Wikileaks Exposed - The man behind the NWO Curtain

reply to post by Quantum Logic


Very well said, Quantum Logic. At first, when I became aware of NWO, I was very paranoid and terrified. So scared that I would not want to go out or do anything because in my head I was always thinking, 'it must be a NWO plot out to get me'.
I am with you. They are not as powerful as they say they are. I do believe that they have purposely instilled fear to people with influence that have been allowed to write books on the subject.

Speaking of the Soros/Obama link to Brazilian oil.....look what is coming across the internet now!! And we thought Wikileaks would be the end all, be all..........

1,300 New pages of formerly secret UFO documents surface in Brazil

www.ufoupdateslist.com...

Originally posted by boondock-saint

Originally posted by the_denv
Personally, I am not going to say anything because Wikileaks and Julian Assange have made more impact than anyone else in the world regarding a civilian response to TPTB.

ummm, just a question or two here

TPTB ???
Or Governments and Political Figures???
Remember, TPTB are a small group
of individuals and thousands of people
will be incriminated supposedly. So is
wiki really targeting TPTB or the
competition of TPTB ???

thats a slippery slope you are now on...............

ru suggesting that we now believe that everyone who is being exposed by wiki-leaks is on our side???
that they are protecting us against TPTB????

now, you are either making one heck of a statement, or, and it's a big OR, you are one of the best dis-info agents I've ever had to work against?????????????

I will wait for your response.........................................................................................................?

reply to post by boondock-saint



wow.. Boon~~~~!! just wow..!!! I'm not sure if you did this because you needed flags & stars or just confused..I going to agree with the posters that say.."most of the time I would agree, but not this time"....so now you've flip'd..

we all wanted disclosure and even screamed for it, I know I have and now that we got it, it's Bah.. it's just NWO.!!

might want to look a bit deeper than the media is telling you/us.

I"m on board with the member that posted something to the fact that if I had money and knew someone had means and I knew there was major amount of Corruption going on, yea.. I'd probably do the same thing.. it's about caring for humanity itself, NOT manipulating it. ALL things that are hidden will be brought into the light.. ALL...

something I remember hearing from a president is.. "we need to keep our noses outta everyone's businesses"

we got enuf problems without creating more

come on back to the real side, as scary as it is, it's still the truth .. no matter how you slice it ..

So where is the evidence that Assange is funded by Soros? By the way, Wikileaks is open to ALL kinds of fund donors, and if Soros deems that it's a good thing to put his money into them, what's wrong with it? Or perhaps that only the GOP and FBI-supported acts liek Glenn Beck and Matt Drudge are the only ones who are being honest, since they are on your side of the political farce?

I don't wanna be too harsh... just guessin'.

First,�Beck points out�that the Wikileaks are supported by a number of shady individuals and organizations, including Code Pink, communist Noam Chomsky, Michael Moore, Daniel Ellsburg, and MDS — the adult counterpart of SDS.

<

Plain nonsense. All these people have as much to do together than George Dubya and Alex Jones have! And moreover none of these are "communists", and even less radical communists. Socialists most probably, still.

Instead of relying on brainless conspiracy theories like this, why don't you go read REAL communist theory, from authors like Rosa Luxemburg, Proudhon, Debord and Marx, instead putting your faith into straw men claims and misinterpretations build up by undereducated neocons. Perhaps you'd get a clearer view of what's happening with your world...or you can also keep your eyes shut and block your ears from these "Evil filthy commies goin' to take over your America since 1922".

I don't know about wikileaks having an agenda(they propably do), but after reading this

from wikipedia:

In an interview with The Washington Post on November 11, 2003, Soros said that removing President George W. Bush from office was the "central focus of my life" and "a matter of life and death." He said he would sacrifice his entire fortune to defeat President Bush, "if someone guaranteed it."

and

Asked in 2006 about his statement in The Age of Fallibility that "the main obstacle to a stable and just world order is the United States", Soros responded that "it happens to coincide with the prevailing opinion in the world. And I think that's rather shocking for Americans to hear. The United States sets the agenda for the world. And the rest of the world has to respond to that agenda. By declaring a 'war on terror' after September the 11th, we set the wrong agenda for the world. [...] when you wage war, you inevitably create innocent victims."

