It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by devilwasp
Yes it is my error, I apologise and can make no exscuse of the matter.
I have looked over what units can reach it at a moments notice and only the philipenes can do so.
As I said, my mistake.
Quite shockingly I havent found any B-52's in forign posetion, I am still looking up european "bombers" but there isnt really any I can see that match the B-52.
If however they where given 24 hours the situation will be diffrent.
Originally posted by chinawhite
Japan-good US ally but also chinas largest trade partner.
South korea-good US ally but chinas the largest export destination. +good cultrul links
Thailand-heres a link
www.iuj.ac.jp...
Australia will stay out/neatural according to comments by alexander downer.
Philippines-Kicked america out of naval base
Originally posted by HowlrunnerIV
Yes, but who is Japan's largest trade partner?
Has been a US ally since the Vietnam war days. In the '70s and '80s it was practically a direct client state.
Given the current status of the US/Aus alliance, do you really think we'll deny them our runways and harbours? Plus we're the only airforce in the world with F1-11s. Still just about the world's best tactical bomb platform after the B2 and with the range to operate all the way to China.
And that doesn't take into account the current US bases in Central Asia: Kyrgyzstan, Uzbekistan (soon to be no more) and Afghanistan, all can be supplied from Europe or the Chagos archipeligo.
Originally posted by chinawhite
Originally posted by HowlrunnerIV
Yes, but who is Japan's largest trade partner?
china
Has been a US ally since the Vietnam war days. In the '70s and '80s it was practically a direct client state.
so? anything in the 90s?
Given the current status of the US/Aus alliance, do you really think we'll deny them our runways and harbours? Plus we're the only airforce in the world with F1-11s. Still just about the world's best tactical bomb platform after the B2 and with the range to operate all the way to China.
its comments from out foriegn misiter. bring come sources or something that says otherwise. not something like "look at our past relations" or "we have a alliance"
And that doesn't take into account the current US bases in Central Asia: Kyrgyzstan, Uzbekistan (soon to be no more) and Afghanistan, all can be supplied from Europe or the Chagos archipeligo.
like you said soon to be no more.
Originally posted by HowlrunnerIV
When did China overtake the US as Japan's largest trading partner. Not disputing, just asking.
Condi Rice visiting them a couple of months ago? Sorry, that's 21st century.
i mean relations now. any leader can visit a country
There's nothing past about our deployments to Afghanistan and Iraq or Johnny's visit to Washington or George's visit to Canberra. Our alliance with the US is the strongest it's been for 20 years when Bob Hawke was PM. The strongest since 1965 when we sent troops to Vietnam. We've put men in harm's way at their request. Like it or not Oz is the third partner in George's War on Terror. Alexander Downer saying we won't get involved does not preclude the US using its defence facilities in Oz, and as I said, do you really think we would prevent them using Australian defence facilities if the PRC attacked the RoC and the US went to Taiwan's aid? If George asked for it Johnny would give it, and probably at a knock-down price, if not free. Remember, Australia has always confronted "communist" aggression (Korea, Malayan emergency and VN) and defended democracy (Indonesian confrontation, Cambodia, ETimor) and will continue to do so. You need our $25 billion worth of natural gas, we can always find another buyer if we have to.
thats your opinion. i do think that the US might use asutralian airbases, but i doubt australian troops or aircraft will get involed in any of the fighting
Johnny doesn't own the country he represents us. we have to pass this vote in parliment first.
Australias deployments to afganistan and iraq are nothing. these countries do not do any sizable amount of trade with australia. they were deployed because of australias fear of terrorism not because america asked us to.
Originally posted by chinawhite
as i said before. no western airforce (except the US) can reach chinese soil with any meaninful planes
Originally posted by chinawhite
as i said before. no western airforce (except the US) can reach chinese soil with any meaninful planes
how would it be any different.? i never knew that european airforces can leave to fight a war in asia in 24 hours
Originally posted by devilwasp
That is not true.
The RAF can fly off the RN carriers, and out of afgahnistan.
They can, and would.
We have units in iraq and afgahnistan.
Originally posted by Daedalus3
I think you should rephrase as no western airforce who has hostile intentions towards china (except for the US) can reach chinese soil..
Because the French and british..Maybe even the Germans can fly across Khazakistan and be over Xinjiang..
Are those Vulcans still in service??
Originally posted by chinawhite
do you relaize how far afganistan is from taiwan. and how much chinese fighters are stationed in their flight path?
and harriers?
how much units?
Originally posted by devilwasp
Dont need to hit taiwan to annoy the enemy.
RN carriers can fly RAF harriers off it
Go look for yourself.
Originally posted by chinawhite
where then?
not that much harriers.
i already know. its a small number
Originally posted by devilwasp
Anywhere in northern china, or simply redeploy to phillipenes.
Yes that much harriers, EVERY harrier can.
duties in Iraq and Afghanstan:
Tornado GR4 and Harrier GR7A attack aircraft
VC10 tanker aircraft
Puma and Merlin support helicopters
Hercules and BAE 125 transports
Nimrod maritme patrol aircraft
Two RAF Regiment squadrons and Force Protection Wing HQ
The following Tactical Wings: Communications, Supply, Medical and Provost (Security)
Plus other support personnel including: bomb disposal, airfield maintenance, air traffic, air movements, meteorological and transportation
Small aye?
Originally posted by devilwasp
Anywhere in northern china, or simply redeploy to phillipenes.
Originally posted by chinawhite
from where
how long did it take to deploy those harriers to the falklands. wasn't a british carrier retiring?
do you know how long it took for the allied forces to deploy their airforces to iraq in the first gulf war. that was the iraqi airforce. they had the added bonus of being close to europe and a america ally.
check the ranges of those planes and check which countries they have to go over and how much time they have to refuel. and how much tankers they have to use to get there
Originally posted by Odium
You all seem to assume these Nations would allow the American Air force and every other Air Force to fly over their land. You don't think the leaders will be thinking; "What if America (Et al) fail? What will then happen to us from the Chinese as punishment?"
Originally posted by Odium
You all seem to assume these Nations would allow the American Air force and every other Air Force to fly over their land. You don't think the leaders will be thinking; "What if America (Et al) fail? What will then happen to us from the Chinese as punishment?"
Originally posted by devilwasp
Afgahnistan, korea...
The harriers there could only be launched from the carriers due to the low land mass in the area, BUT taiwan is not like that.
One is retireing, but that is of no consequence.
"Close" ? Compared to what china?
The added advantage of our aircraft being able to deploy since they are already nearby.
Get to where?.
Thing is though, could china HOLD taiwan from the US and its allies?
I doubt it, US marines are not far away and a strike force could destroy any oposition.
Originally posted by chinawhite
Originally posted by devilwasp
Anywhere in northern china, or simply redeploy to phillipenes.
and the phillipines will let you