It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Human_Alien
reply to post by wmd_2008
I'm sorry I didn't get back to you in a more timely manner and right now, I am too tired to type a cohesive sentence let alone debate ya but I think I obtained some information from here
If that's not the correct page, I'll look for it tomorrow in my bookmarks.
I am too tired to type a cohesive sentence let alone debate ya but I think I obtained some information from here
18. The structure was revolutionary. Its main supports were external, lining the four corners of each tower.
101. It is the first skyscraper in the world destroyed by terrorists
Originally posted by backwherewestarted
A few things I learned from this thread:
1) Conspiracy people will believe anything that supports their theory no matter where it comes from.
2) The aforementioned will refuse to believe anything that does not support their theory no matter where it comes from.
3) Some people need to know what they are saying before the post. (i.e "assinine" instead of "asinine" and "Another words" instead of "In other words.")
4) Conspiracy folks are more then willing to make things up to use as support for their theory. (i.e. The NYC to DC road)
5) Anyone who was actually their is only to be believed if they support the conspiracy, otherwise they are a liar.
And people wonder why the conspiracy people are looked to as nutjobs?!?!?!
Originally posted by backinblack
Originally posted by backwherewestarted
A few things I learned from this thread:
1) Conspiracy people will believe anything that supports their theory no matter where it comes from.
2) The aforementioned will refuse to believe anything that does not support their theory no matter where it comes from.
3) Some people need to know what they are saying before the post. (i.e "assinine" instead of "asinine" and "Another words" instead of "In other words.")
4) Conspiracy folks are more then willing to make things up to use as support for their theory. (i.e. The NYC to DC road)
5) Anyone who was actually their is only to be believed if they support the conspiracy, otherwise they are a liar.
And people wonder why the conspiracy people are looked to as nutjobs?!?!?!
If you are going to be so childish as to correct gramatical errors then I think you should check your own writing better..
"Anyone who was actually their"
Their what?? Or did you mean there???
You guys kill me...
Interesting how I mention a number of things and you focus on a spelling mistake (not a grammatical error as you claimed and you should learn to spell grammatical before you use it.). I am not surprised after reading "you guys kill me" clearly you feel I am talking about you specifically.
Originally posted by backinblack
reply to post by backwherewestarted
Interesting how I mention a number of things and you focus on a spelling mistake (not a grammatical error as you claimed and you should learn to spell grammatical before you use it.). I am not surprised after reading "you guys kill me" clearly you feel I am talking about you specifically.
No, what's interesting is that YOU chose to attack posters with mundane spelling mistakes..
Yes, I'm not perfect when I type because I usually type fast but then I don't normaly attack others for "their" mistakes either...
And you prove my point.
Is my leaving out of one M in grammatical of any relevance to the debate??
No, it's just BS nit picking to try and make you feel superior.
Edit: Oh and useing "their" instead of "there" IS a grammatical error, not a mere spelling mistake..
I don't see how you could possibly think overwise...
edit on 13-12-2010 by backinblack because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by backwherewestarted
A few things I learned from this thread
1) Conspiracy people will believe anything that supports their theory no matter where it comes from.:
2) The aforementioned will refuse to believe anything that does not support their theory no matter where it comes from.
3) Some people need to know what they are saying before the post. (i.e "assinine" instead of "asinine" and "Another words" instead of "In other words.")
4) Conspiracy folks are more then willing to make things up to use as support for their theory. (i.e. The NYC to DC road)
5) Anyone who was actually their is only to be believed if they support the conspiracy, otherwise they are a liar.
And people wonder why the conspiracy people are looked to as nutjobs?!?!?!
Originally posted by backwherewestarted
A few things I learned from this thread:
1) Conspiracy people will believe anything that supports their theory no matter where it comes from.
Originally posted by backwherewestarted
A few things I learned from this thread:
2) The aforementioned will refuse to believe anything that does not support their theory no matter where it comes from.
