Help ATS with a contribution via PayPal:
learn more

Wikileaks Exposed - The man behind the NWO Curtain

page: 4
198
<< 1  2  3    5  6  7 >>

log in

join

posted on Dec, 2 2010 @ 02:01 AM
link   

Originally posted by backinblack
I don't give a damn about Soros..
I thought this thread was about Julian Assange..
Obviously I was wrong....

well u ought to give a damn about Soros.
It's his money calling the shots.

And I thought it was evident from the title

"The man behind the NWO curtain"

Assange is not behind a curtain,
Soros is




posted on Dec, 2 2010 @ 02:05 AM
link   
reply to post by boondock-saint
 
soros is my father's god.

my father and i have never agreed.



posted on Dec, 2 2010 @ 02:09 AM
link   
reply to post by boondock-saint
 


Hows does it take away the fact of the content of the leaked material? Assuming the content of the leaked information is true, the governments or entities involved still committed the acts. Right?

Regardless of agendas or who is funding it, it still took place.



posted on Dec, 2 2010 @ 02:11 AM
link   

Originally posted by boondock-saint

Originally posted by backinblack
I don't give a damn about Soros..
I thought this thread was about Julian Assange..
Obviously I was wrong....

well u ought to give a damn about Soros.
It's his money calling the shots.

And I thought it was evident from the title

"The man behind the NWO curtain"

Assange is not behind a curtain,
Soros is


So Julian and Wikileaks are bad based on association??
Hmmm OK, that would make a LOT of people bad...



posted on Dec, 2 2010 @ 02:22 AM
link   

Originally posted by remrem
Hows does it take away the fact of the content of the leaked material? Assuming the content of the leaked information is true, the governments or entities involved still committed the acts. Right?

Regardless of agendas or who is funding it, it still took place.

correct
the leaks released are IMO very real.
However, WHAT is revealed and WHEN
is the key to making this scheme work.

Like releasing info on a certain senator
right before election time can cost him
his job. Having that info and releasing
it on cue allows a person to play GOD
and sway the election.

Same goes for foreign policy or financial
policy.

Releasing incriminating data on Bank of America
does help it's competitors when it falls. It allows
the competitors to buy up stock shares and assets
for almost nothing.

It can also influence the stock markets around the world
in the same way.

It's someone being able to play GOD
is what it boils down to.

It's controlling the world directly from
your recliner. No standing army needed.



posted on Dec, 2 2010 @ 02:31 AM
link   

Originally posted by backinblack
So Julian and Wikileaks are bad based on association??

No, they are not bad based on association.
They are bad based on what their true agenda is.

These folks go to wikileaks and blow the whistle
and give them data and wikileaks manipulates
that data for an alternate agenda.



posted on Dec, 2 2010 @ 02:32 AM
link   

Originally posted by boondock-saint

Originally posted by remrem
Hows does it take away the fact of the content of the leaked material? Assuming the content of the leaked information is true, the governments or entities involved still committed the acts. Right?

Regardless of agendas or who is funding it, it still took place.

correct
the leaks released are IMO very real.
However, WHAT is revealed and WHEN
is the key to making this scheme work.

Like releasing info on a certain senator
right before election time can cost him
his job. Having that info and releasing
it on cue allows a person to play GOD
and sway the election.

Same goes for foreign policy or financial
policy.

Releasing incriminating data on Bank of America
does help it's competitors when it falls. It allows
the competitors to buy up stock shares and assets
for almost nothing.

It can also influence the stock markets around the world
in the same way.

It's someone being able to play GOD
is what it boils down to.

It's controlling the world directly from
your recliner. No standing army needed.


Yes I agree, indeed if thats the case. You may be right.
But I also think that a medium like wikileaks could keep "them" more honest, which would be a good thing.

I think the info is true and I think its in line with the "general quickening" we are experiencing. More and more information seems to be pumping out from all sorts of mediums.



posted on Dec, 2 2010 @ 02:46 AM
link   
reply to post by boondock-saint
 



These folks go to wikileaks and blow the whistle
and give them data and wikileaks manipulates
that data for an alternate agenda.


I just don't see what you base that on..The leaks so far have pretty much bagged everyone..
Unless you are just looking at what the MSM have released and didn't bothet to look at the other ATS thread I linked to.
So what's the agenda???????



posted on Dec, 2 2010 @ 02:54 AM
link   

Originally posted by backinblack
So what's the agenda???????

Soros playing God

I already stated that



posted on Dec, 2 2010 @ 03:06 AM
link   
reply to post by boondock-saint
 


So if Wiki is controled by Soros and Soros is a closet communist with Russian ties, why would he let this leak?


Senior US officials believed Russian prime minister Vladimir Putin could have known about the plan to murder dissident former spy Alexander Litvinenko in London, according to documents released by WikiLeaks.


news.ninemsn.com.au...

