Important Topic Updates
, the site had over 1,200 registered volunteers
and listed an advisory board comprising Assange, Phillip Adams, Wang Dan, C. J. Hinke, Ben Laurie, Tashi Namgyal Khamsitsang, Xiao Qiang, Chico
Whitaker and Wang Youcai. Despite appearing on the list, when contacted by Mother Jones magazine in 2010, Khamsitsang said that while he received
an e-mail from WikiLeaks, he had never agreed to be an advisor.
WikiLeaks states that its "primary interest is in exposing oppressive regimes in Asia, the former Soviet bloc, Sub-Saharan Africa and the Middle
East, but we also expect to be of assistance to people of all regions who wish to reveal unethical behavior in their governments and
In January 2007, the website stated that it had over 1.2 million leaked documents that it was preparing to publish. An article in The New Yorker
One of the WikiLeaks activists owned a server that was being used as a node for the Tor network. Millions of secret transmissions passed through
it. The activist noticed that hackers from China were using the network to gather foreign governments’ information, and began to record this
traffic. Only a small fraction has ever been posted on WikiLeaks, but the initial tranche served as the site’s foundation, and Assange was able to
say, "[w]e have received over one million documents from thirteen countries."
Assange responded to the suggestion that eavesdropping on Chinese hackers played a crucial part in the early days of WikiLeaks by saying "the
imputation is incorrect. The facts concern a 2006 investigation into Chinese espionage one of our contacts were involved in. Somewhere between none
and handful of those documents were ever released on WikiLeaks. Non-government targets of the Chinese espionage, such as Tibetan associations were
informed (by us)". The group has subsequently released a number of other significant documents which have become front-page news items, ranging
from documentation of equipment expenditures and holdings in the Afghanistan war to corruption in Kenya.
The organization's stated goal is to ensure that whistle-blowers and journalists are not jailed for emailing sensitive or classified documents, as
happened to Chinese journalist Shi Tao, who was sentenced to 10 years in 2005 after publicising an email from Chinese officials about the anniversary
of the Tiananmen Square massacre.
The project has drawn comparisons to Daniel Ellsberg's leaking of the Pentagon Papers in 1971. In the United States, the leaking of some
documents may be legally protected. The U.S. Supreme Court has ruled that the Constitution guarantees anonymity, at least in the area of political
discourse. Author and journalist Whitley Strieber has spoken about the benefits of the WikiLeaks project, noting that "Leaking a government
document can mean jail, but jail sentences for this can be fairly short. However, there are many places where it means long incarceration or even
death, such as China and parts of Africa and the Middle East."
On 24 December 2009, WikiLeaks announced that it was experiencing a shortage of funds and suspended all access to its website except for a form to
submit new material. Material that was previously published was no longer available, although some could still be accessed on unofficial
mirrors. WikiLeaks stated on its website that it would resume full operation once the operational costs were covered. WikiLeaks saw
this as a kind of strike "to ensure that everyone who is involved stops normal work and actually spends time raising revenue". While it was
initially hoped that funds could be secured by 6 January 2010, it was only on 3 February 2010 that WikiLeaks announced that its minimum
fundraising goal had been achieved.
On 22 January 2010, PayPal suspended WikiLeaks' donation account and froze its assets. WikiLeaks said that this had happened before, and was done for
"no obvious reason". The account was restored on 25 January 2010.
On 18 May 2010, WikiLeaks announced that its website and archive were back up.
As of June 2010, WikiLeaks was a finalist for a grant of more than half a million dollars from the John S. and James L. Knight Foundation, but did
not make the cut. WikiLeaks commented, "Wikileaks was highest rated project in the Knight challenge, strongly recommended to the board but gets
no funding. Go figure”. WikiLeaks said that the Knight foundation announced the award to "'12 Grantees who will impact future of news' – but
not WikiLeaks" and questioned whether Knight foundation was "really looking for impact". A spokesman of the Knight Foundation disputed parts of
WikiLeaks' statement, saying "WikiLeaks was not recommended by Knight staff to the board." However, he declined to say whether WikiLeaks was
the project rated highest by the Knight advisory panel, which consists of non-staffers, among them journalist Jennifer 8. Lee, who has done PR work
for WikiLeaks with the press and on social networking sites.
On 17 July Jacob Appelbaum spoke on behalf of WikiLeaks at the 2010 Hackers on Planet Earth conference in New York City, replacing Assange because of
the presence of federal agents at the conference. He announced that the WikiLeaks submission system was again up and running, after it had
been temporarily suspended. Assange was a surprise speaker at a TED conference on 19 July 2010 in Oxford, and confirmed that WikiLeaks was now
accepting submissions again.
Upon returning to the U.S. from the Netherlands, on 29 July, Appelbaum was detained for three hours at the airport by U.S. agents, according to
anonymous sources. The sources told Cnet that Appelbaum's bag was searched, receipts from his bag were photocopied, his laptop was inspected,
although in what manner was unclear. Appelbaum reportedly refused to answer questions without a lawyer present, and was not allowed to make a
phone call. His three mobile phones were reportedly taken and not returned. On 31 July, he spoke at a Defcon conference and mentioned his phone
being "seized". After speaking, he was approached by two FBI agents and questioned.
wl admin intro
According to a January 2010 interview, the WikiLeaks team then consisted of five people working full-time and about 800 people who worked
occasionally, none of whom were compensated. WikiLeaks has no official headquarters. The expenses per year are about €200,000, mainly for
servers and bureaucracy, but would reach €600,000 if work currently done by volunteers were paid for. WikiLeaks does not pay for lawyers, as
hundreds of thousands of dollars in legal support have been donated by media organisations such as the Associated Press, The Los Angeles Times, and
the National Newspaper Publishers Association. Its only revenue stream is donations, but WikiLeaks is planning to add an auction model to sell
early access to documents. According to the Wau Holland Foundation, WikiLeaks receives no money for personnel costs, only for hardware, travelling
and bandwidth. An article in TechEYE.net wrote
As a charity accountable under German law, donations for Wikileaks can be made to the foundation. Funds are held in escrow and are given to
Wikileaks after the whistleblower website files an application containing a statement with proof of payment. The foundation does not pay any sort of
salary nor give any renumeration [sic] to Wikileaks' personnel, corroborating the statement of the site's German representative Daniel Schmitt (real
name Daniel Domscheit-Berg) on national television that all personnel works voluntarily, even its speakers.
wl- site management issues
There has been public disagreement between Julian Assange and Daniel Domscheit-Berg, who was suspended by Assange and on 28 September announced he
would leave the company. In October 2010, it was reported that Moneybookers, which collected donations for WikiLeaks, had ended its
relationship with the site. Moneybookers stated that its decision had been made "to comply with money laundering or other investigations conducted by
government authorities, agencies or commissions."
