It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Wikileaks Exposed - The man behind the NWO Curtain

page: 53
203
<< 50  51  52    54  55  56 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Dec, 17 2010 @ 07:59 PM
link   

Originally posted by boondock-saint

Originally posted by backinblack
I don't see any tangible proof of Julian Assange doing anything wrong in all that has been said in this thread..
Maybe you can point out the facts that lead to Mr Assange's Indictment..



So thusly receiving those documents
with the intent to sabotage, extort
and blackmail is a crime.

Distribution of those documents
with the same intent above is another
crime.

Conspiring with others to sabotage a
country is sedition. If Julian is not a
US Citizen then it becomes an act of
war. It becomes a cyber attack on
US Sovereignty by the entity and
their conspirators, including funding
sources. International espionage
and mass propaganda to illegally direct
foreign policy of a nation is blackmail
and extortion against a nation.

There are many different routes
a prosecutor could go with this case.

Wikileaks could be charged
Julian Assange could be charged
George Soros could be charged



hey boon
i am
cooler than
you, i
only put
two words
per line
instead of
four or
five, i
mean how
cool is
that? BTW
what is
the difference
between you
and a neocon?

oh wait,
there isn't
one. your
reaction to
this is
the exact
same.

you want
to hide
the attrocities
of the
CIA just
like the
neocons.

you want
to hide
the secret
wars, just
like the
neocons.

you want
to prosecute
the messenger
because it
uncovers inconvenient
truths for
you.

congrats.
you are
a neocon,
just like
obama.
edit on 17-12-2010 by FalselyFlagged because: (no reason given)




posted on Dec, 17 2010 @ 08:02 PM
link   
reply to post by FalselyFlagged
 


That was pathetic..
I know why Boon posts that way and it's reasonable..

Try arguing the facts, not that childish BS..
And I don't even agree with Boon on this one..



posted on Dec, 18 2010 @ 02:45 PM
link   

Originally posted by FalselyFlagged

hey boon
i am
cooler than
you, i
only put
two words
per line
instead of
four or
five, i
mean how
cool is
that? BTW
what is
the difference
between you
and a neocon?

oh wait,
there isn't
one. your
reaction to
this is
the exact
same.

you want
to hide
the attrocities
of the
CIA just
like the
neocons.

you want
to hide
the secret
wars, just
like the
neocons.

you want
to prosecute
the messenger
because it
uncovers inconvenient
truths for
you.

congrats.
you are
a neocon,
just like
obama.


This response is the typical argument ad hominem.

I have tried to lay in the shadows, but this brought me out.
Mainly because of the utter nonsense and "perception management" associated with this ludicrous comment.

I personally like the way the Boon posts. I had a situation a while back where my keyboard's comma and period became broken and I was forced to comment in much the same manner as Boon.

If you have a problem with his research, then post a valid argument with links and sources that can be substantiated.
You might be able to shine a new light on this topic, if you have a genuine interest in the topic, but it appears to me that your interest is merely proving an individual wrong (incredibly low sef-esteem perhaps), and I applaud backinblack for noticing this.

If you are unable to formulate a quality argument, then you are of no significance to me at ATS and I will ignore you regardless of the loss of the ignore button, and I suggest others do the same.
After 5 or 6 posts with no responses, then I feel sure that you will get the picture.
Your contributions are not welcom in their present form.

This is about quality debate and discussion and not name calling.
There are plenty of other less than stellar boards who will allow you to do this, but you will not be denying ignorance on those boards, but quite the opposite.

You will be contributing to it.



posted on Dec, 19 2010 @ 05:16 AM
link   
post removed for serious violation of ATS Terms & Conditions



posted on Dec, 19 2010 @ 10:32 AM
link   
Honestly i drank TEA with julian assange and he told me discreetly that his main intent was To make MONEY but the leaks data are officially true! trust me his an average joe.
edit on 19-12-2010 by Wiklleaks because: (no reason given)

edit on 19-12-2010 by Wiklleaks because: (no reason given)

edit on 19-12-2010 by Wiklleaks because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 19 2010 @ 10:42 AM
link   
First of all, Soros did a lot of good by donating a ton (over $7bil) to overthrow communist regimes and to promote free speech and education. Not many people can claim to have donated $4bil in education for former Soviet countries who had no access to proper education before that. He also helped black people get an education during apartheid in South Africa. I know Beck loves to smear his name, but fact is, that guy has done more good than 99.9999999% of those people...and it's laughable to attack someone who donated over $7bil in charity.

Furthermore, given that WL pretty much spat in everyone's face, and the news aren't targeted towards specific people, your whole "theory" is laughable. I think it's sad that the media and a lot of people, including the OP, focus so much on Assange and WL rather than the actual content of the cables. Just shows how brainwashed people are.

Either way, this whole discussion is kinda pointless as you can't stop WL or the movement of free and open information exchange. Welcome to the information age, welcome to the 21st century!!


