It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Wikileaks Exposed - The man behind the NWO Curtain

page: 57
203
<< 54  55  56    58  59  60 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Dec, 23 2010 @ 05:01 PM
link   

Originally posted by backinblack
One German Bank states they have processed thousands of donations..

thousands are a long way
from millions.

so u interjected fallacy
into this thread and claim
I have an agenda ????
pfffft

u lied to prove ur point
which makes ur point moot
as well as ur stance




posted on Dec, 23 2010 @ 05:14 PM
link   

Originally posted by boondock-saint

Originally posted by backinblack
One German Bank states they have processed thousands of donations..

thousands are a long way
from millions.

so u interjected fallacy
into this thread and claim
I have an agenda ????
pfffft

u lied to prove ur point
which makes ur point moot
as well as ur stance


lol, man you are funny..What a crock...
I simply pointed out one source says thousands, where's the lie?
So how many people do you think have donated a few bucks to wiki??



posted on Dec, 23 2010 @ 05:25 PM
link   

Originally posted by boondock-saint




And then Ron Paul comes out and praises wikileaks.
It's one thing to praise free speech and truth, but
to endorse the organization associated with
Soros is political suicide in the next election.
Bad move Dr. Paul. Hidden agendas are coming
to light.

Also another note:
Ron Paul wants to end the FED.
So does Soros.

However, the difference between the 2 is that
Paul wants the US Treasury to take it's place.
But Soros wants that task to be assigned
to a new world order international bank
owned by the rothschilds.

So I forsee Soros using Dr. Paul to help
end the FED, then a hostile takeover by
Soros to enforce globalism in the
financial sector.

Using your enemy to work for you
til the hard part is done, then tossing
them to the side. As long as Paul helps
Soros in that endeavor then Paul is in
no danger from Soros.

Ironically enough, Paul was just elected
to oversee the FED. How convenient for
Soros ???


This is an intense thread, Boondock. I really appreciate your analytical mind. You have done a lot of research and thinking on this and have a very good insight to the psychological plays involved here.



posted on Dec, 23 2010 @ 05:32 PM
link   

Originally posted by backinblack
reply to post by boondock-saint
 



And then Ron Paul comes out and praises wikileaks.
It's one thing to praise free speech and truth, but
to endorse the organization associated with
Soros is political suicide in the next election.
Bad move Dr. Paul. Hidden agendas are coming
to light.


I think you will lose a lot of allies by dragging Ron Paul into your fantasy...
He has done nothing but support the people and the constitution..



Which is why he's defending WL! Anyone who's not a totally brainwashed wanna-be patriot can see that WL is a GOOD thing for freedom of speech and freedom/justice in general.



posted on Dec, 23 2010 @ 05:34 PM
link   

Originally posted by Alethea
This is an intense thread, Boondock. I really appreciate your analytical mind. You have done a lot of research and thinking on this and have a very good insight to the psychological plays involved here.

lol

well I will agree with ya on that observation.
I was born with an analytical mind.

Even though I am a self proclaimed
redneck, don't confuse that with being
stupid


All my life I have been the type to
tear stuff up just to see how it works.
And I seem to be doing the same thing
on certain topics these days when I feel
the topic is worthwhile to pursue.

And an earth changing entity like wikileaks
is well worth pursuing IMO. The very future of
our country may rest on how enlightened
we are about the current players and their
agendas.

edit on 12/23/2010 by boondock-saint because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 23 2010 @ 05:36 PM
link   
I think it's kinda hilarious that people keep on repeating blatant lies about Soros that have been debunked just one page ago...that's some good brainwashing right there, someone stole those guys' eyesight as well


Someone photoshop a Soros as Grinch who stole Xmas pic



posted on Dec, 23 2010 @ 05:37 PM
link   

Originally posted by MrXYZ
Anyone who's not a totally brainwashed wanna-be patriot can see that WL is a GOOD thing for freedom of speech and freedom/justice in general.