WikiLeaks describes itself as “an uncensorable system for untraceable mass document leaking”. WikiLeaks is hosted by PRQ, a Sweden-based company
providing “highly secure, no-questions-asked hosting services.” PRQ is said to have “almost no information about its clientele and maintains few
if any of its own logs.” The servers are spread around the world with the central server located in Sweden. Julian Assange has said that the
servers are located in Sweden (and the other countries) "specifically because those nations offer legal protection to the disclosures made on the
site". He talks about the Swedish constitution, which gives the information providers total legal protection. It is forbidden according to
Swedish law for any administrative authority to make inquiries about the sources of any type of newspaper. These laws, and the hosting by PRQ,
make it difficult to take WikiLeaks offline. Furthermore, "Wikileaks maintains its own servers at undisclosed locations, keeps no logs and uses
military-grade encryption to protect sources and other confidential information." Such arrangements have been called "bulletproof
On 17 August 2010, it was announced that the Swedish Pirate Party will be hosting and managing many of WikiLeaks' new servers. The party donates
servers and bandwidth to WikiLeaks without charge. Technicians of the party will make sure that the servers are maintained and working. Some
servers are hosted in the converted former NATO nuclear bunker CyberBunker
WikiLeaks is based on several software packages, including MediaWiki, Freenet, Tor, and PGP. WikiLeaks strongly encouraged postings via Tor
because of the strong privacy needs of its users.
wl policies intro
The "about" page originally read: "To the user, Wikileaks will look very much like Wikipedia. Anybody can post to it, anybody can edit it. No
technical knowledge is required. Leakers can post documents anonymously and untraceably. Users can publicly discuss documents and analyze their
credibility and veracity. Users can discuss interpretations and context and collaboratively formulate collective publications. Users can read and
write explanatory articles on leaks along with background material and context. The political relevance of documents and their verisimilitude will be
revealed by a cast of thousands."
However, WikiLeaks established an editorial policy that accepted only documents that were "of political, diplomatic, historical or ethical interest"
(and excluded "material that is already publicly available"). This coincided with early criticism that having no editorial policy would drive
out good material with spam and promote "automated or indiscriminate publication of confidential records." It is no longer possible for anybody
to post to it or edit it, as the original FAQ promised. Instead, submissions are regulated by an internal review process and some are published, while
documents not fitting the editorial criteria are rejected by anonymous WikiLeaks reviewers. By 2008, the revised FAQ stated that "Anybody can post
comments to it. [...] Users can publicly discuss documents and analyze their credibility and veracity." After the 2010 relaunch, posting new
comments to leaks was no longer possible.
wl verification of submissions
WikiLeaks states that it has never released a misattributed document. Documents are assessed before release. In response to concerns about the
possibility of misleading or fraudulent leaks, WikiLeaks has stated that misleading leaks "are already well-placed in the mainstream media.
[Wikileaks] is of no additional assistance." The FAQ states that: "The simplest and most effective countermeasure is a worldwide community of
informed users and editors who can scrutinize and discuss leaked documents."
According to statements by Assange in 2010, submitted documents are vetted by a group of five reviewers, with expertise in different fields such as
language or programming, who also investigate the background of the leaker if his or her identity is known. In that group, Assange has the final
decision about the assessment of a document.
wl- Police raid on German WikiLeaks domain holder's home
The home of Theodor Reppe, registrant of the German WikiLeaks domain name, wikileaks.de, was raided on 24 March 2009 after WikiLeaks released the
Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA) censorship blacklist. The site was not affected.
The Chinese (PRC) government uses its Golden Shield Project to attempt to censor every web site with "wikileaks" in the URL, including the primary
.org site and the regional variations .cn and .uk. However, the site is still accessible from behind the Chinese firewall through one of the many
alternative names used by the project, such as "secure.sunshinepress.org". The alternate sites change frequently, and WikiLeaks encourages users to
search "wikileaks cover names" outside mainland China for the latest alternative names. Mainland search engines, including Baidu and Yahoo!, also
censor references to "wikileaks".
wl-future censorship austrailia
On 16 March 2009, the Australian Communications and Media Authority added WikiLeaks to their proposed blacklist of sites that will be blocked for all
Australians if the mandatory internet filtering censorship scheme is implemented as planned.
The black listing was removed 30th November 2010 
wl- thia censorship
The Centre for the Resolution of the Emergency Situation (CRES) is currently censoring the website WikiLeaks in Thailand and more than 40,000
other webpages because of the emergency decree in Thailand imposed as a result of political instabilities (Emergency decree declared beginning of
April 2010). When trying to access the WikiLeaks website, internet users are redirected to this webpage.
wl- alleged harassment
According to The Times, WikiLeaks and its members have complained about continuing harassment and surveillance by law enforcement and intelligence
organizations, including extended detention, seizure of computers, veiled threats, “covert following and hidden photography.”
After the release of the 2007 airstrikes video and as they prepared to release film of the Granai airstrike, Julian Assange has said that his group of
volunteers came under intense surveillance. In an interview and Twitter posts he said that a restaurant in Reykjavik where his group of volunteers met
came under surveillance in March; there was "covert following and hidden photography" by police and foreign intelligence services; that an apparent
British intelligence agent made thinly veiled threats in a Luxembourg car park; and that one of the volunteers was detained by police for 21 hours.
Another volunteer posted that computers were seized, saying "If anything happens to us, you know why ... and you know who is responsible."
According to the Columbia Journalism Review, "the Icelandic press took a look at Assange’s charges of being surveilled in Iceland [...] and, at
best, have found nothing to substantiate them."
