It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by boondock-saint
what is ur relationship to bib ???
How r u getting the info I shared
with him in our U2U ???
Originally posted by Alethea
I have no idea what you are talking about or what info you are referring to. Care to articulate?
Originally posted by boondock-saint
Originally posted by Alethea
Obviously George Soros got a better education.
I wouldn't call a Popper education,
a better education.
More like an indoctrination !!!
And I want to know ur relationship status
with backinblack ???
and the reason why I ask this is because
of something you type which bib and I have
discussed only by U2U and you happen to
bring it up here in this thread twice.
it is NOT a coincidence.
what is ur relationship to bib ???
How r u getting the info I shared
with him in our U2U ???
Originally posted by thecinic
It is obvious who the wiki leak fan boys are, their crazy trolling of any thread that is wiki leak related is absolutely funny. They all hone in on it, they are told to bark they bark.
These wiki trolls attack people personally for their opinion.
It is obvious to everyone who does not have wool over their eyes what wiki leaks is doing.
Wiki leaks and Assange
YOU HAVE BEEN EXPOSED STOP USING THESE GOOD PEOPLE AS TOOLS AND PAWNS IN YOUR CHESS GAME!!
Stop trying to get our web censored wiki leaks we see right through you!!!
Originally posted by backinblack
Heeelloooooo, anyone left??
Seems very quiet for such an important thread..
Originally posted by boondock-saint
Originally posted by Alethea
I have no idea what you are talking about or what info you are referring to. Care to articulate?
No, I do not care to articulate
cuz u already know.
Follow the bread crumbsedit on 12/27/2010 by boondock-saint because: (no reason given)
the Soros connection turns up in six separate WL relationships:
■Its Chinese and pro-Tibetan volunteers/advisors, some of whom worked at Soros connected Radio Free Asia and National Endowment for Democracy
■Its connection through Hrafnsson to IMMI, considered by many to be a stalking horse for Soros in Iceland
■Its connection to Jonsdottir and her Tibetan advocacy, which parallels objectives of Radio Free Asia and OSI
■Assange’s and MacFadyen’s sponsorship by the Open Society Institute, with its pro-Tibetan positions
■Frontline Club’s funding by the Open Society Institute
■Direct requests by WL in 2007 for funding from the National Endowment for Democracy and Freedom House, both CIA connected. (Note: Open Society Foundation denies funding WikiLeaks).
In Old Norse, áss (or ǫ́ss, ás, plural æsir; feminine ásynja, plural ásynjur) is the term denoting a member of the principal groups of gods of the pantheon of Norse paganism.
en.wikipedia.org...
Originally posted by Alethea
Scriptures reveal that in the last days of this empire, the Archangel Michael will return as both the destroyer and the protector. Some claim that Michael is also Jesus. What the scriptures really mean is NOT that some fantasy creature with wings will be floating down here to fix everything. What it does mean is that someone having the heart of Jesus, or the characteristics representative of Archangel Michael.
WikiLeaks traffics in transparency. Yet as an organization, it masks its organizational structure, funding sources, and sometimes, its members’ real names. One source in the industry, who asked for anonymity, citing fear of client retaliation, says Hrafnsson has got to step out and explain WikiLeaks’ methodology. Levick offers a similar thought: “Are they just going to be an organization that demands transparency and yet simultaneously they themselves do not believe in transparency?” To alleviate these concerns, and others that they have something sinister to hide, Hrafnsson needs to disclose who is calling shots and who is paying the bills.
Originally posted by boondock-saint
quite a nice spiel u laid out.
However irrelevant it may be.
Both Assange and Soros have claimed
to be atheists.
Originally posted by boondock-saint
Now why would Jesus come back through Michael
claiming to be Assange or Soros and strictly
claim to be atheist ???
Originally posted by boondock-saint
He wouldn't. When Jesus was here last time,
he even said he was the son of God.
When he comes back, it won't be based
on some highly speculative theory based around
a billionaire and a hacker who shudders when
God is mentioned and denies the very existence
of God.
Originally posted by boondock-saint
Kinda blows the Soros/Assange savior theory out
of the water does it not ???
On 15 March 2010, WikiLeaks released a secret 32-page U.S. Department of Defense Counterintelligence Analysis Report from March 2008. The document described some prominent reports leaked on the website which related to U.S. security interests and described potential methods of marginalizing the organization.
A Wikileaks.org spokesperson stated in early January 2007 that about 22 persons are
involved in the Open Society Initiative to make governments and corporations more accountable
to the citizens of the world. Wikileaks intends to seek funding from individual persons and
groups such as humanitarian organizations that fund sociopolitical activity intended to promote
democracy and human rights around the world through open access to government and business information.
Efforts by some domestic and foreign personnel and
organizations to discredit the Wikileaks.org Web site include allegations that it wittingly allows
the posting of uncorroborated information, serves as an instrument of propaganda, and is a front
organization of the US Central Intelligence Agency (CIA)
Anyone can post information to the Wikileaks.org Web site, and there is no editorial
review or oversight to verify the accuracy of any information posted to the Web site. Persons
accessing the Web site can form their own opinions regarding the accuracy of the information
posted, and they are allowed to post comments. This raises the possibility that the Wikileaks.org
Web site could be used to post fabricated information; to post misinformation, disinformation,
and propaganda; or to conduct perception management and influence operations designed to
convey a negative message to those who view or retrieve information from the Web site.
The possibility that a current employee or mole within DoD or elsewhere in the US
government is providing sensitive information or classified information to Wikileaks.org cannot
be ruled out.
Wikileaks.org, a publicly accessible Internet Web site, represents a potential force
protection, counterintelligence, operational security (OPSEC), and information security
(INFOSEC) threat to the US Army.