It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by boondock-saint
Yes
I did change my mind after that conversation
with you in the other thread. A lot can happen
in one's opinions in a 24 hr period.
WHAT PART OF THIS IS HARD FOR U TO UNDERSTAND??
THOSE ARE YOUR WORDS............
READ THE FIRST 5 WORDS TO YOURSELF...
IT SAYS " I DID CHANGE MY MIND"
Originally posted by Bicent76
wiki leaks is just what it is, a publicity stunt, to do what? Well to take the uneducated for a ride. I suppose this thread holds some kinda truth but it is so distorted I am at the end of a charade when it comes to the revealing of the truth. It is what it is. Satire, with the de ja of that and this of what you want to believe.. We are yet civil nor intellectual as a species. We are conditioned and it continues, hook line and sinker you are my strange friend... I have my own guess, my guess is distortion.. In the Questions in itself. Welcome to the unknown.. I am exhausted..... I am going to have to except defeat tomorrow, oh ya, and this thread is good reminder of what for.. Talk about not being worth it... I expected more...
Originally posted by backinblack
reply to post by ParkerCramer
WHAT PART OF THIS IS HARD FOR U TO UNDERSTAND??
THOSE ARE YOUR WORDS............
READ THE FIRST 5 WORDS TO YOURSELF...
IT SAYS " I DID CHANGE MY MIND"
Jebus mate, he's allowed to change his mind..
Why is irrelevant to the thread..Discuss that instead of the poster..
Personally I think Boon was kidnapped and replaced with a reptilian,
but that just means I now have to debate with a lizard..
Originally posted by SeventhSeal
Wikileaks is not a CIA experiment or operative network. It is ran by Assange who was originally a hacker and started up a blog and eventually Wikileaks. In the beginning he had a small crew and some volunteers. He is our governments number one enemy.
Please, enough with this BS about him being a CIA operative. It's embarrassing to those who demand the truth on this site.
Originally posted by Southern Guardian
reply to post by boondock-saint
Can somebody please explain to me why George Soros is a bad man?
Soros may be the biggest political fat cat of all time. Convicted in France of insider trading, Soros specializes in weakening or collapsing the currencies of entire nations for his own selfish interests. He is known as the man who broke the Bank of England. His power is such that his statements alone can cause currencies to go up or down....
The media consistently ignore the fact that this so-called “philanthropist” has had several brushes with the law as he has laid siege to national economies and currencies. Hard-working U.S. businessmen understand how Soros has made his money. In protesting a Soros appearance hosted by the University of Toledo, Edwin J. Nagle III, president and CEO of the Nagle Companies, highlighted “the immoral and unethical means by which he achieved his wealth.” He added, “I certainly didn’t see included in his bio the stories on how he collapsed whole country’s currencies for his own self interests so that many may suffer.”
Here, Soros signed a consent decree in United States District Court, in a Securities and Exchange Commission case involving stock manipulation, and was fined $75,000 by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission for holding positions “in excess of speculative limits.” Stories about Soros rarely, if ever, mention any of his legal problems
....Soros has categorically denied receiving money from drug cartels or any form of criminal activity. The fact remains, however, that at least some of his financial operations have been based offshore, in banking and financial centers that are widely reported to be considered conducive to money-laundering. The Soros fund is based in the Netherlands Antilles, a self-governing federation of five Caribbean islands. A CIA factbook describes the region as “a transshipment point for South American drugs bound for the US and Europe; money-laundering center.”
“It is sort of a disease when you consider yourself some kind of god, the creator of everything, but I feel comfortable about it now since I began to live it out,” (The Independent, June 3, 1993)
“I admit that I have always harbored an exaggerated view of self-importance –to put it bluntly, I fancied myself as some kind of god or an economic reformer like Keynes or, even better, a scientist like Einstein,” (The Alchemy of Finance, George Soros)
According to friend Byron Wien (now with the Blackstone Group), “You must understand he thinks he’s been anointed by God to solve insoluble problems. The proof is that he has been so successful at making so much. He therefore thinks he has a responsibility to give money away,” (Time Magazine, Sept 1, 1997)
“If truth be known, I carried some rather potent messianic fantasies with me from childhood which I felt I had to control, otherwise I might end up in the loony bin. But when I made my way in the world I wanted to indulge myself in my fantasies to the extent that I could afford.”
George Soros 60 Minutes Interview – 12/20/98 / Transcript:
Originally posted by 27jd
Originally posted by fredcall
I never said Judy Assangry was a CIA operative. He was never qualified to be an operative. I said he was a CIA puppet. I also said he was a George Soros puppet. Interesting links between all of them, huh?
I gotta say, I've lurked around alot of these wikileaks threads, and you pop up in each one and purposely screw up Assange's name to make a mockery of it, but it's really not very funny and kind of annoying. We get it. You don't like the guy. But please stop pretending you don't know his name, since again, you post in almost ALL the threads. If you won't do that at least come up with a funny one.
Anyway, on topic. I have had a hard time with this wikileaks thing, mainly the fact that the mainstream media, that we all pretty much agree are mouthpieces for TPTB, have picked this up and run with it. CNN has had their own section dedicated to it for a while now. That doesn't jive with me. If this were really something that the government didn't want us to see, we wouldn't see it on the MSM the way we do now. It would be ignored, or at the most there would be a small piece on it, which did nothing but discredit it and attack the messenger....