There's an article on Rense which mentions similar issues - that of what the MSM is not telling people. Actually, I take this as a good sign in one
respect - it shows that the information which has been leaked is information which they don't want the masses to know about....which means they are
taking a significant hit with these releases. They've been exposed and they're screaming and kicking and shouting 'foul' - because uncomfortable
truths are being exposed.
Who Precisely is Attacking the World?
The stuck pigs are squealing. To shift the onus from the US State Department, Hillary Clinton paints Wikileaks' release of the "diplomatic cables" as
an "attack on the international community." To reveal truth is equivalent in the eyes of the US government to an attack on the world.
It is Wikileaks' fault that all those US diplomats wrote a quarter of a million undiplomatic messages about America's allies, a.k.a., puppet states.
It is also Wikileaks' fault that a member of the US government could no longer stomach the cynical ways in which the US government manipulates foreign
governments to serve, not their own people, but American interests, and delivered the incriminating evidence to Wikileaks.
The US government actually thinks that it was Wikileaks patriotic duty to return the evidence and to identify the leaker. After all, we mustn't let
the rest of the world find out what we are up to. They might stop believing our lies.
The influential German magazine, Der Spiegel, writes: "It is nothing short of a political meltdown for US foreign policy."
This might be more a hope than a reality. The "Soviet threat" during the second half of the 20th century enabled US governments to create institutions
that subordinated the interests of other countries to those of the US government. After decades of following US leadership, European "leaders" know no
other way to act. Finding out that the boss badmouths and deceives them is unlikely to light a spirit of independence. At least not until America's
economic collapse becomes more noticeable.
The question is: how much will the press tell us about the documents? Spiegel itself has said that the magazine is permitting the US government to
censure, at least in part, what it prints about the leaked material. Most likely, this means the public will not learn the content of the 4,330
documents that "are so explosive that they are labelled 'NOFORN,'" meaning that foreigners, including presidents, prime ministers, and security
services that share information with the CIA, are not permitted to read the documents. Possibly, also, the content of the 16,652 cables classified as
"secret" will not be revealed to the public.
full article on above link.
edit on 2-12-2010 by wcitizen because: (no reason given)