It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Update from "The Agency" #8: Look Out for Flying Vs and "Fireworks"

page: 1
1
<<   2 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Nov, 29 2010 @ 05:39 PM
link   
Hello, ATS.

Most of you are familiar with the original message from "The Agency" as they like to be called. It's unfortunate that so many people have become polarized about The Agency on this forum, however, I do want to show you all the most recent update (from November 27 2010).

I've been keeping up with their website, and according to the website they have made many attempts to demonstrate to their viewers that they are who they say they are. These attempts, however, have always had a specific date attached to them. I don't know why they would be so naive as to think that the numerous enemies they claim to have wouldn't discover these dates and attempt to thwart The Agency, but we are all naive in some ways. Anyhow, in this update, they have finally promised a signal which does not have a very specific date attached to it. This means that if they really exist, then this is the most likely prediction of theirs to come true.

The Prediction:



We believe that we are capable of performing the following without loss of life, and without bending any rules too greatly. During the rest of this year, we will send fleets of drones over North America up to four times. North America is a large place, and we feel confident that if we do not give an exact date, and if we tell you what to look for, we will be able to prove to you that we are "The Agency" people in the know. We will form V shaped patterns with the drones, in all cases, and we will also provide you with a demonstration of our firepower. Time is running short, so we will endeavour to complete this sooner rather than later. So, if you see V's and fireworks: that is us!


This update was posted on November 27, so this is about a month's window during which we should see 4 waves of drones appearing in V formations with "fireworks" all over North America.

Keep your eyes open and lets be on the lookout for a display. Hoax or not I find this fascinating, especially since all they seem to care about right now is convincing people that they are real.

Edit: Apparently, if I cite source URL I get censored. The ATS powers do not seem to trust this source. I propose that there is not enough evidence yet to make a judgment. Nevertheless, this thread can get whacked if that is its fate.

P.S. There are a couple of very interesting things mentioned about Disclosure in this update.

P.P.S. They also promise to show up in UFO displays on the Burnham Harbor Webcam.
edit on 29-11-2010 by PriamsPride because: (no reason given)

edit on 29-11-2010 by PriamsPride because: (no reason given)




posted on Nov, 29 2010 @ 05:48 PM
link   
You know geese fly in a V shape...I think the "Agency" is someone trying to get people to send in pics of high flying geese, and claim they are drones. Do I even have to tell you what people are going to take pics of that will look like fireworks?...

In other words we are looking for things flying in a V pattern and fireworks, both are things everyone in N. America are going to see...no matter what.

Edit: Also we are suppose to watch a webcam for a ufo showing? Why can't we watch the area the webcam is pointed at instead, with real cameras and video devices, not some low definition webcam?
edit on 29-11-2010 by Killface because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 29 2010 @ 05:51 PM
link   
Naive you say? What is naive is the fact you'd think anyone would believe one word of this post. There is no actual date set so it must be true?..lol..um..naive you say? Hahahaha.HHAHAHAHAHHHAHAAHHAAA..naive enough for you?



posted on Nov, 29 2010 @ 06:00 PM
link   
Go to Vonheltons you tube channel
and check out his dealings with "the agency"
His reaction pretty much says it all.

The BrainGarden.



posted on Nov, 29 2010 @ 06:00 PM
link   
oh dear god are they still carrying on with this crap?? firstly they have mentioned on many occasions that they are going to show themselves and NEVER have.

when they mentioned a green comet and that we were to stay indoors for three days, the day b4 that green comet that everyone knew about was to pass us by i knew then this was a hoax.

i wouldnt waste any of your time waiting for a sign from this retard.



posted on Nov, 29 2010 @ 06:36 PM
link   
The whole thing is absolute bollocks. Go read the forum over there and you'll see that the guy who's behind it all "fesses up", and yet there are still people who believe the fiction.

As I've said before, people want to believe in the prophet far more than they want to believe in the prophecy.



posted on Nov, 29 2010 @ 07:45 PM
link   
Thank you for your responses.

I do not adopt the belief/disbelief duality. Rather, I simply assess data as I see it and then decide whether the data is worth continued observance.

Killface, I assumed the webcam was recommended because it has a larger audience than the physical location. I certainly don't have the means to observe the harbor myself.

Nebulous, remember that strawmen are built out of extreme construals found in your post. I recommend great care in using such extreme descriptions of ideas, regardless of whether they are ideas you accept or reject. I, for example, do not believe that flying Vs alone will demonstrate anything. Whether weight should be given to a signal all depends on the intensity and context of that signal.

adjensen, that explains why I couldn't access the forum the one time I tried to. I wonder why someone would continue to play with a self-admitted hoax...

Thank you all for clearing this one up.
edit on 29-11-2010 by PriamsPride because: whimsy



posted on Nov, 29 2010 @ 10:37 PM
link   
reply to post by PriamsPride
 


Yeah but the wording is iffy, I mean, if I was going to do a UFO display over Bismark, S.D. I would say;"Watch Bismark." Not,"Watch the Bismark webcam."

I don't see why they would specify the exact webcam, unless that is the only method they want you to watch.



posted on Nov, 29 2010 @ 11:26 PM
link   
I've explored the forum and I do not see any admittance that the Agency is a hoax, so I will continue to withhold judgment.

