul it into the republican party. The media was also quick to brand it Racist, Religious Right, Whites only... to scare off any normal people from the center or left who might have wanted to take a look at it.

Ain't propaganda wonderful when you OWN the media?



posted on Dec, 4 2010 @ 10:45 AM
link   

Originally posted by gnosticquasar
You know, I just started reading "1984" yesterday, but somehow I already know that I will find similar rhetoric in that book.


You will discover that Winston and the Seattle Bomber had something very much in common.



posted on Dec, 4 2010 @ 10:46 AM
link   

Originally posted by sonofliberty1776

Originally posted by aliengenes
next it will be a terrorist act to vote
Against the powers that be you mean. If you vote for a third party, or an independent. You can freely vote republican or democrat.


It is also possible not to vote at all

might be an interesting tactic



posted on Dec, 4 2010 @ 11:04 AM
link   
The OP and the researchers were right.

There are INDEED terrorists in the nation.

But they are not the common people.

They are those who had been empowered by the masses through the sacred vote, hard fought by thousands of forefathers who gave their lives so that future generations may be free, but only to be elected to serve other masters than rather masses, who pursue only their masters' agenda instead of the masses, to keep the citizens in the dark through mickey mouse song and dance routines, lies and deception of a massive scale, pedophillic TSA freely molesting our innocent kids and loved ones, Homeland security emboldened with freedom to authocratically rule free citizens lives, and the worst of all, even horrifyingly sending thousands of our young courageous youths to die in foriegn lands, their blood soaked into hot desert sands in the setting sun, for nothing other than to line the masters wallets........

So much hope had been in the hearts of foundings fathers.....they would have weep terribly if they know what their blood had been shed and created......



posted on Dec, 4 2010 @ 11:05 AM
link   
They need to step up their measures to prevent muslim inbreeding in america.

I believe they've already prevented them marrying cousins but now they just go to pakistan to get married. They need to stamp this out and when they're less inbred their irrational and illogical hatreds will decrease.



posted on Dec, 4 2010 @ 11:29 AM
link   

Originally posted by asperetty

Originally posted by sonofliberty1776

Originally posted by aliengenes
next it will be a terrorist act to vote
Against the powers that be you mean. If you vote for a third party, or an independent. You can freely vote republican or democrat.


It is also possible not to vote at all

might be an interesting tactic
Actually, I read somewhere recently that the largest single voting bloc out there is the non voter. I will dig for a link.


Another aspect of the 2008 election that was true to form with previous presidential elections is the number of non-voters significantly exceeded the winning candidates vote total. In the last 100 years the non-voters have “won” every presidential election. One hundred million people chose not to vote in 2008 – 43% of possible voters – while the “winning” Democratic candidate received only 3 in 10 possible votes. So the non-voters won the election by 44%, and 7 out of 10 possible voters rejected the candidate elected president! 2

The non-voters huge 44% margin of victory in 2008 was not an anomaly. It was identical to the non-voters victory margin 172 years earlier in the 1836 election when Martin Van Buren was elected president. It was also only slightly less than the non-voters historical average 49% margin of victory in a presidential election. 3

A notable aspect of the non-voters overwhelming 2008 victory is it was accomplished without a single radio, television or print media political advertisement, or a single stump speech or gathering encouraging people not to vote. Thus the cost per non-voter was $0.00. In contrast the Democratic presidential campaign in 2008 spent $10.51 per vote to finish second, while the Republican presidential campaign spent $5.51 per vote in their third place effort.


forejustice.org...

Just google it, there are lots more links you could read.
edit on 4-12-2010 by sonofliberty1776 because: To add link and quote



posted on Dec, 4 2010 @ 03:18 PM
link   
reply to post by crimvelvet
 


All part of a master plan by the ultimate allied enemies of the USA.

Они будут заняты С охотой привидения и будет серьезно ослаблены и уязвимых.

方便联盟和经济团结一致是至关重要,我们的胜利和联合全球统治。



Economic solidarity, recent agreement to eliminate trade with the dollar.

Meanwhile, preparation by "domestic (homegrown) terrorists continues.....



Good luck America.



edit on 4-12-2010 by Fractured.Facade because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 4 2010 @ 04:30 PM
link   
Yep.. Theyre in washington d.c and call themselves president, senater and congressman the biggest terrorists in the world...



posted on Dec, 4 2010 @ 06:27 PM
link   
Nice little write-up I came across which also talks about this endless fear-mongering agenda and how tptb use it to scare us into submitting all of our rights:


The United States of Fear

Of course, the U.S. national security state has quite a different formula for engendering safety in America: fight the Afghan War until hell freezes over; keep the odd base or two in Iraq; dig into the Persian Gulf region; send U.S. Special Operations troops into any country where a terrorist might possibly lurk; and make sure the drones aren't far behind. In other words, reinforce our war state by ensuring that we're eternally in a state of war, and then scare the hell out of Americans by repeatedly insisting that we're in imminent danger, that shoe, underwear, and someday butt bombers will destroy our country, our lives, and our civilization. Insist that a single percent of risk is 1% too much when it comes to terror and American lives, and then demand that those who feel otherwise be dealt with punitively, if they won't shut up.

It's a formula for leaving you naked in airports, while increasing the oppressive power of the state. And here's the dirty, little, distinctly Orwellian secret: the national security state can't do without those Yemeni terrorists (and vice versa), as well as our homegrown variety. All of them profit from a world of war. You don't – and on that score, what happens in an airport line should be the least of your worries.


www.lewrockwell.com...



posted on Dec, 4 2010 @ 08:35 PM
link   
reply to post by DimensionalDetective
 


Interesting material.

Far from the reality we will face.

Maybe feds should consider raising the terror alert level to the highest sometime before June of 2011?




posted on Dec, 4 2010 @ 08:55 PM
link   
"Homeland" = "Fatherland" = Nazi

I have hated the term "Homeland Security" since I first heard it, and almost vomited.

"National Security" was always perfectly fine, thank you.

Sich Hiel!! Amerika, uber alles!!

As my old hippie friend used to say before he died, "Don't let 'em Hitlerize ya, man!'"

JR



posted on Dec, 4 2010 @ 09:00 PM
link   
reply to post by JR MacBeth
 


Semantics!

It really doesn't matter what you call it, our home-land is neither safe or secure.

They will soon need a new name... How about...

Department of Epic Security Failure

?



posted on Dec, 4 2010 @ 09:35 PM
link   
A wasted word to the Obama administration....

With all of the failures and negativity aimed at your administration to date... Do you really want this to happen on your watch?

You had better get busy on the home-front of this war, secure the borders, pool all resources and agencies to hunt down, infiltrate and disrupt "domestic terrorist cells" profiling is essential, internationally you must launch an all out unrelenting economic war, crush your enemies before they crush you.

Or do nothing and witness the destruction of the USA and watch as what is left of this once greatest nation and world leader is reduced to third world status.

Obama was president when?



MBF

posted on Dec, 4 2010 @ 10:36 PM
link   
Who determines who is a home grown terrorist? They could just be people that have been ran over by the government so much that they have had all they are going to take. THERE ARE A PILE OF CRIMINALS IN GOVERNMENT!!!!!



new topics

top topics



 
11
<< 1    3 >>

log in

join