...maybe that agenda isn't all bad. I mean read the wiki about Soros... He might be my new hero.

Make the money and use it against the crazy elitists running stuff, he seems to be one of the few people in the world who is acctually fighting TPB on their own terms....

Originally posted by Echtelion

So where is the evidence that Assange is funded by Soros? By the way, Wikileaks is open to ALL kinds of fund donors, and if Soros deems that it's a good thing to put his money into them, what's wrong with it? Or perhaps that only the GOP and FBI-supported acts liek Glenn Beck and Matt Drudge are the only ones who are being honest, since they are on your side of the political farce?

I don't wanna be too harsh... just guessin'.

First,�Beck points out�that the Wikileaks are supported by a number of shady individuals and organizations, including Code Pink, communist Noam Chomsky, Michael Moore, Daniel Ellsburg, and MDS — the adult counterpart of SDS.

<

Plain nonsense. All these people have as much to do together than George Dubya and Alex Jones have! And moreover none of these are "communists", and even less radical communists. Socialists most probably, still.

Instead of relying on brainless conspiracy theories like this, why don't you go read REAL communist theory, from authors like Rosa Luxemburg, Proudhon, Debord and Marx, instead putting your faith into straw men claims and misinterpretations build up by undereducated neocons. Perhaps you'd get a clearer view of what's happening with your world...or you can also keep your eyes shut and block your ears from these "Evil filthy commies goin' to take over your America since 1922".

So they are not all connected? I think your the one who needs to open their eyes. Not everything in this world revolves around Beck.
BTW you can keep your communist hero's and study their madness all you want, most of us REAL Americans prefer to have nothing to do with that crap.

Originally posted by boondock-saint

Originally posted by wcitizen
What is it you guys really want? Not an end to the corrupt government, that's for sure.

i would rather not trade one tyrannical
regime for another. where is the progress?

Equivocation and doing nothing support this tyranny.

Originally posted by boondock-saint

Wikileaks Exposed - The man behind the NWO Curtain

....China hates North Korea, etc...

What? LOL

It was good reading until I got to that line...

Or are you being sarcastic? My apologies if you are then...

but LOL...

George soros, whoever it is, should be known...as the great puppeteer its more degarding towards those assocaited with him/them thier real useless use in this life puppets

reply to post by boondock-saint


No offence, but I read two paragraphs and new you didn't know what you are talking about. You have the right idea though. Follow the money. It surely will lead to the source of these wikileaks.

Soros' business ventures have nothing to do with blackmail. The man would be arrested and thrown in jail quicker than you can say hot potatoe. If a billionaire would resort to using some website to "blackmail governments" for "power" the "NWO" is utterly stupid. And if that were the case obviously it didn't work, because they were released! I have not read through them, nor will I. If there is anything pertinent in them I imagine it will come out. But as of now nothing ground breaking has hit the headlines. I almost feel sorry for the diplomats who had to come up with the reports.

NWO is a moniker in the first place. Its a veil people use who have no understanding of history. They take misguided information mostly derived from partisan politics and use the NWO moniker for the people they wish to demonize. Please get away from using it. It is ridiculous.

reply to post by ParkerCramer


I rarely listen them, so your assumption about me is wrong and written out of immaturity. Study history and you will see that what I say is true. By assuming I am a fan of Rush or Glenn Beck, you show you have an agenda.

Originally posted by open_eyeballs
reply to post by boondock-saint

 

No offence, but I read two paragraphs and new you didn't know what you are talking about. You have the right idea though. Follow the money. It surely will lead to the source of these wikileaks.