Cliffnotes:




posted on Dec, 19 2010 @ 12:55 PM
link   
very interesting visual war log , hope this gets viral!!



Official wikileaks youtube channel
www.youtube.com...
edit on 19-12-2010 by Wiklleaks because: (no reason given)

edit on 19-12-2010 by Wiklleaks because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 19 2010 @ 01:44 PM
link   
reply to post by MrXYZ
 


God....

I absolutely despise ridiculous pejorative pictures likened to the one that you have posted.

I feel like I am at the Rant and Rave section of Cragislist. Really. I mean c'mon.
Any credibility that you have garnered disappeared with that picture.

Conspiracy is all around you.
If you don't think that there is a conspiracy to get you to drink Coke, then you are blind. Literally.

They advertise EVERYWHERE.
And people in rooms get together and conspire how to get you to drink Coca-Cola.

They are called ad agents.

The meme of "conspiracy theorist" has me wanting to vomit.
I like the term "alternative truthers" better. (give it up to squirrelnutz)



posted on Dec, 19 2010 @ 02:22 PM
link   
reply to post by boondock-saint
 


Pro bono means he doesn't have to afford him. I would explain that question by saying that Soros is a big liberal and as such he would probably see Manning as an innocent in all of this, a guy who saw things he didn't like about a war that is illegal in the first place, and being the liberal that he is, wants to see the war stopped. So, Manning, being a whistleblower on an illegal war is seen by Soros as a scape goat of the administration - past and present.

With all that being said, I have my own reservations about Wikileaks, so I don't totally disagree with you. It's just that for as far as you and I see a NWO, you see it more as a progressive agenda, a global warming sham, well orchestrated by a liberal elite of "noblesse obligee" who know what's best for the simple-minded God-fearing, Constitution-loving folks of Middle America.

I see it more as a total trend, too big to be formally orchestrated, not really "conservative" and not really "liberal" - diet socialism - socialize the loss, privatize the profits, corporations en lieu of government - oligarchical control, all humans in the developed world completely branded and divorced from humanity, humans in the "developing world" completely enslaved to a system that is opaque from the view of the first world.

Whether it's your version or mine, it's hard to change the path we're on. I like to see it as changeable though...



posted on Dec, 19 2010 @ 06:25 PM
link   
reply to post by Josephus23
 


There's a difference between coming up with a conspiracy theory and provide some sort of evidence and making a random statement only backed up by an unfounded "Soros is evil and WL is therefore evil". Especially when the numbers (billions of dollars in charity) say differently. This whole "WL works for the NWO" statement is ridiculous, at least until someone can come up with credible proof that this really is the case...saying so just because you don't like Soros is ridiculous. Wanna know why Beck hates Soros so much? The real reason is because Soros is very powerful and supporting the people Beck hates! Given that Soros donated billions in dollars to charity promoting education and standing up against communism, I think this says a lot about people like Beck & Co.

I have nothing against people who try to uncover conspiracies, on the contrary...I wouldn't be on these boards if I did. Having said that, I will stand up against wacko ideas that give conspiracy people a bad name. The tinfoil hat pic I posted is a good example of a person who gives "us" a bad name, and threads like this one do as well.

I wonder how many people who now criticize WL will still do so once they release information that shows widespread corruption in the investment/banking sector. You know, the industry that #ed us all over...



posted on Dec, 20 2010 @ 05:11 PM
link   

Originally posted by MrXYZ
I wonder how many people who now criticize WL will still do so once they release information that shows widespread corruption in the investment/banking sector. You know, the industry that [snip] us all over...


I am still gonna criticize wikileaks and soros
cuz crashing the fed reserve system is the only
way to get the NWO implemented.

releasing the cables on the corrupt system
plays directly into the hand of the NWO
who wants out with the old, in with the new.

And look what soros' $7B did for Russia.
It turned it into one of the most corrupt
places on earth where the mafia rules.
soros really helped them out didn't he?
not to mention his own financial ties
to the mafia there. such an improvement
isn't it??

If left unchecked soros will do the same
thing here in America. What good will all
those charity billions of soros' dollars do
if freedom is lost in the process??

If soros succeeds in crashing America,
u can kiss the Constitution good bye.
That includes ur right to own or buy
a gun.



posted on Dec, 20 2010 @ 05:56 PM
link   
reply to post by boondock-saint
 



LOL... So now you're up to bat for the federal reserve?

I told you that you were a neocon, boon. Really, where does your advocacy differ from any of them?

They want Wikileaks prosecuted. So do you.

They want nobody to focus on the cables. So do you.

They want the federal reserve to stay in power. So do you.

They want corrupt banks and corporations to stay in power. So do you.

They want Wikileaks to shut up because its destabilizing the status quo. So do you.

Just admit it, Boon. We know what you really are.


