The problem that I have, is that what people often say and what actually goes on are two completely different things, especially with figures
embroiled in our current socio-political climate. The way that Assange blazed into the living rooms of the western world, embraced and defined by our
media, it's almost as if they were building an image or persona that is much needed by all those screaming foul. Then, the smoke and mirrors from
various government entities, entities that I might add are already thought or known to be corrupt.
Dissent from the status quo was at a maximum, and then all of the sudden here comes this fugure, defined by the media as a modern day super-hero to
save the day, almost as if to play on that dissent and squelch it. Then, what this super hero exposes, is what these corrupt government figures and
world leaders have been telling us all along, making them not seem corrupt in the first place. Just the outcome that one could expect from a
Then, upon further inspection, we realize the house of cards that such a system is built on, the system of a dump site for anonymous whistleblowers to
dump their documents, exposing all. What this basically amounts to, is either of three possibilities. One, the government isn't all corrupt and if
they are, they would never even think about spreading disinfo. They must have magically changed over-night. Two, WL is a disinformation campaign, set
up from the start with that goal. Or three, WL is genuine, but being used as a disinformation outlet, unbeknownst to Assange.
If the government is all corrupt, then I just don't see how or why they wouldn't jump at this oppurtunity to exploit WL for the purpose of propagating
disinfo, and WL would really never know it. If WL wasn't a disinformation campaign from the start, then we also have many anomalies that are seemingly
failing to make since. For instance, why is the media defining him in such a manner, why not question his authenticity? Why not ignore him, as they do
every other whistle blower that challenges the status quo? Why would the government allow them to spread this info, when Sibel Edmonds for instance
was quietly and effectively stopped from telling what informaiton she had? Why did the Pentagon pretend to be "hunting" for Assange when his schedule
was public and he was touring the MSM studios and conventions here in the States? Why would the media being playing to his persona as a mysterious
shadowy figury, when he isn't really? Those are only but a few of the many important questions one needs to ask. Also, why would WL blow their own
scope of effectiveness way out of proportion, when they would know that their effectiveness would only go so far and the majority of info is locked up
too tight to be exposed through a dump site. surely Assange knows that by blowing his own scope of effectiveness out of proportion, then that actually
hurts his stated end goal, the one this very thread is about and make it even harder for that goal to be realized?
I have to tell you, the more I look into the subject matter, I become more and more convinced that this is all smoke and mirrors. Sadly, it is dealing
a huge blow to truth seekers world-wide and this is ultimately setting us back beyond square one. The world won't recover this attack on freedom for
generatyions to come, if ever.
edit on 1-12-2010 by airspoon because: (no reason given)