Soros' business ventures have nothing to do with blackmail. The man would be arrested and thrown in jail quicker than you can say hot potatoe. If a billionaire would resort to using some website to "blackmail governments" for "power" the "NWO" is utterly stupid. And if that were the case obviously it didn't work, because they were released! I have not read through them, nor will I. If there is anything pertinent in them I imagine it will come out. But as of now nothing ground breaking has hit the headlines. I almost feel sorry for the diplomats who had to come up with the reports.

NWO is a moniker in the first place. Its a veil people use who have no understanding of history. They take misguided information mostly derived from partisan politics and use the NWO moniker for the people they wish to demonize. Please get away from using it. It is ridiculous.

Um ok like someone is going to arrest one of the richest men in the world? Heck celebrities get out of murder so I wouldn't put much stock in that theory.. And if it fits in his agenda of destabilizing the United States then I would expect him to utilize it as I know I would in his shoes.

I don't know why some are thinking everything has been released. From the Wikileaks website it says, " The embassy cables will be released in stages over the next few months. The subject matter of these cables is of such importance, and the geographical spread so broad, that to do otherwise would not do this material justice."

In stages over the next few months. There's plenty to read already and don't tell me any of you have read all of it.

reply to post by TruthSeeker8300
I suspect that they dont want to play all the cards at once ...Better to have a black up hand to play upon the public mind ....caution avoid all poles ....peace

Here's why I don't think Wikilinks is some kind of disinformation front. If you just go to the site and look at the load of information available it would take a building the size of the NSA or CIA filled with analysts to keep all their boats in line if you set this up for one man like Soros. The complicated intertwining of facts and information is just too complicated and mind boggling.

And why anyone here at Above Top Secret would think Wikileaks is some sort of con job is beyond me. It also stinks of disinformation agents in our own midst here at ATS slandering Wikileaks. And a Wikileaks organization is exactly what conspiracy theorists like ourselves live for is more information not less. That's what Wikileaks is doing. Supplying information from a variety of sources and letting the chips fall where they may. True transparency. It would take way too much time and trouble to redact the names and top secret material that they're trying to do AND also slant the information to be helpful to Soros. Also I think one guy made a point on here about all the information damaging to Israel does not look to me like some kind of front for Zionism or Soros if he's some kind of agent.

Plus if you have the whole world against you and almost all the media outlets you know you're probably doing the right thing. It's so obvious he's standing up to power with the clear light of truth. It reminds me of the quote by Jonathan Swift.

"When a true genius appears, you can know him by this sign: that all the dunces are in a confederacy against him"

The one creepy thing I noticed about the cables was there was a curious lack of stuff for the time period around 2001. Which would be when 9-11 happened. I would love to hear some of those cables during that time.

reply to post by boondock-saint


All i gotta say is GLENN BECK SO CALLED IT!!

So let's take a look here. Let's take a look at Bradley Manning supporters. This is the guy who actually got the documents to WikiLeaks. Code Pink. Code Pink, Code Pink. Wait a minute. Code Pink is related to Bill Ayers and Bernardine Dohrn and the whole anti Israel thing. Remember the flotilla? I believe Code Pink, doesn't Code Pink, can you look in? I think Code Pink gets money from Soros. Noam Chomsky, love Noam. You like Noam? Then you have the Movement for Democratic Society. Now, what is the Movement for Democratic Society? It is. It's the adult counterpart of the Students for a Democratic Society. So it's like the Grey Panthers and the Black Panthers. The Grey Panthers are the old ones? Now, who's the guy who started SDS back in the 1960s? He's the guy who's now running the Open Society Institute for George Soros. Oh. So that's

That's good. WikiLeaks founders when they started to talk about the need to raise $5 million, they said the only ones that had this kind of money that could do what they were looking to do was the CIA or George Soros. And they complained that the original the initial round of publicity had, quote, affected our delicate negotiations with the Open Society Institute. Now, I'm sure George Soros, because he's come out and he has said he is so against this WikiLeaks thing, he is so against it. Uh huh. WikiLeaks' advisory board member was a director of the China office of Human Rights Watch, which is Soros funded. Which the WikiLeaks editor, you know, he's hiding out in Great Britain, he's represented by attorney Mark Stevens, which is weird because Stevens also does pro bono work for the Open Society Institute. Isn't that weird?

