It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Can China Invade Taiwan?

page: 121
1
<< 118  119  120    122  123  124 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Aug, 19 2005 @ 07:23 AM
link   

Originally posted by chinawhite
not the 5% of chinas richest people. whihc controlled over 95% of the wealth. the communist stopped illegal substances, prostitution , warloads, and foriegn occupation

Are you sure thats all?



yeah the other party , that was forced to go to taiwan

not only "the other party"..



Difinition of a communist is -

1. A member of a Marxist-Leninist party.
2. A supporter of such a party or movement.

remember we are talking about communist

Yeah but if you read ABOUT it not look up the dictionary (which BTW is racist) you will notice everyone IS equal, that means NO countries.




posted on Aug, 19 2005 @ 07:24 AM
link   
THE TANK MAN

en.wikipedia.org...



posted on Aug, 19 2005 @ 07:26 AM
link   

Originally posted by chinawhite
remember that china has brought or produced a lot of these missiles and the systems for tracking LO planes and missiles

China has produced lots of copies, how and where they work is another fact.



sino is a link but not when its talking about taiwan.

How not?


no its not

So now you dispute the laws of physics?




wait i need time for this. forgot the countries

Take your time..



and those tactics are still used in modern warfare. those people will not starve to death but starve enough.

They will starve to death IF you do so.

Used by who?
The chinese?
This tactic is quite frankly moraly and legally wrong.



and you think they can sustain 50,000 men with out resupply?

Possibly, if they have supplies already there.
Atleast until the task forces arrive.



posted on Aug, 19 2005 @ 07:27 AM
link   

Originally posted by devilwasp

Are you sure thats all?


no. i dont have time to go over everything. you should do some reading on pre-revolutionary china.



not only "the other party"..


and their supporters. landlords traditors of china that spported japan.

numerous books in english and chinese have been written about why the communist won the civil war. and what were the repercussions



Yeah but if you read ABOUT it not look up the dictionary (which BTW is racist) you will notice everyone IS equal, that means NO countries.


no its communism not communist. there is a difference that clearly you dont know



posted on Aug, 19 2005 @ 07:32 AM
link   

Originally posted by devilwasp
China has produced lots of copies, how and where they work is another fact.


Copies?? any proof on this. china only produced the russian SA-2 in limited numbers as the HQ-1 then produced the HQ-2 which was a modifled HQ-1 with a New guidence system



How not?


because he is a westerner chinese. or BBC british born chinese




So now you dispute the laws of physics?


your laws





Take your time..


ok




They will starve to death IF you do so.


the war will end so quick they wont



Used by who?
The chinese?
This tactic is quite frankly moraly and legally wrong.


WW2, korean war, vietnam war. falklands. ring any bells




Possibly, if they have supplies already there.
Atleast until the task forces arrive.


task force right next to chians coast with thousands of Anti-ship missiles in range



posted on Aug, 19 2005 @ 07:35 AM
link   
and about americans bases.

they were asked to leave the subic bay in philippines and more recently asked to leave their middle eastern base in uzbekistan.

there are some more



posted on Aug, 19 2005 @ 07:45 AM
link   

Originally posted by chinawhite
no. i dont have time to go over everything. you should do some reading on pre-revolutionary china.

Thats the point, the "people" didnt chose. The Majority of the "people".



and their supporters. landlords traditors of china that spported japan.

numerous books in english and chinese have been written about why the communist won the civil war. and what were the repercussions

Yeah but there where still the "people".



no its communism not communist. there is a difference that clearly you dont know

I know it, there is no difference between comunism and comunist because one supports the other.



posted on Aug, 19 2005 @ 07:50 AM
link   

Originally posted by devilwasp
Thats the point, the "people" didnt chose. The Majority of the "people".


when you say the people elected geogre bush. you dont say geogre bush was elected with 55%




Yeah but there where still the "people".


no they weren't the people. they were enemies of the people. making profits out of the suffering of the people



I know it, there is no difference between comunism and comunist because one supports the other.


communism is a polictical ideology while the other is a supporter of the ideology



posted on Aug, 19 2005 @ 07:50 AM
link   

Originally posted by chinawhite
Copies?? any proof on this. china only produced the russian SA-2 in limited numbers as the HQ-1 then produced the HQ-2 which was a modifled HQ-1 with a New guidence system

Well you copy fighters, only logical to assume you do so with missiles.



because he is a westerner chinese. or BBC british born chinese

So because he is not living in china makes him unreliable?



your laws

??????My laws of physiscs???
What???





the war will end so quick they wont

So said montgomery in operation market garden..



