Assange rape charge 'could be a set up': Wilkie

reply to post by OddTimeSignature


Cool - A question then since you are from Sweden. Where is it stated Assange would be arrested, placed in solitary and be denied access to a lawyer?

And Assange, like the 2 females are innocent until proven guilty. Although the argument people make support my accusations that when info comes out from wiki its assamued to be accurate. When info comes out that calls wikileaks actions into question, those sources are attacked and labeled propoganda, lies etc.

People are so quick to dismiss any information that sheds light on wiki or assange.

People demand accountibility and for the US to face the accusations being leveled. When Assange breaks this same standard, its ignored.

This has nothing to do with Assange, and more to do with people who think the are entitled to classified information for no other reason than "just because" The only reason people support Assange is not because of his stated goal to end 2 wars, but because he is releasing illegally obtained classified information and placing it out there for everyone to read.

If Assange is charged and convicted, someone else will continue, at which point the god envy will shift from Assange to the new person.

reply to post by Xcathdra


The Swedes have a wretched abusive justice system, for all their claim to be the most civilized country on earth. They are basically NWO central. They support every statist, socialist globalist agenda by force if necessary.

Look what they did to this poor couple. They essentially took their children away because they wanted to homeschool them in another country!

www.wnd.com...

Germany is even worse. I think the EU is a human rights disaster waiting to happen. That's what happens when you want to create a social paradise by the hand of man. Just ask Hitler or Stalin how that turned out.

If I were Assange I would stay away as well. If you want to follow the libertine mores of any of these satanic NWO countries they will own you. Assange should have kept his pants on. Like Jesus said, "He who sins is a slave of sin."

reply to post by Xcathdra

And Assange, like the 2 females are innocent until proven guilty. Although the argument people make support my accusations that when info comes out from wiki its assamued to be accurate. When info comes out that calls wikileaks actions into question, those sources are attacked and labeled propoganda, lies etc.

Mate, you are all over the place..

Wiki's cables are shown to be credible simply by the US Government questioning the leak, not the content..
Or have you heard a US official say they are false????

No one has shown any credible proof against Wikileaks being anything but what they say they are,
and that is a place for whistleblowers to get their information out..

Wikileaks/Julian did NOT steal these documents so can not be charged with that crime..

Julian is wanted for "qustioning" and has therefore not been charged..
So I ask, instead of getting Interpol involved, why didn't they just send someone over to England to question him?
Hell, there's even things called telephones..They know where he is..He isn't hiding...

Originally posted by PsykoOps
Apparently the maximum sentence for his alleged crime is:

5,000 Swedish kronor ($715).

Source gizmodo

So when reading through that the charge is actually 'sex by surprise' and not rape. No wonder it's not a manhunt in the meaning that they'd go and arrest him wherever he is. That interpol red flag thing seems appropriate for such a small crime.

I'm sorry for resorting to something as low as quoting myself but that thread doesn't seem active

Earlier this evening while switching between CNN and Fox to verify that no news is in fact being covered by either station (just the latest entertainment news sleight of hand), I happened to hear the teaser intro to Geraldo running down the stories to be highlighted in this evenings' show. The Julian Assange "rape'/Wikileaks story was to be covered, and Geraldo's lead in was something like "blah blah blah... "WIKIRAPIST Julian Assange" blah blah blah..."

So it's come down to 1984 style public disinfo, character assasination and the like as the standard operating procedure for the MSM. I know, I know, it's been like this for as long as I can remember as well. What really disturbs me is this:

No-one out there watching this 3 ring circus of an attempt to bring down Mr. Assange will ever stop to think about what they're being fed. So blatantly and obviously even a child! a CHILD!!! could see through it. WTH??????

reply to post by SunLord


I'm sure in a twisted, paranoid way that post is slightly on topic..
Though I could be wrong..

Originally posted by backinblack
reply to post by SunLord

 

I'm sure in a twisted, paranoid way that post is slightly on topic..
Though I could be wrong..

I agree here. But now its gone....

WHY?

MM

Originally posted by MissMegs

Originally posted by backinblack
reply to post by SunLord

 

I'm sure in a twisted, paranoid way that post is slightly on topic..
Though I could be wrong..

I agree here. But now its gone....

WHY?

MM

Edit: Member banned..Good Mod work

Originally posted by backinblack

Originally posted by MissMegs

Originally posted by backinblack
reply to post by SunLord

 

I'm sure in a twisted, paranoid way that post is slightly on topic..
Though I could be wrong..

I agree here. But now its gone....

WHY?

MM

Hmm edited by a Mod but no warning or off topic post sign??
Now that is plain wierd..

Thats with the WHY?

Crap, I LIKED your opinion, I guess there was someone that wasn't.

Can you please send your previous post to Julian Assange, just so it gets out there.

MM