Must be one hell of a vague agenda...



posted on Dec, 2 2010 @ 03:14 AM
link   

Originally posted by backinblack
So what's the agenda???????

Let me try to explain this in another way.
From Julian's e-mail I posted in 2007.
They have so much leaked stuff that they had
to stop taking it all. They had 1T of data at that time.

And let's just say (example) a rebel soldier
in New Guinea post a video of a murder
of an entire family in a genocide killing
by government forces. Wouldn't that
be more important cuz people are dying
than say Bank of America's balance sheet
where nobody dies?

Which is more important? The video of the genocide
or BOA's Balance Sheet?

Well if Soros sits on the genocide video and
only posts the info on BOA, then he has an agenda
for releasing it in that order. He cares more about
buying the scraps of BOA than of people dying
in New Guinea.

That was just a hypothetical scenario.

But u get the gist of how the data can be
held until it's needed.

2 yrs later, Soros may want to put
an oil refinery in the middle of New Guinea
and the president says no. Then Soros
threatens him with the leaked video
of mass genocide and the president
caves in like a lil lamb. Soros gets
his refinery. If the president refuses
then we have a wikileaks release
showing a video of the genocide
and the New Guinea President is
hung in the town square.

It's WHAT is released and WHEN.

And what if Soros is holding onto the real
Kenyan birth certificate of Obama and blackmailing
him with it's release. You see how this leaked
data can be used for an agenda.

It's playing God.



posted on Dec, 2 2010 @ 03:16 AM
link   
reply to post by boondock-saint
 



Let me try to explain this in another way.
From Julian's e-mail I posted in 2007.


Hold up !!!
That supposed leaked email doesn't mention Julian anywhere..
It's not a screenshot or a scan of an email that's for sure..
Why would anyone believe it's real, honestly ????



posted on Dec, 2 2010 @ 03:18 AM
link   
reply to post by backinblack
 

lol
u r getting close
but not quite yet.

Money has no loyalty
to any flag or ideal.

Once u get so rich,
does it really matter what
flag u fly? When u can change
the laws to suit you, why
would u need a label on ur
forehead?



posted on Dec, 2 2010 @ 03:24 AM
link   

Originally posted by backinblack
Hold up !!!
That supposed leaked email doesn't mention Julian anywhere..
It's not a screenshot or a scan of an email that's for sure..
Why would anyone believe it's real, honestly ????

I tell u what black

u believe what u want.
nothing I say is gonna change ur mind
so I'm gonna stop trying.

believe what u want



posted on Dec, 2 2010 @ 03:29 AM
link   
Boon, you posted some interesting info that I bet alot of people dont truly know about. Definitely myself included.
So much so, Im going to have to sleep on it to take it all in.

Backinblack, you make an interesting case as well. You asked some good questions, that when I read them, I said out loud...thats a good question.

Thats what I love about ATS. People ask questions and dont back down until it is proven to that particular person.
Not sure that that has ever happened, but that is the goal.

Hopefully WL is the real thing and Assange doesnt have a personal agenda. Soros most certainly does.
Too bad, we might not find out until its too late.

Keep up the debate...its interesting.



posted on Dec, 2 2010 @ 03:31 AM
link   
reply to post by DIDtm
 


Why thank you kind sir but Boon just gave up on me..

Boon..



posted on Dec, 2 2010 @ 03:38 AM
link   

Originally posted by backinblack
Why thank you kind sir but Boon just gave up on me..

Boon..

I didn't give up on u.
I gave up on ur line
of reasoning.

when somebody already
has their mind made up,
No matter what u tell them
is wrong. And I feel like u
fit into this category so
I'm just not gonna waste my
time anymore.



posted on Dec, 2 2010 @ 03:42 AM
link   

Originally posted by boondock-saint

Originally posted by backinblack
Why thank you kind sir but Boon just gave up on me..

Boon..

I didn't give up on u.
I gave up on ur line
of reasoning.

when somebody already
has their mind made up,
No matter what u tell them
is wrong. And I feel like u
fit into this category so
I'm just not gonna waste my
time anymore.

Fair enough..Proving a theory is always much harder than making one up..
Scrutiny hurts...
BTW, you know your whole post also fits with you..



posted on Dec, 2 2010 @ 03:43 AM
link   

Originally posted by DIDtm
Boon, you posted some interesting info that I bet alot of people dont truly know about. Definitely myself included.
So much so, Im going to have to sleep on it to take it all in.

well thank you.
I can't take credit for all of it.
quite a few posted some good info
on here. they deserve credit too


boon



posted on Dec, 2 2010 @ 03:45 AM
link   

Originally posted by backinblack
Fair enough..Proving a theory is always much harder than making one up..
Scrutiny hurts...
BTW, you know your whole post also fits with you..

lmao

well one thing u can't say .....

that you have represented both sides
of this argument at one time or other
like I have





new topics

top topics



 
198
<< 1  2  3    5  6  7 >>

log in

join