and that is EXACTLY what Soros wants
all of us to think. We won't feel the noose,
til it tightens around our necks. Then it will be
too late to do anything about it. Which is what
Soros is counting on



posted on Dec, 23 2010 @ 05:40 PM
link   

Originally posted by boondock-saint

Originally posted by MrXYZ
Anyone who's not a totally brainwashed wanna-be patriot can see that WL is a GOOD thing for freedom of speech and freedom/justice in general.


and that is EXACTLY what Soros wants
all of us to think. We won't feel the noose,
til it tightens around our necks. Then it will be
too late to do anything about it. Which is what
Soros is counting on



Ok, let's make this really simple. Please make a 1-10 list of what bothers you about Soros, concrete accusations I mean. Entertain us


I'm not talking about vague bull# accusations btw, I want you to list concrete stuff you hate about him. Make sure you do your research before posting

edit on 23-12-2010 by MrXYZ because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 23 2010 @ 05:44 PM
link   

Originally posted by MrXYZ


Yes, more research is clearly required from you as you so obviously buy Beck's lies without checking the facts yourself


It is time while it is obvious someone needs get out of that tiny mind and think out of the box.

Glenn Beck has an entire staff (20-30 people) that researches this data for hours upon hours a day.

The information is very correct, if one would just remove the veil from their wiki-eyes they could see this..

Wiki-leaks is straight from the pits of hell deep inside Soros deranged mind.



posted on Dec, 23 2010 @ 05:53 PM
link   

Originally posted by thecinic

Originally posted by MrXYZ


Yes, more research is clearly required from you as you so obviously buy Beck's lies without checking the facts yourself


It is time while it is obvious someone needs get out of that tiny mind and think out of the box.

Glenn Beck has an entire staff (20-30 people) that researches this data for hours upon hours a day.

The information is very correct, if one would just remove the veil from their wiki-eyes they could see this..

Wiki-leaks is straight from the pits of hell deep inside Soros deranged mind.


Dude, check 1 page back, I posted like 25 of his blatant lies with sources as backup...and the sources list even more. Obviously if you refuse to look at facts, discussing with you about as pointless as watching paint dry



posted on Dec, 23 2010 @ 06:04 PM
link   

Originally posted by MrXYZ
Dude, check 1 page back, I posted like 25 of his blatant lies with sources as backup...and the sources list even more. Obviously if you refuse to look at facts, discussing with you about as pointless as watching paint dry

dude, there has never been a journalist
that has ever been perfect and never misquoted
or received false information. Or at least, none
that I know of. Newspapers and TV stations
print retractions on a daily basis. Doesn't mean
they should be discredited for every article
afterwards. Thank you for pointing out that
Beck is indeed human and makes mistakes.
We all do from time to time, which is why
I used multiple sources to show my evidence here
in this thread. Beck is only 1 of many.
So you have done no such debunking
by attacking Beck's credibility.



posted on Dec, 23 2010 @ 06:06 PM
link   

Originally posted by thecinic

Originally posted by MrXYZ


Yes, more research is clearly required from you as you so obviously buy Beck's lies without checking the facts yourself


It is time while it is obvious someone needs get out of that tiny mind and think out of the box.

Glenn Beck has an entire staff (20-30 people) that researches this data for hours upon hours a day.

The information is very correct, if one would just remove the veil from their wiki-eyes they could see this..

Wiki-leaks is straight from the pits of hell deep inside Soros deranged mind.


O....M.....G......!!!!!
Now we are to believe EVERYTHING Beck says?????
I nearly lost my breakfast reading that...



posted on Dec, 23 2010 @ 06:08 PM
link   

Originally posted by boondock-saint

Originally posted by MrXYZ
Dude, check 1 page back, I posted like 25 of his blatant lies with sources as backup...and the sources list even more. Obviously if you refuse to look at facts, discussing with you about as pointless as watching paint dry

dude, there has never been a journalist
that has ever been perfect and never misquoted
or received false information. Or at least, none
that I know of. Newspapers and TV stations
print retractions on a daily basis. Doesn't mean
they should be discredited for every article
afterwards. Thank you for pointing out that
Beck is indeed human and makes mistakes.
We all do from time to time, which is why
I used multiple sources to show my evidence here
in this thread. Beck is only 1 of many.
So you have done no such debunking
by attacking Beck's credibility.