WikiLeaks has claimed that Facebook deleted their fan page, which had 30,000 fans.
wl- uk censorship
On 25 November 2010, the UK Defence, Press and Broadcasting Advisory Committee sent DA-Notices to UK newspapers regarding an expected major
publication by WikiLeaks of a "huge cache" of U.S. diplomatic cables. According to Index on Censorship, "DA-notices point to a set of
guidelines, agreed by the government departments and the media", and compliance is voluntary. According to the information technology journal
Thinq, DA-Notices "are generally adhered to."
In July 2010 Veterans for Peace president Mike Ferner editorialized on the group's website "neither Wikileaks nor the soldier or soldiers who
divulged the documents should be prosecuted for revealing this information. We should give them a medal.
Documentary filmmaker John Pilger wrote an August 2010 editorial in the Australian publication "Green Left" titled "Wikileaks Must Be Defended."
In it, Pilger said WikiLeaks represented the interests of "public accountability" and a new form of journalism at odds with "the dominant section
... devoted merely to taking down what cynical and malign power tells it."
Daniel Ellsberg has been a frequent defender of WikiLeaks. Following the November 2010 release of U.S. diplomatic cables, Ellsberg rejected criticism
that the site was endangering the lives of U.S. military personnel and intelligence assets stating "not one single soldier or informant has been in
danger from any of the WikiLeaks releases. That risk has been largely overblown." Ellsberg went on to note that government claims to the contrary
were "a script that they roll out every time there's a leak of any sort."
In 2008 Index on Censorship presented Wikileaks with their inaugural Economist New Media Award. In 2009 Amnesty International awarded WikiLeaks their
Media Award for exposing "extra judicial killings and disappearances" in Kenya. 
wl- Ecuadorian government
In late November 2010 the government of Ecuador made what was, apparently, an unsolicited public offer to Julian Assange to establish residency
in Ecuador. Deputy Foreign Minister Kinto Lucas stated "we are going to invite him to come to Ecuador so he can freely present the information he
possesses and all the documentation, not just on the Internet, but in various public forums."  Lucas went on to state his praise for WikiLeaks
and Assange calling them "[people] who are constantly investigating and trying to get light out of the dark corners of [state] information."
WikiLeaks has attracted criticism from a variety of sources.
In 2007 John Young, operator of cryptome, left his position on the WikiLeaks Board of Directors accusing the group of being a "CIA conduit." Young
subsequently retreated from his assertion but has continued to be critical of the site. In a 2010 interview with CNET.com Young accused the group
of a lack of transparency regarding their fundraising and financial management. He went on to state his belief that WikiLeaks could not guarantee
whistleblowers the anonymity or confidentiality they claimed and that he "would not trust them with information if it had any value, or if it put me
at risk or anyone that I cared about at risk."
Citing the leaking of the sorority rituals of Alpha Sigma Tau, Steven Aftergood has opined that WikiLeaks "does not respect the rule of law nor does
it honor the rights of individuals." Aftergood went on to state that WikiLeaks engages in unrestrained disclosure of non-governmental secrets without
compelling public policy reasons and that many anti-corruption activists were opposed to the site's activities.
In 2010 Amnesty International joined several other human rights groups criticizing WikiLeaks for not adequately redacting the names of Afghan
civilians working as U.S. military informants from files they had released. Julian Assange responded by offering Amnesty International staff the
opportunity to assist in the document vetting process. When Amnesty International appeared to express reservations in accepting the offer Assange
disclaimed the group as "people who prefer to do nothing but cover their asses." Other groups that joined Amnesty International in criticizing
WikiLeaks subsequently noted that, despite their displeasure over the issue of civilian name redaction, they generally appreciated WikiLeaks work.
In an August 2010 open letter, the non-governmental organization Reporters Without Borders praised WikiLeaks past usefulness in exposing "serious
violations of human rights and civil liberties" but criticized the group over a perceived absence of editorial control, stating "indiscriminately
publishing 92,000 classified reports reflects a real problem of methodology and, therefore, of credibility. Journalistic work involves the selection
of information. The argument with which you defend yourself, namely that Wikileaks is not made up of journalists, is not convincing." The group
subsequently clarified their statement as a criticism of WikiLeaks release procedure and not the organization itself, stating "we reaffirm our
support for Wikileaks, its work and its founding principles."
Many of the governments and organizations whose files have been leaked by WikiLeaks have been critical of the organization. Following the November
2010 release of United States diplomatic cables, U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton denounced the group saying, "this disclosure is not just an
attack on America's foreign policy interests, it is an attack on the international community." In an editorial published in The News, an
English-language Pakistani newspaper, U.S. ambassador Cameron Munter said the United States "condemned" WikiLeaks release of diplomatic cables.
Peter King, chairman of the Homeland Security Committee of the United States House of Representatives has stated his support for listing Wikileaks as
a "foreign terrorist organization" explaining that "WikiLeaks presents a clear and present danger to the national security of the United
wl- Icelandic Modern Media Initiative
In August 2009, Kaupthing, a large bank, succeeded in obtaining a court order gagging Iceland’s national broadcaster, RUV, from broadcasting a risk
analysis report showing the bank's substantial exposure to debt default risk. This information had been leaked by a whistleblower to WikiLeaks and
remained available on the WikiLeaks site; faced with an injunction minutes before broadcast the channel ran with a screen grab of the WikiLeaks site
instead of the scheduled piece on the bank. Citizens of Iceland felt outraged that RUV was prevented from broadcasting news of relevance.
Therefore, WikiLeaks has been credited with inspiring the Icelandic Modern Media Initiative, a bill meant to reclaim Iceland's 2007 Reporters Sans
Frontieres ranking as first in the world for free speech. It aims to enact a range of protections for sources, journalists, and publishers.
