It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Xcathdra
reply to post by mother1138
Information pertaining to UFO / ET though in my opinion transcends any one government having control over that information. ET contact will fall into the realm of Diplomatic relations with Earth, and not just one country of Earth.
Originally posted by mother1138
Hey, that's a fantastic point That is a more global chunk of information and is for the world at large.
Forgive me for asking a hypothetical question but... But what happens if/when a global government is formed -- would such a UFO document dump be somehow wrong then?
Originally posted by mother1138
reply to post by Xcathdra
Oh, and here is an article about the Oct document dump having information about Iraq still having WMDs. Like I said, not huge stockpiles. I guess I just think that from information like to UFOs or anything in between; governments have no right to keeping information under lock and key.
On a less politically-charged note, a massive UFO document dump would be freaking amazing.
Originally posted by Xcathdra
Failing to release this type of information is denying humanity the God given right to take our place among the stars as neighbors to other entities. Failure to release ET information perpetuates humans ability to to continue acting in the manner of being distrustful of each other, which continues the cycle of war, famine, technology hinderance, land claims etc etc.
Originally posted by stonhans
Some people belive that Julian Assange is "hired" by CIA or connected to another agency inside the government, and since ATS members write about him possibly leaking UFO files in the future. When you add together this with all the other UFO related things we've heard about the last few months (including the nuclear conference). Now, If Assange is working for the government: Could all this be a part of a a soft disclosure before something big might happen?edit on 4/12/2010 by stonhans because: (no reason given)