There's a big difference between making a mistake once, and to repeat the same mistake (aka lies) over and over and over and over again


I really hope you see this difference...but please don't waste too much time at defending good old Beck...I'm looking forward to your concrete accusations against Soros

edit on 23-12-2010 by MrXYZ because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 23 2010 @ 06:14 PM
link   

Originally posted by MrXYZ
There's a big difference between making a mistake once, and to repeat the same mistake (aka lies) over and over and over and over again


I really hope you see this difference...but please don't waste too much time at defending good old Beck...I'm looking forward to your concrete accusations against Soros


and I hope you really see that the evidence produced here
comes from multiple sources not just Beck.

I don't hate Soros. I don't agree with his
agenda for a one world order. I also don't
agree with a one world super bank run by
the rothschilds. I also don't agree with his
stance to take away our rights to own guns.
I also don't agree with his stance to abolish
the US Constitution. I could go on but I think
the pic is clear why Soros should not be allowed
a hand in reforming the US system.



posted on Dec, 23 2010 @ 06:17 PM
link   
reply to post by boondock-saint
 


Do you see good in ANYTHING Soros has done over the years.?

As for him being against the constitution, most pollies have gone against the constitution for decades now..



posted on Dec, 23 2010 @ 06:18 PM
link   

Originally posted by backinblack
reply to post by boondock-saint
 


But like I said and it's more obvious by your posts, you will NEVER change your mind..



Never say never

Didn't B-S already change his mind? I thought he used to be a WL supporter?
He'll no doubt change his mind again if he finds more compelling evidence for a different theory.

On this subject, I'd rather wait and see, shouldn't be long now before we'll know one way or the other if B-S is full of BS or not

edit on 23/12/10 by RogerT because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 23 2010 @ 06:23 PM
link   
reply to post by RogerT
 


Just because wiki leak fan boys are blinded

by looking at the back of Assanges ass all day,

it does not make wiki leaks anymore credible

because you say/think it is.



posted on Dec, 23 2010 @ 06:24 PM
link   

Originally posted by backinblack
Do you see good in ANYTHING Soros has done over the years.?
As for him being against the constitution, most pollies have gone against the constitution for decades now..

you seem to be under the impression that a couple good deeds
far outweigh a life long agenda of bad ones.
Giving away all ur billions of dollars to charity
when u die has absolutely not rectified how
you stole all that money to begin with.
a few good deeds does not a good man make,
but a lifetime of good deeds shows integrity
which Soros lacks on all fronts.

As far as the pollies not following constitution,
with the likes of Soros blackmailing them
and the threat of death like in JFK, no wonder
they sit by idly and only speak when they are
poked or proded.

It's time to cut the puppeteer strings
once and for all.



posted on Dec, 23 2010 @ 06:28 PM
link   
reply to post by boondock-saint
 



As far as the pollies not following constitution,
with the likes of Soros blackmailing them
and the threat of death like in JFK, no wonder
they sit by idly and only speak when they are
poked or proded.


So now Soros is responsible for JFK also..


I bet he even started WW1...



posted on Dec, 23 2010 @ 06:29 PM
link   
Ahahahahaha, now you connect Soros to JFK's assassination as well...thx for the entertainment mate, I haven't laughed as much in days


Obviously you're not posting any proof once again, but your wild speculation is hilarious. You should write a book!
edit on 23-12-2010 by MrXYZ because: (no reason given)




top topics



 
203
<< 54  55  56    58  59  60 >>

log in

join