Originally posted by backwherewestarted
3) Some people need to know what they are saying before the post. (i.e "assinine" instead of "asinine" and "Another words" instead of "In other words.")
Originally posted by backwherewestarted
4) Conspiracy folks are more then willing to make things up to use as support for their theory. (i.e. The NYC to DC road)
Originally posted by backwherewestarted
5) Anyone who was actually their is only to be believed if they support the conspiracy, otherwise they are a liar.
Originally posted by backwherewestarted
And people wonder why the conspiracy people are looked to as nutjobs?!?!?!
Efforts to skew 9/11 skepticism as a lunatic fringe belief are disproved by the polls
An October 2006 New York Times/CBS poll found that a paltry 16% of Americans thought the government was telling the truth about 9/11 and the intelligence prior to the attacks, meaning 84% doubted the accuracy of the official story.
In addition, the same poll found that 67% also faulted the 9/11 Commission for not investigating anomalous collapse of World Trade Center 7.
Originally posted by Cassius666
Originally posted by backwherewestarted
A few things I learned from this thread:
1) Conspiracy people will believe anything that supports their theory no matter where it comes from.
Why it is believers who exclusively believe what an American National anything says, ignoring the fact that they are an heavily biased and controlled source in this case, ignoring what experts on all other countries says.
Originally posted by backwherewestarted
A few things I learned from this thread:
2) The aforementioned will refuse to believe anything that does not support their theory no matter where it comes from.
I am still waiting for a source that is not an American National anything to support the OS
Originally posted by backwherewestarted
3) Some people need to know what they are saying before the post. (i.e "assinine" instead of "asinine" and "Another words" instead of "In other words.")
While you are technically correct spellchecking is a safe indicator for desperation.
Originally posted by backwherewestarted
4) Conspiracy folks are more then willing to make things up to use as support for their theory. (i.e. The NYC to DC road)
I have seen so far believers in the OS well, believe in special science and magic for their conspiracy theory to unfold as it has been told. I have seen a cold analytical mind by the so called truthers who put forward some effort to debunk the people who presented theories without basis, such as the no plane theory and others I forgot about. They put the same effort forward to debunk these as they did with the official conspiracy theory. Of course the blievers were thankfull for all that work and were quick to use any of them as a strawman argument.
Originally posted by backwherewestarted
5) Anyone who was actually their is only to be believed if they support the conspiracy, otherwise they are a liar.
That is not true. I am not aware of anybody who was there and claims there were no explosions for example.
Originally posted by backwherewestarted
And people wonder why the conspiracy people are looked to as nutjobs?!?!?!
It isnt 2001 anymore. The people who believe in the OS are a small exclusive club, at least outside of America and even in America the ratio is fairly balanced.
But for the most part, the blievers believe in magic and have a fascination for tinfoil hats.edit on 14-12-2010 by Cassius666 because: (no reason given)edit on 14-12-2010 by Cassius666 because: (no reason given)edit on 14-12-2010 by Cassius666 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Cassius666
reply to post by backwherewestarted
What do you mean? It says originally posted by and your name pops up, so by all means DO feel adressed.
I did not say Americans can not be trusted. The 911 truth movement originated from America, by Americans who were whitnesses and had access to the evidence to some degree, like I dont know, the firefighters who were there and survived. Why should the New York firefighters of all people lie to us and indirectly protect the people who according to the OS killed their dear friends, in many cases even family?
A National American anything can not be trusted, no, not when they have an agenda and are therefore biased. Its like asking the Nazi party to be judge and jury at the nürnberg trials. If they are not lying, then they should be able to withstand peer review by multiple unbiased sources.
No luck so far and Scandinavia does not hate America, Germany does not hate America many other countries do not hate America and I cant think of a reason why there would be a worldwide conspiracy against the NIST report.edit on 14-12-2010 by Cassius666 because: (no reason given)