It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by SPACEYstranger
What does a book about the holocaust have to do with anything? And why should anyone do you a favor if you dont even know what your talking about? just out of curiosity
Originally posted by Erno86
The only good thing that Hitler did, was to kill himself; though, it would have been much better if he was captured by Allied forces, trialed at Nuremberg then hanged.
The leader of nazi forces during WW2: The only good Hitler, is a dead Hitler: Good and dead.
"I have now seen the famous German leader and also something of the great change he has effected. Whatever one may think of his methods, and they are certainly not those of a parliamentary country, there can be no doubt that he has achieved a marvelous transformation in the spirit of the people, in their attitude towards each other, and in their social and economic outlook. He rightly claimed at Nuremberg that in four years his movement had made a new Germany. It is not the Germany of the first decade that followed the war, broken, dejected and bowed down with a sense of apprehension and impotence. It is now full of hope and confidence, and of a renewed sense of determination to lead its own life without interference from any influence outside its own frontiers. There is for the first time since the war a general sense of security. The people are more cheerful. There is a greater sense of general gaiety of spirit throughout the land. It is a happier Germany. I saw it everywhere, and Englishmen I met during my trip and who knew Germany well were very impressed with the change. One man has accomplished this miracle. He is a born leader of men. A magnetic and dynamic personality with a single-minded purpose, as resolute will and a dauntless heart. He is not merely in name but in fact the national Leader. He has made them safe against potential enemies by whom they were surrounded. He is also securing them against the constant dread of starvation which is one of the most poignant memories of the last years of the War and the first years of the Peace.
Originally posted by SPACEYstranger
reply to post by Regenstorm
Your forgetting that hitler was a liar. Anything he said was a facade. He never honored a treaty. Any political party he supported was a facade, something he could manipulate to reach his ends. Nothing he said is of any value, which is made perfectly clear in his writings and actions
lol @ hitler&JFK. What are you going on about, boy?edit on 1-3-2011 by SPACEYstranger because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Regenstorm
reply to post by Lateralussicksicksick
The VRIL Society.
It really exists.
Originally posted by tom502
Most everything we have been told about him is zionist propaganda.
The Nazi Era - The Protocols Of Zion
Nazi party ideologue Alfred Rosenberg introduced Hitler to the Protocols during the early 1920s, as Hitler was developing his worldview. Hitler referred to the Protocols in some of his early political speeches, and, throughout his career, he exploited the myth that "Jewish-Bolshevists" were conspiring to control the world.
During the 1920s and 1930s, The Protocols of the Elders of Zion played an important part in the Nazis' propaganda arsenal. The Nazi party published at least 23 editions of the Protocols between 1919 and 1939. Following the Nazis' seizure of power in 1933, some schools used the Protocols to indoctrinate students.
www.ushmm.org...
Hitler wasn't racist either, no more than any other monoracial nation
I also have never seen any proof he wanted to take over the world, that was Marxist communism's goal.
Originally posted by curious7
his intentions initially were good when he first got into politics
His antics during the war and actions against members of society are rightly discussed as being inherently evil and not to be applauded but to say he was totally bad throughout his entire life is just as wrong. It's like people assuming the word Nazi and the symbol of it are evil without first looking into the origins.
The Nazi party were a "for the people" political party and the symbol is an old religious icon.