Originally posted by doom27
What if George Soros is in charge of everything, he is attempting to gain power to take the world. What if this is all true?
Now the punchline.
What if he is doing it for the good of us? What if this is all a plan to save the world? Why must we point fingers and say he is wrong for tring to obtain power?
This reminds me of a Japanese story...
The world is controlled by 3 superpowers, Britannia, The EU, and the Chinese Republic. Britannia has taken over Japan and turned it into a Britannian colony. The japaneese try to fight back but are inferior. Then a former Britannian prince who was expelled to japan takes action. Because he could not gain the trust of the japaneese people for they hated the britannians, he wore a mask and took on the identity of Zero. By using Zero he used an manipulated the people around him, eventually left to help the Chinese Rebupic, to gain thier trust. After gaining independence, his followers found that they were just pawns, in his quest for power to overtake britannia. They revealed zero as the britannian he was, and exiled him. Zero then used his power to take control of britannia itself, murder the king, and take his heir to the throne. He was an evil king, even worse than the one before, and took his followers from before captive. Then is a mass public execution, instead of killing the enemies, it was found that this was the plan all along. He masked someone else as Zero and had him Kill him, thus, giving hope to the people that Zero was real, and changing the world.
What if this is a real life version of this story? What if George wants to save the world? Who are we to say anything, we are humans, we have no right to say we understand anything.
Originally posted by boondock-saint
Releasing incriminating data on Bank of America
does help it's competitors when it falls. It allows
the competitors to buy up stock shares and assets
for almost nothing.
It can also influence the stock markets around the world
in the same way.
Originally posted by Quantum Logic
reply to post by boondock-saint
The only thing I can say is...........you're kidding, right? All of the posts you have made supporting him and referencing him, and now all of a sudden, "Oh, wait- he's NWO"?
The family changed its name from Schwartz to Soros in 1936, in response to growing anti-semitism with the rise of fascism. Tivadar liked the new name because it is a palindrome and has a meaning. Although the specific meaning is left unstated in Kaufman's biography, in Hungarian, soros means next in line, or designated successor; and, in Esperanto, it means "will soar". Tivadar taught George to speak Esperanto from birth. George Soros later said that he grew up in a Jewish home and that his parents were cautious with their religious roots.
Originally posted by TruthSeeker8300
When speaking about terrorist's, you don't state the FACT that most terrorist's are Muslim. Most of what you said is just your own opinion without evidence. Wikileaks has been around quite a while before these leaks ever came. Their website contains many things that I find interesting. Such as a secret recording from a Mormon initiation. There are many useful things on Wikileaks and those of you that bash it have no proof to back it up and you just make yourself look real silly and give a bad name to those that only want the truth. There's no room for rumor's, beliefs, what you think. It doesn't matter what you think. All that matter's is if what you think is based on real research.
Originally posted by archasama
reply to post by backinblack
So Soros - NWO, Banksters - NWO, Zionists - NWO, Politicians - NWO.
If that's true then is OP saying that there's a war among NWO itself?
It's like a conspiracy in conspiracy in conspiracy... ???