It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Wikileaks Exposed - The man behind the NWO Curtain

page: 19
203
<< 16  17  18    20  21  22 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Dec, 2 2010 @ 09:46 PM
link   

Originally posted by SkurkNilsen
So you are saying Glen Beck is right in saying a 14 year old jewish boy was collaborating with the Nazis in stealing land?

Were the jews working in Auschwitz Nazi collaberators aswell?


Not jumping in to defend Beck, I can't stand him personally, he's part of the scam. But why couldn't a jewish boy collaborate with the nazis? There are always collaborators, and being jewish is just a religion like all the others. There's nothing about being jewish that makes them more loyal than other religions. I find it strange that the idea is so far fetched for you.




posted on Dec, 2 2010 @ 09:46 PM
link   
Are you picking Sorros because of Glen Beck's comments about him? Have you seen John Stewarts rebuttle?


reply to post by boondock-saint
 



posted on Dec, 2 2010 @ 09:47 PM
link   

Originally posted by boondock-saint



I am saying that Soros admitted on tape that
he collaborated willingly (not by force) to help
steal land from Jews and give it to the Germans.




'willingly'. LOL. Yeah, he could have done that or been killed.

That's totally free will.

edit on 2-12-2010 by incrediblelousminds because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 2 2010 @ 09:51 PM
link   
reply to post by boondock-saint
 


So I've read many pages and posts now speculating how bad George Soros is..
And some posters that say he is the good guy..

What I have seen little or nothing of is proof that Julian Assange and Wikileaks is working for Soros in any way, shape or form...

Is this thread ever going to actually prove a REAL connection other than the fact he may have received donations from Soros related company??
Ohh and that a laywer that sometimes works for one of the Soros companies occassionally on pro bono, is assisting Manning..

Is there any proof?????
edit on 2-12-2010 by backinblack because: (no reason given)


kix

posted on Dec, 2 2010 @ 09:53 PM
link   
If Soros will take down the US economy, with wiki and things like that is because the system is rotten to the core and that HE CAN. Sadly the USa is now what it was 40 years ago.
Now Soros is a very smart guy and knows how to make his dealings, do you honestly believe he would leave such a trail that even someone with a computer and internet would find out in 20 minutes the connections?

Remember magicians always make you see the hand that distracts you while the other makes things dissapear...

just sayin´



posted on Dec, 2 2010 @ 09:54 PM
link   
reply to post by boondock-saint
 


Man... This is an exercise in futility...

If you seriously think that a man that can say that a 14 years old boy collaborated with the nazis, when he in fact was working for them to save his life is a credible source then I guess this discussion is going nowhere.

I mean we shot collaberators after WWII in Europe, we didn't shoot people who were forced to work for the occupiers, I think there's a difference.



posted on Dec, 2 2010 @ 09:55 PM
link   

Originally posted by ParkerCramer
no, I believe you stated that he had changed your mind with that conversation..........
a total turn around of opinion...
it would stand to reason that it would be a memorable conversation if it was powerful enough to make you do a 180o
just tell me which thread yesterday, and I will do the search??
not too much to ask, is it??

no I didn't state that HE changed my mind.
Once again u r interjecting speculation.
He made the comment that this thread was a stark contrast
in my thinking since I had posted in that other thread 24 hrs prior
and I agreed with that statement. But I never said
HE nor his post changed my mind.
I changed my mind while doing internet research
on the topic of the connection between
wikileaks and Soros and his post had nothing to
do with that at all.

As far as the thread, it was a wikileaks thread
is all I remember.



posted on Dec, 2 2010 @ 09:56 PM
link   
boon,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,

I just went back through a conversation I had with jaynkeel yesterday, and at 1:23 p.m. CST he stated, and I quote " I'm still on the fence about wiki-leaks and who's behind them"


now, when did he cause you to change your mind??

before or after he changed his mind???

something stinks to high heaven here, so, I'll ask you one last time to please direct me to the thread that caused you to do a 180o on this wiki-leaks issue???



posted on Dec, 2 2010 @ 09:59 PM
link   

Originally posted by v1rtu0s0
Are you picking Sorros because of Glen Beck's comments about him? Have you seen John Stewarts rebuttle?


reply to post by boondock-saint
 




Sad commentary on the current state of the American people when either of those two entertainers (clowns) are considered to have any valid argument or point of view on anything.

That said, wikileaks exposed itself for what it was a very long time ago, and no one was paying attention.




posted on Dec, 2 2010 @ 10:00 PM
link   

Originally posted by 27jd
But why couldn't a jewish boy collaborate with the nazis? There are always collaborators, and being jewish is just a religion like all the others.

a very valid point
and so much so that a hollywood movie was made
about Jews collaborating with the Germans
entitled "Schindler's List". A great movie.



posted on Dec, 2 2010 @ 10:01 PM
link   
Why do people type things and only use like 4 words per line instead of using the full text box? I can't even get through the whole OP because its just too dang annoying to read like that. I see a few people do it and I just dont get it.

OP I'm glad you brought this up though, I have thought this and have been flamed many times for questioning the great julian.



posted on Dec, 2 2010 @ 10:01 PM
link   

Originally posted by boondock-saint

Originally posted by jaynkeel
So Boon did this come about after our discussion on that other thread the other day? In your search down the rabbit hole?
I gotta say think you nailed it again on this thread.

Yes
I did change my mind after that conversation
with you in the other thread. A lot can happen
in one's opinions in a 24 hr period.



are these your words???

2nd



posted on Dec, 2 2010 @ 10:08 PM
link   

Originally posted by boondock-saint

Originally posted by jaynkeel
So Boon did this come about after our discussion on that other thread the other day? In your search down the rabbit hole?
I gotta say think you nailed it again on this thread.