Originally posted by backinblack

Originally posted by boondock-saint

Originally posted by backinblack
I never understand why anyone thinks people like Soros would be stupid enough to leave a trail as you have listed.
Not very smart, and you link a blog??

2 things

there is always a trail

the new american is not a blog

No, it's a rant mainly from Glen Beck..
Must be credible cause Beck never lies..

edit: It was the blog that said Julian was paid by Soros, so can you atleast confirm that with a better source??

edit on 1-12-2010 by backinblack because: (no reason given)

Does he? Prove it.

reply to post by boondock-saint

Wow, this is a find of sorts. Good job on the research on the reason for the leak information being released.

I would say honestly that George Soros is more fed-up with how things are going as most all of us are, and would like to see the end result sooner then later.

I just hope the leaks that come out soon are about the Banks policy's, wall street conduct, and the Fed, as well as the Polish plane that went down with all the heads of state.

Keep up the good work....

To start, I would love for Wikileaks to be on our side, but they're doing a poor job of it. Usually when people refer to good things like Alex Jones, David Icke, or Ron Paul as being controlled opposition or Pysops, I usually just ignore it, but Wikileaks is certainly different. If I were Julian Assange, I would take the ridiculous amount of information I have and I would release every last bit of it at once, to any media that wants it, not holster it and give it out occasionally, usually with quite a bit of dissapointment. If this guy were really on our side, he wouldn't have an insurance file, he would have already released that information, he would have released everything that he got. But so far he's only released unimportant stuff and has often released material that continues to support the lies that got us into war and nothing explosive has come out. The best leak we've had recently was ClimateGate and that was probably leaked by one of the NWO factions. You'd think these "hackers" would have been able to get stuff on GW easily, but instead they let people come to them with their inside info, it certainly seems to be fishing. If you were an insider and gave Wikileaks info, they wouldn't release it for a year probably, they'd also edit it up too. So it's pointless to give them info, the guy who did is being charged for it. We don't even need insider leaded info, there is enough information that is public domain that should shut all these monsters down, but instead we're supposed to hope for some new devastating info, even though there is already plenty that is explosive. Wikileaks could tell everyone the truth about what's going on in the world, that'd be far more productive than how they're trying to save the world. These people just do not act like they are on our side, they are acting exactly like the definition of controlled opposition and they haven't even done a good job of that. If Wikileaks isn't NWO related, then it might as well be, they're doing a horrible job either way.

The people at ATS need to realize that there are many different factions, there are many in the US, that's why this stuff gets so confusing, someone even said that Soros is the only real person fighting TPTB because he was against Bush. You have to realize that there are factions within the US that hate each other more than they hate us, it's all a big power struggle, one that began with the Rockefeller faction gaining more power and wealth than expected and then turned against the Rotschild faction, now we get Zionists, Bolsheviks, Nazis and all manner of bad people who have joined with these people and have created their own factions and problems within the factions. That's why Soros can be fighting against a monster like W, but still be a bad guy. It's like the Guy Fawkes misconception, he was trying to blow up Parliament to get even worse people in charge, that's stort of what Soros does.

I do agree though, much of this info doesn't want to be known by any of the factions, that is what really throws this all for a twist, that's the real puzzler. But remember, destabilization is destabilization and sometimes these people have to hurt themselves to help themselves. Look at the Federal Reserve doing it's best to destroy itself and America, they have to hurt themselves to hurt us, then they can swoop in and save us, the whole concept of the NWO.