It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by lostviking
reply to post by thegoodearth
What BOA is doing is illegal. They are now demonstrating bad faith in misapplying payments. Document everything, and go see an attorney immediately that provides free consultations. Usually a few letters from an attorney is all it takes to stop BOA from doing this type of thing.
Certified Mail # 7009 **** 0003 #### 0741 March 12, 2010
Chase Home Finance LLC
3415 Vision Drive
Columbus, Ohio 43219-6009
Tim Pawlenty - Governor- Certified Mail # 7009 #### 0003 **** 0000
STATE OF MINNESOTA
130 State Capitol
75 Rev. Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd
St.Paul, Minnesota republic, 55155
Regarding: CHASE Statement dated March 1, 2010
addressed to: JOHN HENRY DOE, 1234 47th Ave.N., Somewhere, Minnesota, 55###-0000
Reference: Account Number 1234567890
I am in receipt of the statement detailed in the above "Regarding". In looking through the documents Chase Home Finance sent Me, I did not find a Chase Home Finance check or money order enclosed.
This correspondence for Chase Home Finance, through Power of Attorney in Fact (see attached) is a good faith
attempt on My part in which I seek My Remedy. Please note My Acceptance for Value for Chase Home Finance’s unsolicited offer/presentment, and also note that I am Exempt from Levy.
Chase Home Finance, by virtue through its position, is a Constitutor (1) of government, and as such Chase Home Finance is the Holder of the Principal Obligation by Public Policy. In other words, Chase Home Finance holds My Remedy. Under Public Policy, no contract can be made requiring Me to PAY in anything or form.
(See attached HJR 192, June 5, 1933)
By virtue of Chase Home Finance holding Me, or attempting by holding Me, substance, is Chase Home Finance
requiring Me, by Court Order, threat, force of arms, or forced incarceration for entering into a contract?
By violating Public Policy, is Chase Home Finance attempting, by inducing or coercing Me into accepting by
transfer, the Primary Obligation by forcing Me for "PAYING" either with Federal Reserve Notes, foreclosure, incarceration, probation, community service, or a combination of any or all the above?
I am taking this opportunity by making Myself perfectly clear with full disclosure and no mis-understanding, clean hands and good faith. I will not accept the transfer of the Principal Obligation from Chase Home Finance for Me.
Please take My Acceptance for Value of Chase Home Finance's presentment and adjust My account. If you choose not to do so, please remit the above stated amount on Chase Home Finance's check or money order for My endorsement and I will adjust the account for Chase Home Finance.
If you have any further questions, please contact me in writing to make sure We have no mis-understandings and all ledgering is handled appropriately.
Thank you very much. I look forward to Chase Home Finance's response by Public Policy Truth in Lending within three (3) days from Chase Home Finance's receipt by Certified Mail. Should Chase Home Finance choose to respond or not respond , in three (3) days, by Power of Attorney in Fact, there is no longer permission by consent or assent for any demand of payment being ordered or levied against Me. Until then I remain, Very truly yours,
JOHN HENRY DOE, GRANTOR
SECURED PARTY SIGNATURE
_____________________________________
John-Henry: Doe, Agent
Power of Attorney in Fact, With the Autograph
Attachments: HJR-192, UCC 3-419, Power of Attorney in Fact, Acceptance for Value for the Above Regarding
(1) “Constitutor – He/she who promised by a simple pact to pay the debt of another; and this is always a principal obligation.” Bouvier’s Law Dictionary, 1856; also found in Black’s Law Dictionary.
NOTICE
PROPERTY TAX EXEMPTION
___ day of March, 2010
James Atchison, County Assessor
Minneapolis
A-2103 Government Center
300 South 6th Street
Minneapolis, MN 55487
Dear Mr. Atchison:
I am requesting to have my property removed from the property tax rolls for the following reasons:
1. 42 USC 1982 Property rights of citizens
2. 42 USC 1441 Congressional Declaration of National Housing Policy
3. 18 USC 241 Conspiracy Against Rights
4. 18 USC 242 Deprivation of rights Under Color of Law
5. Article 1 Section 1, Bill of Rights, Minnesota State Constitution
6. UCC-1 filing number 12345678901
7. UCC-3 filing number 10987654321
With explicit reservation of all my rights and without prejudice, per U.C.C. 1-207, 1-308
Sincerely,
John-Henry: Doe, Agent
c/o non-Domestic, Foreign mail near;
1234 47th Avenue N.
Somewhere, Minnesota republic
Zip code exempt (DMM 122.32), As Amended
Without the U.S.
Included; Power of Attorney in Fact
Zip Code Exemption
Originally posted by StlSteve
reply to post by Daughter2
I don't get your point. You start with a $1,800 mortgage payment, and it's reduced to $1,200 as a result of the (HAMP) loan modification. How is this bad?