Birgitta Jónsdóttir, a former volunteer for WikiLeaks and member the Icelandic parliament, is the chief sponsor of the proposal.
wl- possible move to switzerland
On 4 November 2010, Julian Assange told Swiss public television TSR that he is seriously considering seeking political asylum in neutral Switzerland
and setting up a WikiLeaks foundation in the country to move the operation there. According to Assange, Switzerland and Iceland are the only
countries where WikiLeaks would feel safe to operate.
wl-Apparent Somali assassination order
WikiLeaks posted its first document in December 2006, a decision to assassinate government officials signed by Sheikh Hassan Dahir Aweys. The New
Yorker has reported that
[Julian] Assange and the others were uncertain of its authenticity, but they thought that readers, using Wikipedia-like features of the site,
would help analyze it. They published the decision with a lengthy commentary, which asked, “Is it a bold manifesto by a flamboyant Islamic militant
with links to Bin Laden? Or is it a clever smear by US intelligence, designed to discredit the Union, fracture Somali alliances and manipulate
China?” ... The document’s authenticity was never determined, and news about WikiLeaks quickly superseded the leak itself.
wl-Daniel arap Moi family corruption
On 31 August 2007, The Guardian (Britain) featured on its front page a story about corruption by the family of the former Kenyan leader Daniel arap
Moi. The newspaper stated that the source of the information was WikiLeaks.
wl-Bank Julius Baer lawsuit
Main article: Bank Julius Baer vs. Wikileaks lawsuit
In February 2008, the __._ domain name was taken offline after the Swiss Bank Julius Baer sued WikiLeaks and the __._ domain
registrar, Dynadot, in a court in California, United States, and obtained a permanent injunction ordering the shutdown. WikiLeaks had hosted
allegations of illegal activities at the bank's Cayman Island branch. WikiLeaks' U.S. Registrar, Dynadot, complied with the order by removing
its DNS entries. However, the website remained accessible via its numeric IP address, and online activists immediately mirrored WikiLeaks at dozens of
alternative websites worldwide.
The American Civil Liberties Union and the Electronic Frontier Foundation filed a motion protesting the censorship of WikiLeaks. The Reporters
Committee for Freedom of the Press assembled a coalition of media and press that filed an amicus curiae brief on WikiLeaks' behalf. The coalition
included major U.S. newspaper publishers and press organisations, such as the American Society of Newspaper Editors, The Associated Press, the Citizen
Media Law Project, The E.W. Scripps Company, the Gannett Company, The Hearst Corporation, the Los Angeles Times, the National Newspaper Publishers
Association, the Newspaper Association of America, The Radio-Television News Directors Association, and The Society of Professional Journalists. The
coalition requested to be heard as a friend of the court to call attention to relevant points of law that it believed the court had overlooked (on the
grounds that WikiLeaks had not appeared in court to defend itself, and that no First Amendment issues had yet been raised before the court). Amongst
other things, the coalition argued that:
"Wikileaks provides a forum for dissidents and whistleblowers across the globe to post documents, but the Dynadot injunction imposes a prior
restraint that drastically curtails access to Wikileaks from the Internet based on a limited number of postings challenged by Plaintiffs. The Dynadot
injunction therefore violates the bedrock principle that an injunction cannot enjoin all communication by a publisher or other speaker."
The same judge, Judge Jeffrey White, who issued the injunction vacated it on 29 February 2008, citing First Amendment concerns and questions about
legal jurisdiction. WikiLeaks was thus able to bring its site online again. The bank dropped the case on 5 March 2008. The judge also denied
the bank's request for an order prohibiting the website's publication.
The Executive Director of the Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press, Lucy Dalglish, commented:
"It's not very often a federal judge does a 180 degree turn in a case and dissolves an order. But we're very pleased the judge recognized the
constitutional implications in this prior restraint."
wl- Guantánamo Bay procedures
A copy of Standard Operating Procedures for Camp Delta–the protocol of the U.S. Army at the Guantánamo Bay detention camp–dated March 2003 was
released on the WikiLeaks website on 7 November 2007. The document, named "gitmo-sop.pdf", is also mirrored at The Guardian. Its release
revealed some of the restrictions placed over detainees at the camp, including the designation of some prisoners as off-limits to the International
Committee of the Red Cross, something that the U.S. military had in the past repeatedly denied.
On 3 December 2007, WikiLeaks released a copy of the 2004 edition of the manual, together with a detailed analysis of the changes.
On 7 April 2008, WikiLeaks reported receiving a letter (dated 27 March) from the Religious Technology Centre claiming ownership of several recently
leaked documents pertaining to OT Levels within the Church of Scientology. These same documents were at the center of a 1994 scandal. The email
“ The Advanced Technology materials are unpublished, copyrighted works. Please be advised that your customer's action in this regard violates
United States copyright law. Accordingly, we ask for your help in removing these works immediately from your service.
– Moxon and Kobrin
The letter continued on to request the release of the logs of the uploader, which would remove their anonymity. WikiLeaks responded with a statement
released on Wikinews stating: "in response to the attempted suppression, Wikileaks will release several thousand additional pages of Scientology
material next week", and did so.
wl-BNP membership list
After briefly appearing on a blog, the membership list of the far-right British National Party was posted to WikiLeaks on 18 November 2008. The name,
address, age and occupation of many of the 13,500 members were given, including several police officers, two solicitors, four ministers of religion,
at least one doctor, and a number of primary and secondary school teachers. In Britain, police officers are banned from joining or promoting the BNP,
and at least one officer was dismissed for being a member. The BNP was known for going to considerable lengths to conceal the identities of
members. On 19 November, BNP leader Nick Griffin stated that he knew the identity of the person who initially leaked the list on 17 November,
describing him as a "hardliner" senior employee who left the party in 2007. On 20 October 2009, a list of BNP members from April 2009
was leaked. This list contained 11,811 members.
In January 2009, over 600 internal United Nations reports (60 of them marked "strictly confidential") were leaked.
On 7 February 2009, WikiLeaks released 6,780 Congressional Research Service reports.
In March 2009, WikiLeaks published a list of contributors to the Norm Coleman senatorial campaign and a set of documents belonging to Barclays
Bank that had been ordered removed from the website of The Guardian.
wl-Climatic Research Unit emails
Main article: Climatic Research Unit email controversy
In November 2009, controversial documents, including e-mail correspondence between climate scientists, were released (allegedly after being illegally
obtained) from the University of East Anglia's (UEA) Climatic Research Unit (CRU). According to the university, the emails and documents were
obtained through a server hacking; one prominent host of the full 120MB archive was WikiLeaks.
wl-Internet censorship lists
WikiLeaks has published the lists of forbidden or illegal web addresses for several countries.