P.S. And are you REALLY SAYING that the corrupt capitalistic Russia isn't an improvement on the insane dictatorship with no freedoms that was in place before? You realized that Stalin sent the entire population of Russia off to Siberian labor camps? You realize that listening to the Beetles might get you locked up for life, same with writing your own articles? Are you insane? Yes, Russia is screwed up, but a helluva lot better than before. Business practices may be CORRUPT now, but atleast they *have* businesses.
edit on 20-12-2010 by FalselyFlagged because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 20 2010 @ 06:10 PM
link   
reply to post by boondock-saint
 



I am still gonna criticize wikileaks and soros
cuz crashing the fed reserve system is the only
way to get the NWO implemented.

releasing the cables on the corrupt system
plays directly into the hand of the NWO
who wants out with the old, in with the new.


Oh my, now you wan't the Fed to stay?
Screwing the people plus their unborn granchildren ?

Ending the Fed does not neccessarily mean bring in a NWO..
It would depend how it was done and who did it..
I think the Fed will only end when the truth comes out and that would include a lot of scum, including Government, facing charges...



posted on Dec, 20 2010 @ 09:02 PM
link   

Originally posted by boondock-saint

Originally posted by MrXYZ
I wonder how many people who now criticize WL will still do so once they release information that shows widespread corruption in the investment/banking sector. You know, the industry that [snip] us all over...


I am still gonna criticize wikileaks and soros
cuz crashing the fed reserve system is the only
way to get the NWO implemented.


So it's Wikileaks and Soros' fault that the government spent decades borrowing money like a crack whore? Riiiiight...the systematic deregulation of the financial industry ever since Reagan didn't play a role either, right?


Originally posted by boondock-saint
releasing the cables on the corrupt system
plays directly into the hand of the NWO
who wants out with the old, in with the new.


So your plan is to stick to the old ("corrupt system"



posted on Dec, 21 2010 @ 08:52 AM
link   

Originally posted by FalselyFlagged
LOL... So now you're up to bat for the federal reserve?

since at least 2 people have made this
misconception, let me clarify.

NO, I AM NOT BATTING FOR THE FED !!!
I have stated numerous times in this thread
that I foresee the FED crashing and the NWO
taking advantage of that to implement the one
world order soros wants.

Yes, I would love to see the FED gone, but I
don't want soros and his goons to take advantage
of the ailing system which is exactly what they
intend to do. Crash it and then replace it with
their own soros/rothschild friendly system.

I will not trade one bad system for an even worse one.
That's not improvement or progress.



posted on Dec, 21 2010 @ 09:02 AM
link   
It seems Assange likes leaks and the truth
just as long as they do not target him.


He accused his media partners at The Guardian newspaper, which worked with him to make the embarrassing leaks public, of unfairly tarnishing him by revealing damaging details of the sex assault allegations he faces in Sweden.


www.foxnews.com...

Also, one other point in that article that I have
stated on this thread already.


Shares in Bank of America recently fell after speculation spread that it was the target.

“We don’t want the bank to suffer unless it’s called for,” Assange said. “But if its management is operating in a responsive way there will be resignations.”


This is the power play I was referring to
earlier in this thread. Make the bank weak
therefore it is a prime target for a
soros/rothschild/goldman sachs
takeover.

I wonder how many put options soros
had on the fall of BOA stock before
the wikileaks release of the bank cables?

This is how you can manipulate the stock
market and get rich through MSM.



posted on Dec, 21 2010 @ 09:20 AM
link   

Originally posted by MrXYZ
As for the rest, most of it went towards science and education in former Soviet countries and the US. Quite a substantial amount was used to overthrow communist ex-Soviet countries and lead them to democracy.

Democracy ???
lmao

I wouldn't call puppet regimes
of the CIA infested republics
a democracy.

Same thing happened in Iraq
and Afghan and even more South
American countries like Ecuador, Chile,
Paraguay, Brazil and Panama.
I wouldn't call that Democracy.
I call that a hostile takeover
of the world by stealth.
This is NOT democracy !!!
Forcing a puppet regime on
a populace is not democracy.
It's enslavement !!!
edit on 12/21/2010 by boondock-saint because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 21 2010 @ 12:33 PM
link   
well it's official.
thanks to wikileaks,
they passed the internet
control bill.

voices.washingtonpost.com...



posted on Dec, 21 2010 @ 12:49 PM
link   
reply to post by boondock-saint
 



The passing of it had NOTHING to do with WikiLeaks, but feel free to speculate.



posted on Dec, 21 2010 @ 12:53 PM
link   

Originally posted by boondock-saint
well it's official.
thanks to wikileaks,
they passed the internet
control bill.

voices.washingtonpost.com...



I love how you conveniently ignore the fact that you are in favor of CORRUPTION as long as your patriotic fantasy land remains unharmed in your head. You're not a patriot, you're one of the people who are bad for the US!!



new topics

top topics



 
203
<< 50  51  52    54  55  56 >>

log in

join