It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
How does Soros get total control?
By making war between countries
to make them financially weak.
Soros Wikipage
Victor Niederhoffer said of Soros: "Most of all, George believed even then in a mixed economy, one with a strong central international government to correct for the excesses of self-interest."
Originally posted by GlennCanady
Your research looks pretty strong. Its obvious Wikileaks is pushing some Agenda. For example, why is Israel never hung out to dry? I don't recall seeing anything in these releases that shows Israel in a negative light at all. Somebody is filtering these releases. And if you notice, they ALWAYS are pushing to go attack Iran and how much a "BIG" threat they are to world peace when Iran hasn't attacked anybody since the 17th Century! LOL It's a sick nwo joke.
Soros is pure nwo evil but he's only a very high level puppet. He must be working for the Rothschilds or Rockefellers or somebody with REAL money who make Soros look like a relative Pauper. Last I looked they showed Soros has a net worth of $26 billion or so and the Rothschilds have an estimated worth of over $900 Trillion! Of course that is estimated because they have it spread around thousands of corporations. Billionaires aren't running ANYTHING!
Originally posted by incrediblelousminds
It would clean up this site a lot to not let people call blog posts from Glen Beck a 'source'.
Those aren't 'sources', they are pundits.
Originally posted by lbndhr
reply to post by fredcall
As I stated to in my original post( my views my thoughts i share as you do) perhaps this is wikis intent to start riots-revolutions to gain control over the populations, to begin the NWO to which anyone with common sense knows is factual and eventual.( NWO that is) but to actually do as I was accused and to think i would have many sideded to me oh no no for there are far tooo many chicken turds as shown already... They shall allow their freedoms and fears to flow threw there veins through their very last freeee days....peace to us all
Originally posted by jaynkeel
Originally posted by incrediblelousminds
It would clean up this site a lot to not let people call blog posts from Glen Beck a 'source'.
Those aren't 'sources', they are pundits.
I see your new here so welcome to ATS. And by the way you can start a new thread to discuss off topic stuff once you meet the post criteria. Most members appreciate people staying on topic and not trolling with comments that add nothing to the discussion at hand. But hey Welcome to ATS.
Just my opinion, nothing else
Originally posted by incrediblelousminds
Originally posted by jaynkeel
Originally posted by incrediblelousminds
It would clean up this site a lot to not let people call blog posts from Glen Beck a 'source'.
Those aren't 'sources', they are pundits.
I see your new here so welcome to ATS. And by the way you can start a new thread to discuss off topic stuff once you meet the post criteria. Most members appreciate people staying on topic and not trolling with comments that add nothing to the discussion at hand. But hey Welcome to ATS.
Just my opinion, nothing else
Actually, my comment was related directly to the OP, as the OP claims to have relevant information that he sources from a Glen Beck website.
Your post, on the other hand, relates in no way to the topic at all, but is instead engaging in some back-seat moderation that I suspect is discouraged by the TOS.
Originally posted by GlennCanady
Your research looks pretty strong. Its obvious Wikileaks is pushing some Agenda.
Originally posted by jaynkeel
Originally posted by incrediblelousminds
Originally posted by jaynkeel
Originally posted by incrediblelousminds
It would clean up this site a lot to not let people call blog posts from Glen Beck a 'source'.
Those aren't 'sources', they are pundits.
I see your new here so welcome to ATS. And by the way you can start a new thread to discuss off topic stuff once you meet the post criteria. Most members appreciate people staying on topic and not trolling with comments that add nothing to the discussion at hand. But hey Welcome to ATS.
Just my opinion, nothing else
Actually, my comment was related directly to the OP, as the OP claims to have relevant information that he sources from a Glen Beck website.
Your post, on the other hand, relates in no way to the topic at all, but is instead engaging in some back-seat moderation that I suspect is discouraged by the TOS.
I was simply trying to be polite without having to notify the mods of your post seeming to deliberately want to derail the thread into a discussion of why Glenn Beck should be removed from the site. And in the same breath I was trying to extend some courtesy your way and welcome you to ATS. Sorry no backseat modding here, I don't work for free...
Originally posted by jaynkeel
Well the op must be doing something right as this thread is at 100 flags now. So I guess all us people who agree and flagged are just mentally deficient? Attention staff there seems to be room for one more emoticon in the bottom right, consider this a request for one that has a middle finger. Thanks.
Originally posted by jaynkeel
Originally posted by incrediblelousminds
It would clean up this site a lot to not let people call blog posts from Glen Beck a 'source'.
Those aren't 'sources', they are pundits.
I see your new here so welcome to ATS. And by the way you can start a new thread to discuss off topic stuff once you meet the post criteria. Most members appreciate people staying on topic and not trolling with comments that add nothing to the discussion at hand. But hey Welcome to ATS.
Just my opinion, nothing else
Originally posted by jaynkeel
Well the op must be doing something right as this thread is at 100 flags now. So I guess all us people who agree and flagged are just mentally deficient? Attention staff there seems to be room for one more emoticon in the bottom right, consider this a request for one that has a middle finger. Thanks.
It would clean up this site a lot to not let people call blog posts from Glen Beck a 'source'.