On 19 March 2009, WikiLeaks published what was alleged to be the Australian Communications and Media Authority's blacklist of sites to be banned
under Australia's proposed laws on Internet censorship. Reactions to the publication of the list by the Australian media and politicians were
varied. Particular note was made by journalistic outlets of the type of websites on the list; while the Internet censorship scheme submitted by the
Australian Labor Party in 2008 was proposed with the stated intention of preventing access to child pornography and sites related to terrorism,
the list leaked on WikiLeaks contains a number of sites unrelated to sex crimes involving minors. When questioned about the leak, Stephen
Conroy, the Minister for Broadband, Communications and the Digital Economy in Australia's Rudd Labor Government, responded by claiming that the list
was not the actual list, yet threatening to prosecute anyone involved in distributing it. On 20 March 2009, WikiLeaks published an updated list,
dated 18 March 2009; it more closely matches the claimed size of the ACMA blacklist, and contains two pages which have been independently confirmed to
be blacklisted by ACMA.
WikiLeaks also contains details of Internet censorship in Thailand, including lists of censored sites dating back to May 2006.
wl-Bilderberg Group meeting reports
Since May 2009, WikiLeaks has made available reports of several meetings of the Bilderberg Group. It includes the group's history and
meeting reports from the years 1955, 1956, 1957, 1958, 1960, 1962, 1963 and 1980.
wl-2008 Peru oil scandal
On 28 January 2009, WikiLeaks released 86 telephone intercept recordings of Peruvian politicians and businessmen involved in the "Petrogate" oil
scandal. The release of the tapes led the front pages of five Peruvian newspapers.
wl-Nuclear accident in Iran
On 16 July 2009, Iranian news agencies reported that the head of Iran's atomic energy organization Gholam Reza Aghazadeh had abruptly resigned for
unknown reasons after twelve years in office. Shortly afterwards WikiLeaks released a report disclosing a "serious nuclear accident" at the
Iranian Natanz nuclear facility in 2009. The Federation of American Scientists (FAS) released statistics according to which the number of
enriched centrifuges operational in Iran mysteriously declined from about 4,700 to about 3,900 beginning around the time the nuclear incident
WikiLeaks mentioned would have occurred.
According to media reports the accident may have been the direct result of a cyberattack at Iran's nuclear program, carried out with the Stuxnet
wl-Toxic dumping in Africa: The Minton report
In September 2006, commodities giant Trafigura commissioned an internal report about a toxic dumping incident in the Ivory Coast, which
(according to the United Nations) affected 108,000 people. The document, called the Minton Report, names various harmful chemicals "likely to be
present" in the waste — sodium hydroxide, cobalt phthalocyanine sulfonate, coker naphtha, thiols, sodium alkanethiolate, sodium hydrosulfide,
sodium sulfide, dialkyl disulfides, hydrogen sulfide — and notes that some of them "may cause harm at some distance". The report states that
potential health effects include "burns to the skin, eyes and lungs, vomiting, diarrhea, loss of consciousness and death", and suggests that the
high number of reported casualties is "consistent with there having been a significant release of hydrogen sulphide gas".
On 11 September 2009, Trafigura's lawyers, Carter-Ruck, obtained a secret "super-injunction" against The Guardian, banning that newspaper from
publishing the contents of the document. Trafigura also threatened a number of other media organizations with legal action if they published the
report's contents, including the Norwegian Broadcasting Corporation and The Chemical Engineer magazine. On 14 September 2009, WikiLeaks
posted the report.
On 12 October, Carter-Ruck warned The Guardian against mentioning the content of a parliamentary question that was due to be asked about the report.
Instead, the paper published an article stating that they were unable to report on an unspecified question and claiming that the situation appeared to
"call into question privileges guaranteeing free speech established under the 1689 Bill of Rights". The suppressed details rapidly circulated
via the internet and Twitter and, amid uproar, Carter-Ruck agreed the next day to the modification of the injunction before it was
challenged in court, permitting The Guardian to reveal the existence of the question and the injunction. The injunction was lifted on 16
WikiLeaks has made available an internal _174] from Kaupthing Bank from just prior to the collapse of Iceland's banking sector, which led to
the 2008–2009 Icelandic financial crisis. The document shows that suspiciously large sums of money were loaned to various owners of the bank, and
large debts written off. Kaupthing's lawyers have threatened WikiLeaks with legal action, citing banking privacy laws. The leak has caused an uproar
in Iceland. Criminal charges relating to the multibillion euro loans to Exista and other major shareholders are being investigated. The bank is
seeking to recover loans taken out by former bank employees before its collapse.
wl- Joint Services Protocol 440
Joint Services Protocol 440 ("JSP 440") is the name of a British 2001 Ministry of Defense 2,400-page restricted document for security containing
instructions for avoiding leaks in the information flow caused by hackers, journalists, and foreign spies. The protocol was posted on
WikiLeaks on 3 October 2009.
wl-9/11 pager messages
On 25 November 2009, WikiLeaks released 570,000 intercepts of pager messages sent on the day of the September 11 attacks. Bradley
Manning (see below) commented that those were obvious NSA intercepts. Among the released messages are communications between Pentagon officials
and New York City Police Department.
wl- U.S. Intelligence report on WikiLeaks
On 15 March 2010, WikiLeaks released a secret 32-page U.S. Department of Defense Counterintelligence Analysis Report from March 2008. The document
described some prominent reports leaked on the website which related to U.S. security interests and described potential methods of marginalizing the
organization. WikiLeaks editor Julian Assange said that some details in the Army report were inaccurate and its recommendations flawed, and also
that the concerns of the U.S. Army raised by the report were hypothetical. The report discussed deterring potential whistleblowers via
termination of employment and criminal prosecution of any existing or former insiders, leakers or whistleblowers. Reasons for the report include
notable leaks such as U.S. equipment expenditure, human rights violations in Guantanamo Bay and the battle over the Iraqi town of Fallujah.
