It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
JOHN Howard has challenged the US to adopt a less hostile stance towards a booming China, arguing the Asian superpower's continued rise is "good for the world".
With Australia seeking to forge closer economic ties with Beijing, the Prime Minister has played down US concerns over China's economic march into Western economies and its belligerent attitude towards Taiwan.
He did not specifically name Taiwan in a speech to the Asia Society in New York.
"As China assumes a greater strategic and economic weight in Asia in the 21st century, it will inevitably place some stress on the international system," he said.
"But to see China's rise in zero-sum terms is overly pessimistic, intellectually misguided and potentially dangerous."
The US has expressed concerns over China's rapid economic gains and the incursion of cheaper manufactured goods into the massive American market.
Article 10
For the purposes of the present Treaty, nationals of the Republic of China shall be deemed to include all the inhabitants and former inhabitants of Taiwan (Formosa) and Penghu (the Pescadores) and their descendents who are of the Chinese nationality in accordance with the laws and regulations which have been or may hereafter be enforced by the Republic of China in Taiwan (Formosa) and Penghu (the Pescadores); and juridical persons of the Republic of China shall be deemed to include all those registered under the laws and regulations which have been or may hereafter be enforced by the Republic of China in Taiwan (Formosa) and Penghu (the Pescadores).
Originally posted by bodebliss
The US has expressed concern over China's unfair trade practices and this after it joined the WTO.
Howard's full of bull!
This would be like I gave a car and it's title away to someone, and then I told you it's yours. The second gesture is meaningless.
Originally posted by bodebliss
The San Francisco Treaty
Signed at San Francisco, 8 September 1951
Initial entry into force*: 28 April 1952
Article 2
(b) Japan renounces all right, title and claim to Formosa and the Pescadores.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Treaty of Peace between the Republic of China and Japan
Signed at Taipei, 28 April 1952
Entered into force, 5 August 1952, by the exchange of the instruments of ratification at Taipei
The treaty with the Roc entered into after the San Francisco treaty took effect, did not take effect until August 5th 1952 making the clause you mentioned void.
Originally posted by ludahai
One should note, in the SFPT, no beneficiary is named, something that is required under international law to transfer territory from one state to another. This left Taiwan legally terra res nullius, making continued KMT rule of the island without benefit of a plebiscite unlawful.
Originally posted by chinawhite
america signed a treaty with japan and the ROC signed a treaty with japan.
Originally posted by ludahai
Japan signed a treaty now only with the United States, but with TWENTY-TWO allies, of which the United States was only one. In that treaty, Japan gave up all sovereign rights to the island of Taiwan. Neither Chinese government was in San Francisco. Once Japan signs the rights of the territory way, it has absolutely no authority under the traditions of international law to then sign another treaty assigning sovereignty of that territory. If anyone had that right following the SFPT, it was the 22 allied powers that were signatories to the treaty, and not Japan.
Furthermore, your own beloved PRC government doesn't recognize the Japan-ROC treaty because as far as they are concerned the ROC had no legal right to represent China.