WW2, korean war, vietnam war. falklands. ring any bells

Over 2 decades ago....
BTW, they sunk military ships, not civilian ones.



task force right next to chians coast with thousands of Anti-ship missiles in range

Not really, there is this whole thing called the sea.



posted on Aug, 19 2005 @ 07:51 AM
link   

Originally posted by chinawhite
and about americans bases.

they were asked to leave the subic bay in philippines and more recently asked to leave their middle eastern base in uzbekistan.

there are some more
Since when does asking ammount to kicking out?



posted on Aug, 19 2005 @ 07:52 AM
link   

Originally posted by devilwasp
Yes I did call one person an idiot, but that was after YOU insulted both pilots from france and germany.
Also I said he was thinking idioticly because he was, I never once called him nor implied he was one.
If he WAS one he wouldnt come up with the decent arguments he has given in not just this threat.


i did not insult anyone. franch and german airforces dont conduct long endurance flights but you still claim they do because they are a western force? sounds weird



posted on Aug, 19 2005 @ 07:54 AM
link   

Originally posted by chinawhite
when you say the people elected geogre bush. you dont say geogre bush was elected with 55%

Dont tangent, stay on subject.
I also am unhappy about the GWB case.



no they weren't the people. they were enemies of the people. making profits out of the suffering of the people

Yeah, but how do you define "the people"?



communism is a polictical ideology while the other is a supporter of the ideology

Yeah one supports the other.
Communism supports the comunist and the comunist supports comunism.



posted on Aug, 19 2005 @ 07:55 AM
link   

Originally posted by chinawhite
i did not insult anyone. franch and german airforces dont conduct long endurance flights but you still claim they do because they are a western force? sounds weird

You said they were not well trained.
THAT is an insult.
French and german airforces do train to do that, have you any proof otherwise?



posted on Aug, 19 2005 @ 07:55 AM
link   

Originally posted by devilwasp

Well you copy fighters, only logical to assume you do so with missiles.


thats the problem you assume everything. dont back up your s claims with anything.

you still havent given any edvidence about german or franch long endurance training?



So because he is not living in china makes him unreliable?


because it bias his views. educated at a british university





So said montgomery in operation market garden..


whats this have to do with taiwan?. this is 6 decades seperating WW2 and the present




Over 2 decades ago....
BTW, they sunk military ships, not civilian ones.


well they continued to starve



Not really, there is this whole thing called the sea.


not when your trying to give supplies 10miles off chinas coast. if it was the sea. its very small



posted on Aug, 19 2005 @ 07:57 AM
link   

Originally posted by devilwasp
no they weren't the people. they were enemies of the people. making profits out of the suffering of the people


the peasants.



Yeah one supports the other.
Communism supports the comunist and the comunist supports comunism.


yes but you said communist dont exist. theres difference between what you said



posted on Aug, 19 2005 @ 07:59 AM
link   

Originally posted by devilwasp
You said they were not well trained.
THAT is an insult.
French and german airforces do train to do that, have you any proof otherwise?


no i didn't.
X1000

i said they were not trained in long endurance flights. i have never once said they were inferious or lesser trained.

i dont need proof its common sense. a airforce that dont conduct long distance flights wouldn't train for them

[edit on 19-8-2005 by chinawhite]



posted on Aug, 19 2005 @ 08:01 AM
link   

Originally posted by devilwasp
Since when does asking ammount to kicking out?


since they are leaving



posted on Aug, 19 2005 @ 08:02 AM
link   

Originally posted by chinawhite
thats the problem you assume everything. dont back up your s claims with anything.

Sino and physics are.


you still havent given any edvidence about german or franch long endurance training?

They have the kit, would be stupid not to be able to do it.



because it bias his views. educated at a british university

Oh wow, a british university really makes him biased.
Mabye I should call you biased since you are chinese?




whats this have to do with taiwan?. this is 6 decades seperating WW2 and the present

Montgomery made the mistake of underestimateing the enemy...It doesnt matter how long the time is , people keep makeing those mistakes.



well they continued to starve

Who the argentinians?



not when your trying to give supplies 10miles off chinas coast. if it was the sea. its very small

Why do you think they would send the carriers into the straights?



posted on Aug, 19 2005 @ 08:04 AM
link   

Originally posted by chinawhite
the peasants.

Ah so you only count "peasanst" as people, is that how mass murder is allowed to be commited?



yes but you said communist dont exist. theres difference between what you said

Good point, well argued.



posted on Aug, 19 2005 @ 08:05 AM
link   

Originally posted by chinawhite
no i didn't.
X1000

Yes you did, + 1 more time than you can.


i said they were not trained in long endurance flights. i have never once said they were inferious or lesser trained.

Ah but that in itself calls them less trained.


i dont need proof its common sense. a airforce that dont conduct long distance flights wouldn't train for them
[edit on 19-8-2005 by chinawhite]

How do they not conduct long distance flights?

Ps, since when does leaving on your own free will mean getting booted out?

[edit on 26/02/2005 by devilwasp]



new topics

top topics



 
1
<< 118  119  120    122  123  124 >>

log in

join