wl-Baghdad airstrike video
Main article: July 12, 2007 Baghdad airstrike
On 5 April 2010, WikiLeaks released classified U.S. military footage from a series of attacks on 12 July 2007 in Baghdad by a U.S. helicopter that
killed 12, including two Reuters news staff, Saeed Chmagh and Namir Noor-Eldeen, on a website called "Collateral Murder". The footage consisted of a
39-minute unedited version and an 18-minute version which had been edited and annotated. Analysis of the video indicates that the pilots thought the
men were carrying weapons (which were actually camera equipment). When asked if they were sure that the men were carrying weapons, they answered in
the affirmative. The military conducted an "informal" investigation into the incident, but has yet to release the investigative materials (such
as the sworn statements of the soldiers involved or the battle damage assessment) that were used, causing the report to be criticized as
In the week following the release, "Wikileaks" was the search term with the most significant growth worldwide in the last seven days as measured by
wl- Arrest of Bradley Manning
Main article: Bradley Manning
A 22-year-old US Army intelligence analyst, PFC (formerly SPC) Bradley Manning, was arrested after alleged chat logs were turned in to the authorities
by former hacker Adrian Lamo, in whom he had confided. Manning reportedly told Lamo he had leaked the "Collateral Murder" video, in addition to a
video of the Granai airstrike and around 260,000 diplomatic cables, to WikiLeaks. WikiLeaks said "allegations in Wired that we have been
sent 260,000 classified US embassy cables are, as far as we can tell, incorrect." WikiLeaks have said that they are unable as yet to confirm
whether or not Manning was actually the source of the video, stating "we never collect personal information on our sources", but that they have
nonetheless "taken steps to arrange for his protection and legal defence." On 21 June Julian Assange told The Guardian that WikiLeaks had
hired three US criminal lawyers to defend Manning but that they had not been given access to him.
Manning reportedly wrote, "Everywhere there’s a U.S. post, there’s a diplomatic scandal that will be revealed." According to the Washington
Post, he also described the cables as "explaining how the first world exploits the third, in detail, from an internal perspective."
wl-Afghan War documents leak
Main article: Afghan War documents leak
On 25 July 2010, WikiLeaks released to The Guardian, The New York Times, and Der Spiegel over 92,000 documents related to the war in Afghanistan
between 2004 and the end of 2009. The documents detail individual incidents including friendly fire and civilian casualties. The scale of leak
was described by Julian Assange as comparable to that of the Pentagon Papers in the 1970s. The documents were released to the public on 25 July 2010.
On 29 July 2010 WikiLeaks added a 1.4 GB "Insurance File" to the Afghan War Diary page. The file is AES encrypted and has been speculated to serve
as insurance in case the WikiLeaks website or its spokesman Julian Assange are incapacitated, upon which the passphrase could be published
About 15,000 of the 92,000 documents have not yet been released on WikiLeaks, as the group is currently reviewing the documents to remove some of the
sources of the information. Speaking to a group in London in August 2010, Assange said that the group will "absolutely" release the remaining
documents. He stated that WikiLeaks has requested help from the Pentagon and human-rights groups to help redact the names, but has not received any
assistance. He also stated that WikiLeaks is "not obligated to protect other people's sources...unless it is from unjust retribution."
According to a report on the Daily Beast website, the Obama administration has asked Britain, Germany and Australia among others to consider bringing
criminal charges against Assange for the Afghan war leaks and to help limit Assange's travels across international borders. In the United
States, a joint investigation by the Army and the Federal Bureau of Investigation may try to prosecute "Mr. Assange and others involved on grounds
they encouraged the theft of government property".
The Australia Defence Association (ADA) stated that WikiLeaks' Julian Assange "could have committed a serious criminal offence in helping an enemy
of the Australian Defence Force (ADF)." Neil James, the executive director of ADA, states: "Put bluntly, Wikileaks is not authorised in
international or Australian law, nor equipped morally or operationally, to judge whether open publication of such material risks the safety, security,
morale and legitimate objectives of Australian and allied troops fighting in a UN-endorsed military operation."
WikiLeaks' recent leaking of classified U.S. intelligence has been described by commentator of The Wall Street Journal as having "endangered the
lives of Afghan informants" and "the dozens of Afghan civilians named in the document dump as U.S. military informants. Their lives, as well as
those of their entire families, are now at terrible risk of Taliban reprisal." When interviewed, Assange stated that WikiLeaks has withheld some
15,000 documents that identify informants to avoid putting their lives at risk. Specifically, Voice of America reported in August 2010 that Assange,
responding to such criticisms, stated that the 15,000 still held documents are being reviewed "line by line," and that the names of "innocent
parties who are under reasonable threat" will be removed. Greg Gutfeld of Fox News described the leaking as "WikiLeaks' Crusade Against the
U.S. Military." John Pilger has reported that prior to the release of the Afghan War Diaries in July, WikiLeaks contacted the White House in
writing, asking that it identify names that might draw reprisals, but received no response.
According to the New York Times, Amnesty International and Reporters Without Borders criticized WikiLeaks for what they saw as risking people’s
lives by identifying Afghans acting as informers. A Taliban spokesman said that the Taliban had formed a nine-member "commission" to review the
documents "to find about people who are spying." He said the Taliban had a "wanted" list of 1,800 Afghans and was comparing that with names
WikiLeaks provided, stating "after the process is completed, our Taliban court will decide about such people."
wl- love parade
Sometime after the Love Parade stampede in Duisburg, Germany on 24 July 2010, the local news blog Xtranews published internal documents of the city
administration regarding Love Parade planning and actions by the authorities. The city government reacted by acquiring a court order on 16 August
forcing Xtranews to remove the documents from its blog. Two days later, however, after the documents had surfaced on other websites as well, the
government stated that it would not conduct any further legal actions against the publication of the documents. On 20 August WikiLeaks released a
publication titled Loveparade 2010 Duisburg planning documents, 2007-2010, which comprised 43 internal documents regarding the Love Parade
wl- iraqi war logs
Main article: Iraq War documents leak
Wikinews has related news: Wikileaks Releases Iraq War Logs
In October 2010, it was reported that WikiLeaks was planning to release up to 400,000 documents relating to the Iraq War. Julian Assange
initially denied the reports, stating: "WikiLeaks does not speak about upcoming releases dates, indeed, with very rare exceptions we do not
communicate any specific information about upcoming releases, since that simply provides fodder for abusive organizations to get their spin machines
ready." The Guardian reported on 21 October 2010 that it had received almost 400,000 Iraq war documents from WikiLeaks. On 22 October 2010,
Al Jazeera was the first to release analyses of the leak, dubbed The War Logs. WikiLeaks posted a tweet that "Al Jazeera have broken our embargo by
30 minutes. We release everyone from their Iraq War Logs embargoes." This prompted other news organizations to release their articles based on the
source material. The release of the documents coincided with a return of the main __._ website, which had been offering no content since 30
The BBC quoted the Pentagon referring to the Iraq War Logs as "the largest leak of classified documents in its history." Media coverage of the
leaked documents focused on claims that the U.S. government had ignored reports of torture by the Iraqi authorities during the period after the 2003
wl-Diplomatic cables release
Main article: United States diplomatic cables leak
Wikinews has news on this topic:
* Wikileaks to release thousands of secret documents; 'international embarrassment' likely, 27 November 2010
* Files will risk 'countless' lives, Obama administration warns Wikileaks, 28 November 2010
* Wikileaks website attacked; millions of files to be released tonight, 28 November 2010
On 22 November 2010 an announcement was made by the WikiLeaks twitter feed that the next release would be "7x the size of the Iraq War
Logs." U.S. authorities and the media have speculated that they may contain diplomatic cables. Prior to the expected leak, the
government of the United Kingdom (UK) sent a DA-Notice to UK newspapers, which requests advance notice from the newspapers regarding the expected
publication. According to Index on Censorship, "there is no obligation on media to comply". "Newspaper editors would speak to [the] Defence,
Press and Broadcasting Advisory Committee prior to publication." The Pakistani newspaper Dawn stated that the U.S. newspapers The New York Times
and The Washington Post were expected to publish parts of the diplomatic cables on Sunday 28 November, including 94 Pakistan-related
On 26 November, via his lawyer Jennifer Robinson, Assange sent a letter to the US Department of State, asking for information regarding people who
could be placed at "significant risk of harm" by the diplomatic cables release. Harold Koh, Legal Adviser of the Department of State,
refused the proposal, stating, "We will not engage in a negotiation regarding the further release or dissemination of illegally obtained U.S.
