posted on Nov, 29 2010 @ 12:54 AM
Hey folks, It's my first thread, so please go easy on me.
I was browsing through the Wikileaks disappointment today when I happened across a statement that made my jaw hit the floor:
"The 1946 UN convention on privileges and immunities states: ‘The premises of the United Nations shall be inviolable. The property and assets of the
United Nations, wherever located and by whomsoever held, shall be immune from search, requisition, confiscation, expropriation and any other form of
interference, whether by executive, administrative, judicial or legislative action."
Inviolable...period. You may not proceed against the UN in a court of law, or it's property, or assets.
You might want to read the definition of 'person' in Black's Law...and you will find that this SEEMINGLY extends to UN 'PERSONnel'.
I am aghast, and see the UN in a whole different light.
edit on 29/11/2010 by quietone77 because: Bad link