Killface, I don't know if you've looked at the webcam, but it's a very interactive camera. I gather that the reason this webcam was singled out is because it has a wide range of vision and can be moved by internet users. This makes it very easy to take screen shots and and zoom in on activity. According to the Agency, they want a larger audience, so they are focusing on the harbor because it has a good webcam that watches it 24-7. This seems to me a good reason to specify the webcam rather than just the harbor. After all, I certainly didn't know about the webcam until the Update.



posted on Nov, 30 2010 @ 07:16 AM
link   

Originally posted by Killface
reply to post by PriamsPride
 


Yeah but the wording is iffy, I mean, if I was going to do a UFO display over Bismark, S.D. I would say;"Watch Bismark." Not,"Watch the Bismark webcam."


Did they actually say that? Because Bismarck isn't spelled that way, and it's in North Dakota, not South Dakota, lol.


Originally posted by PriamsPride
I've explored the forum and I do not see any admittance that the Agency is a hoax, so I will continue to withhold judgment.


Here you go: www.portalreport.co.cc...

If, after reading that, you want to conclude that this guy isn't just making up all this stuff (or playing along with those who are) to drive traffic to his own site (as well as the portal one,) feel free, but the next time you look in the mirror, see if the word "chump" isn't written on your forehead, because that's how you're being played.

This thing was ludicrous when it began, and as claim after claim has been for naught, the only credibility that this thing has lies in the hearts of those who want to believe it, regardless of anything factual that shows it to be false. Again, wanting to believe in the prophet so bad that you'll accept bad prophecy after bad prophecy and the lame excuses which follow each failure.
edit on 30-11-2010 by adjensen because: around != along



posted on Nov, 30 2010 @ 07:57 AM
link   
One question.....

Who the flock is this "Agency"? Is there any more information on this alone?

Cuhail


ETA- I followed the link here....and the link there....and another link. And still have no idea who "Agency" is, but, I'm convinced it's ONE guy with a mental stability issue. Just sayin'.


edit on 11/30/2010 by Cuhail because: to add words



posted on Nov, 30 2010 @ 03:05 PM
link   
I am gonna be honest, I was less than sober when I posted that and never cared to learn much about the Dakota's ha. I hope I didn't offend any Bismarckians? But I stand by what I said, it just sounds odd to me, I would understand suggesting the webcam but telling the people in the area to watch.

And the webcam is a side point anyway, I can't wait to see all the pics of geese and ...well, fireworks.



posted on Dec, 1 2010 @ 02:34 AM
link   
adjensen, I understand where you are coming from, but I believe that there are genuine people in this world. I judge who these people are not by my fears concerning the various ways I may be deceived, but by my gut judgment based upon very minute aspects of any given situation. I have read that statement and I think the admin is being honest.

Yes, honest people exist in this world. Yes, they often end up in scandalous situations in which many people refuse to believe them, even though they are being honest.

Allowing your fears to direct your judgment will quickly isolate you from your fellow human beings. Allowing your intuition to guide your actions will draw trustworthy people to you and indicate untrustworthy ones without needing proof of this untrustworthiness.

All of that said, it may well be a hoax. As you can see, this thread has been moved to the hoax forum, because ATS has deemed it a hoax. That is fine. I only posted this thread to inform the interested of a new update.



posted on Dec, 1 2010 @ 02:42 AM
link   
Sorry, but wasn't there supposed to be something in the sky in Chicago as proof of what the "agency" is talking about.

This was supposed to happen I believe on the 14th of November.

I watched the news, and payed close attention on ATS, but didn't see anything about something in the sky's in Chicago.



posted on Dec, 1 2010 @ 02:46 AM
link   
Double Post, Sorry

edit on 1-12-2010 by thewholepicture because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 8 2010 @ 02:20 PM
link   
sorry if im hijacking ur thread but here is another meesage from the agency...

www.davidicke.com...

i cant find the original post on here anymore, you may remember it.

Its regarding a green fireball being seen in the sky before the year is up. and today at around 5.30 the uk is reporting on a green fireball being seen in the sky, theres an ats post about it and its all over twitter.

perhaps someone can start a new thread about it? i would, but cant figure how to do this simple task on ats anymore!!


cheers.



posted on Dec, 8 2010 @ 02:44 PM
link   

Originally posted by doorhand
sorry if im hijacking ur thread but here is another meesage from the agency...

www.davidicke.com...


That isn't "another" message from the Agency, it's the first one. Which was followed up with a claim that the fireball/meteor/whatever would be coming around in October. And then it was deactivated. And then it was destroyed or landed or something.


Its regarding a green fireball being seen in the sky before the year is up. and today at around 5.30 the uk is reporting on a green fireball being seen in the sky, theres an ats post about it and its all over twitter.


So they were only off by, what, two months? How many people are dead in the UK now because they didn't go hide in their homes?



posted on Dec, 8 2010 @ 02:49 PM
link   
reply to post by adjensen
 


im not completely bought into this, but they say a green fireball would be seen by the end of the year, not in october. so that is spot on.

when do you ever see a green fireball? never?

also it didnt mention anything to do with people dying. have a read perhaps



posted on Dec, 8 2010 @ 02:58 PM
link   

Originally posted by doorhand
reply to post by adjensen
 


im not completely bought into this, but they say a green fireball would be seen by the end of the year, not in october. so that is spot on.

when do you ever see a green fireball? never?

also it didnt mention anything to do with people dying. have a read perhaps


Again, you are reading the first of... I don't know, I think that they are up to eight "updates." If you read a little ways down in that thread, you'll find where the rest are, and subsequent posts are what I am taking note of. If you read far enough, you will get to the point where it becomes evident to all but the most hopeful readers, that this is all a hoax to drive traffic to some guy's website.

And, yes, there are green things that are in the sky. Here is one of many



posted on Dec, 8 2010 @ 03:05 PM
link   
reply to post by adjensen
 


ok, thank you for your input.



new topics

top topics



 
1
<<   2 >>

log in

join