Yes
I did change my mind after that conversation
with you in the other thread. A lot can happen
in one's opinions in a 24 hr period.



are these your words???

did you just leave the site again??????????????????

thats 2 TIMES in the same day, as soon as the tough questions are asked you vanish???

no problem, I can wait for you to come back, but, rest assured boon, I will continue to seek an answer from you, after all this ENTIRE post is predicated on the fact that you changed your mind 180o in just 24 hours??

so, I don't think it's unreasonable for you to provide us with an ANSWER!!!!






2nd



edit on 2-12-2010 by ParkerCramer because: (no reason given)

edit on 2-12-2010 by ParkerCramer because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 2 2010 @ 10:09 PM
link   

Originally posted by incrediblelousminds
'willingly'. LOL. Yeah, he could have done that or been killed.

That's totally free will.

ya know, it's this type of nit picking
over the meaning of a word that just
makes me want to puke.

U sound just like my anal retentive
high school english teacher when I
forgot to dot my I's on my term paper.

We are straying off topic, what Soros did
at 14 has almost nothing to do with what he
is doing now. However you continue this
tripe in hopes of stalling this thread.

It has already been proven that Soros admitted
this fact that Beck claimed. So Beck was
NOT lying about it.



posted on Dec, 2 2010 @ 10:12 PM
link   
reply to post by Blaine91555
 


Blaine91555 Great posts, and information.

You brought up the Hillary factor in all of this Wikileaks scandal.

I have been musing on that...and wonder outloud. Did not Assange reveal something by calling for
her resignation?

What I noticed was she is the only person he has ever called on to resign in all of his years
as Wikileaks ring leader.

Does anyone else find this very telling?
edit on 2-12-2010 by burntheships because: classified



posted on Dec, 2 2010 @ 10:15 PM
link   

Originally posted by whoshotJR
Why do people type things and only use like 4 words per line instead of using the full text box? I can't even get through the whole OP because its just too dang annoying to read like that. I see a few people do it and I just dont get it.

well just click that lil red X
in the upper right hand corner
and that should fix it.



posted on Dec, 2 2010 @ 10:19 PM
link   

Originally posted by backinblack
reply to post by boondock-saint
 


So I've read many pages and posts now speculating how bad George Soros is..
And some posters that say he is the good guy..

What I have seen little or nothing of is proof that Julian Assange and Wikileaks is working for Soros in any way, shape or form...

Is this thread ever going to actually prove a REAL connection other than the fact he may have received donations from Soros related company??
Ohh and that a laywer that sometimes works for one of the Soros companies occassionally on pro bono, is assisting Manning..

Is there any proof?????
edit on 2-12-2010 by backinblack because: (no reason given)


I'll repost this as you obviously missed it



posted on Dec, 2 2010 @ 10:20 PM
link   

Originally posted by boondock-saint

Originally posted by incrediblelousminds
'willingly'. LOL. Yeah, he could have done that or been killed.

That's totally free will.

ya know, it's this type of nit picking
over the meaning of a word that just
makes me want to puke.

U sound just like my anal retentive
high school english teacher when I
forgot to dot my I's on my term paper.

We are straying off topic, what Soros did
at 14 has almost nothing to do with what he
is doing now. However you continue this
tripe in hopes of stalling this thread.

It has already been proven that Soros admitted
this fact that Beck claimed. So Beck was
NOT lying about it.


This has to do with the credibilltiy of yor sources and is relevant.

Do you seriously think that a man that can say that a 14 years old boy collaborated with the nazis, when he in fact was working for them to save his life is a credible source?

I mean we shot collaberators after WWII in Europe, we didn't shoot people who were forced to work for the occupiers, I think there's a difference.



posted on Dec, 2 2010 @ 10:21 PM
link   

Originally posted by ParkerCramer

Originally posted by boondock-saint

Originally posted by jaynkeel
So Boon did this come about after our discussion on that other thread the other day? In your search down the rabbit hole?
I gotta say think you nailed it again on this thread.

Yes
I did change my mind after that conversation
with you in the other thread. A lot can happen
in one's opinions in a 24 hr period.

are these your words???
2nd


what is ur problem ???
there is a lot of difference in saying
after. Never did I say that he changed
my mind. I refuse to answer any more
questions regarding this stupidity.

HE HAD NOTHING TO DO WITH ME
CHANGING MY MIND. IT HAPPENED
AFTER THE FACT.



posted on Dec, 2 2010 @ 10:29 PM
link   

Originally posted by felonius
Just throwing this on the wall to see if it sticks.

A friend of mine thinks that the missle off of the coast of Cali WAS ours...but "We" didnt push the button.

Hackers saying "look what we can do"?


There is a naval air station off the coast of California where Directed Energy tests have been being conducted for some time now. The Directed Energy resource program is located in Los Alamos...yes, where the atomic bomb was first created. Directed Energy translates into laser weapons that can track and knock out incoming ICBMs. The Directed Energy weapon is mounted on the nose of a 747. They fire a target missile without a warhead. The Directed Energy weapon is intended to knock the target missile out of the air. That's what people saw off the coast of California. In the future, basically we can push the button and vaporize a city through Directed Energy rather than using a nuke. Less radioactivity involved. And Directed Energy is just what it says it is....directed. In the future it can wipe out a Baghdad street loaded with terrorist snipers without wiping out all of Baghdad...or Theran. Whatever. Wherever the need arises to proetect America and American interests.



new topics

top topics



 
203
<< 16  17  18    20  21  22 >>

log in

join