Government classified materials."
On 28 November, Wikileaks announced it was undergoing a massive Distributed Denial-of-service attack, but vowed to still leak the cables and
documents via prominent media outlets including El País, Le Monde, Der Spiegel, The Guardian, and The New York Times. The announcement was
shortly thereafter followed by the online publication, by The Guardian, of some of the purported diplomatic cables including one in which United
States Secretary of State Hillary Clinton apparently orders diplomats to obtain credit card and frequent flier numbers of the French, British, Russian
and Chinese delegations to the United Nations Security Council. Other revelations reportedly include that several Arab nations urged the U.S. to
launch a first strike on Iran, that the Chinese government was directly involved in computer hacking, and that the U.S. is pressuring Pakistan to turn
over nuclear material to prevent it from falling into the wrong hands. The cables also include unflattering appraisals of world leaders. U.S.
congressman Peter T. King called for WikiLeaks to be designated as a terrorist organization in response to the leak of the cables.
U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton responded to the leaks saying, "This disclosure is not just an attack on America's foreign policy; it is an
attack on the international community, the alliances and partnerships, the conventions and negotiations that safeguard global security and advance
economic prosperity." Julian Assange is quoted as saying, "Of course, abusive, Titanic organizations, when exposed, grasp at all sorts of ridiculous
straws to try and distract the public from the true nature of the abuse."
wl-Announcements on upcoming leaks
In May 2010, WikiLeaks said they had video footage of a massacre of civilians in Afghanistan by the U.S. military which they were preparing to
In an interview with Chris Anderson on 19 July 2010, Assange showed a document WikiLeaks had on an Albanian oil well blowout, and said they also had
material from inside BP, and that they were "getting enormous quantity of whistle-blower disclosures of a very high caliber" but added
that they have not been able to verify and release the material because they do not have enough volunteer journalists.
In October 2010, Assange told a leading Moscow newspaper that "The Kremlin had better brace itself for a coming wave of WikiLeaks disclosures about
Russia." Assange later clarified: "we have material on many business and governments, including in Russia. It’s not right to say
there’s going to be a particular focus on Russia".
In an interview with Forbes magazine, Assange announced that WikiLeaks was planning another "megaleak" for early in 2011, which this time would be
from inside the private sector and involve "a big U.S. bank". That may lead to the failure of bank involved.
1. ^ a b c d e f "Wikileaks:About". WikiLeaks. Archived from the original on 14 March 2008.
web.archive.org...://www.__._/wiki/Wikileaks:About. Retrieved 3 June 2009.
2. ^ "__._ – Traffic Details from Alexa". Alexa Internet, Inc. www.alexa.com... Retrieved 27 November
3. ^ "Wikileaks has 1.2 million documents?". WikiLeaks. Archived from the original on 16 February 2008.
web.archive.org...://www.__._/wiki/Wikileaks:About#Wikileaks_has_1.2_million_documents.3F. Retrieved 28 February
4. ^ McGreal, Chris. Wikileaks reveals video showing U.S. air crew shooting down Iraqi civilians, The Guardian, 5 April 2010.
5. ^ Winners of Index on Censorship Freedom of Expression Award Announced[dead link] 22 April 2008
6. ^ Kenya: The Cry of Blood – Extra Judicial Killings and Disappearances, Sep 2008[dead link] WikiLeaks.
7. ^ Amnesty announces Media Awards 2009 winners Amnesty.org.uk, 2 June 2009
8. ^ Reso, Paulina (20 May 2010). "5 pioneering Web sites that could totally change the news". Daily News.
www.nydailynews.com... Retrieved 8 June 2010.
9. ^ "AP Interview: WikiLeaks to publish new documents". 8 August 2010.
hosted.ap.org... Retrieved 8 August 2010. [dead link]
10. ^ "Wikipedia co-founder Jimmy Wales slams WikiLeaks: It's not even a 'wiki'". Nydailynews.com. 2010-09-28.
11. ^ Steven Aftergood (3 January 2007). "Wikileaks and untraceable document disclosure". Secrecy News (Federation of American Scientists).
www.fas.org... Retrieved 28 February 2008.
12. ^ Paul Marks (13 January 2007). "How to leak a secret and not get caught". New Scientist.
www.newscientist.com... Retrieved 28 February 2008.
13. ^ Agence France Press (11 January 2007). "Chinese cyber-dissidents launch WikiLeaks, a site for whistleblowers". The Age (Melbourne).
www.theage.com.au... Retrieved 17
14. ^ Richard Guilliatt (May 30, 2009). "Rudd Government blacklist hacker monitors police". The Australian.
www.theaustralian.com.au... Retrieved 17 June 2010.
15. ^ "WikiLeaks Founder on the Run, Trailed by Notoriety". www.nytimes.com...
16. ^ "WikiLeaks:Advisory Board". WikiLeaks. http://__._/wiki/WikiLeaks:Advisory_Board. Retrieved 16 June 2010. [dead link]
17. ^ "Inside WikiLeaks’ Leak Factory". Mother Jones. motherjones.com...
Retrieved 30 April 2010.
18. ^ "Cyber-dissidents launch WikiLeaks, a site for whistleblowers". South China Morning Post. 11 January 2007. Archived from the original on 12
February 2007. web.archive.org...://www.asiamedia.ucla.edu/article-eastasia.asp?parentid=60857. Retrieved 28 February
19. ^ Kearny (11 January 2007). "Wikileaks and Untraceable Document Disclosure". Now Public News. Archived from the original on 27 September 2007.
web.archive.org...://www.nowpublic.com/wikileaks_and_untraceable_document_disclosure. Retrieved 28 February 2008. ,
20. ^ a b c "WikiLeaks and Julian Paul Assange". The New Yorker.
www.newyorker.com... Retrieved 8 June 2010.
21. ^ "Wiktionary definition of tranche". En.wiktionary.org. 13 October 2010. en.wiktionary.org... Retrieved 22 October
22. ^ "Wikileaks denies Tor hacker eavesdropping gave site its starte". The Register.
www.theregister.co.uk... Retrieved 10 July 2010.
23. ^ "Wikileaks Releases Secret Report on Military Equipment". The New York Sun. 9 September 2007. www.nysun.com... Retrieved
28 February 2008.
24. ^ "Leak secrets trouble free". Scenta. 15 January 2007. Archived from the original on 27 November 2007.
web.archive.org...://www.scenta.co.uk/scenta/news.cfm?cit_id=1432293&FAArea1=widgets.content_view_1. Retrieved 28 February
25. ^ Scott Bradner "Wikileaks: a site for exposure", Linuxworld, 18 January 2007. Retrieved 18 January 2007.
26. ^ Scott Bradner "Wikileaks: a site for exposure", Linuxworld, 18 January 2007. Retrieved 18 January 2007.
27. ^ Staff Reports (18 January 2007). "Whistleblower Website Coming". Free-Market News Network.
www.freemarketnews.com... Retrieved 28 February 2008. [dead link]
28. ^ "twitter.com/wikiLeaks at 1.24am 24 Dec 2009". Twitter.com. 24 December 2009. twitter.com... Retrieved 30
29. ^ "Wikileaks is overloaded". WikiLeaks. http://__._/. Retrieved 31 December 2009. "To concentrate on raising the funds necessary to
keep us alive into 2010, we have reluctantly suspended all other operations, but will be back soon."__._
30. ^ "Wikileaks Mirror". WikiLeaks. mirror.wikileaks.info... Retrieved 13 February 2010.
31. ^ "Another Wikileaks Mirror". WikiLeaks. mirror.infoboj.eu... Retrieved 13 February 2010.
32. ^ "Wikileaks is overloaded". WikiLeaks. http://__._/. Retrieved 17 February 2010.
33. ^ Butselaar, Emily (29 January 2010). "Dig deep for Wikileaks". London: The Guardian.
www.guardian.co.uk... Retrieved 30 January 2010.
34. ^ a b c d e Interview with Julian Assange, spokesperson of Wikileaks: Leak-o-nomy: The Economy of Wikileaks.
35. ^ WikiLeaks. "at 7:42am 5 Jan 2010". Twitter.com. twitter.com... Retrieved 30 April 2010.
36. ^ "www.twitter.com/wikileaks at 3 February 5.51pm". Twitter.com. twitter.com... Retrieved 30 April 2010.
37. ^ "Paypal has again locked our...". WikiLeaks. Twitter. http://__._/. Retrieved 26 January 2010.
38. ^ "Paypal has freed up our...". WikiLeaks. Twitter. twitter.com... Retrieved 26 January 2010.
39. ^ .
40. ^ No Secrets, by Raffi Khatchadourian, New Yorker, 7 June 2010.
41. ^ a b Cohen, Noam (17 June 2010). "Knight Foundation Hands Out Grants to 12 Groups, but Not WikiLeaks - Media Decoder Blog - NYTimes.com".
Retrieved 1 August 2010.
42. ^ a b WikiLeaks questions why it was rejected for Knight grant Yahoo! News, 17 June 2010
43. ^ a b Previous post Next post. "Wikileaks Reopens for Leakers | Threat Level". Wired.com.
www.wired.com... Retrieved 1 August 2010.
44. ^ McCullagh, Declan (16 July 2010). "Feds look for Wikileaks founder at NYC hacker event | Security - CNET News". News.cnet.com.
news.cnet.com... Retrieved 1 August 2010.
45. ^ Jacob Appelbaum WikiLeaks Next HOPE Keynote Transcript - 07/17/10
46. ^ "TED Blog | Updated: Surprise speaker at TEDGlobal: Julian Assange in Session 12". Blog.ted.com.
blog.ted.com... Retrieved 1 August 2010.
47. ^ "Julian Assange - TED Talk - Wikileaks". Geekosystem. 19 July 2010. www.geekosystem.com... Retrieved 1
48. ^ a b c d Mills, Elinor (28 July 2010). "Researcher detained at U.S. border, questioned about Wikileaks | InSecurity Complex - CNET News".
News.cnet.com. news.cnet.com... Retrieved 1 August 2010.
49. ^ a b "Wau Holland Foundation sheds light on Wikileaks donations - Hardware, ISP, travelling costs". TechEye. 13 July 2010.
www.techeye.net... Retrieved 1 August 2010.
50. ^ Theunis Bates Contributor. "WikiLeaks' Woes Grow as Spokesman Quits Site". Aolnews.com.
www.aolnews.com... Retrieved 22 October 2010.
51. ^ "WikiLeaks chief lashes out at media during debate". Google.com. 30 September 2010.
www.google.com... Retrieved 22 October 2010. [dead link]
52. ^ "WikiLeaks Spokesman Quits, Blasts Founder Julian Assange As Paranoid Control Freak, Admits To Using Fake Name", by Henry Blodget, September
28, 2010, San Francisco Chronicle
53. ^ "WikiLeaks' Woes Grow as Spokesman Quits Site". Aolnews.com.
www.aolnews.com... extra DIV