Indeed that's an interesting supposition - it's one possible explanation I suppose, and I see where your comming from, my reservation would be that it
ignores the so called weak force fo gravity or the other half of the equation essentially.
This whole equilibrium universe - two counteracting forces theory of everything - requires a paradigm shift away from Einsteins relativity theorem -
which attempts to explain everything within near earth space in the expansive side of the equation.
As you saw with Tom Beardens contribution, his electromagnetic investigations attempts to account for the less observable negatropic / weak force or
contractive side of the equation with his "source charge reasoning" which makes a lot of sense one you abandon Einstein and Maxwell, Heaviside,
Lorentze et al and their relativisitic reasoning.
There are ONLY two forces in the universe -and they are in a state of equilibrium, ones the expansiveand one the contractive.
I thought i might demonstrate this in a 3d visual form for you with explanation sio that it sinks in easier - so please bare with me - before we
attack M = Δ T.
M = Δ T will show te equality f allthe energy states of matter - as part of this whole universe in equilibrium explanation in a nummerical and
mathematic manner - but the3D geometry explanation of the two forces is more visual and makes understanding much easier.
Remind me I need to address what time is!
We are getting there tho.
So,
Shall we look at the contractive 'gravity' (negative) force of this universe?
. = a point in space, but it does not exist (is not real or doesn't have reality) because it does not contain volume!.
...... = series of points in space making a line, but does not exist (is not real or doesn't have reality) because it does not contain volume!.
= a triangular plane, but it does not exist (is not real or doesn't
have reality) because while it does have area - it does not contain volume!.
= a tetrahedron, made up of 4 triangular planes, and IT exists(has
reality) because IT encloses volume!
Whats interesting about this fractal tetrahedron, is that - it is the ONLY shape, that exists, that can contain the LEAST possible volume, with the
least possible surface area!
This is why the nature of the gravitational or negative force within the universe is a fractal tetrahedron!.
Conversely, if we wish to enclose as MUCH possible volume, with the least possible surface area? (for the expansive force within our universe)....we
get?
And in our observable expansive force universe, the shapes we most observe with our planets and suns etc is?
Yes - spherical!
We now understand the expansive spherical forces of this universe reasonably well (allowing for Einsteins relativity error explained above) BUT our
knowledge of the contractive (gravitic) force of this universe (what happens INSIDE the event horizon of a black hole) is sadly lacking!
The nature of the contractive/gravitic force in its tetrahedral form is now just starting to be understood, and i believe / suspect that eventually
those good scientists working at CERN on the Large Hadron Collider will eventually come to understand the fractal tetrahedral nature of this gravitic
/ contractive force within the universe.
This negative force - has the ability to alter the electron shell behavior of elements of our periodic table - including those we rely upon for
splitting the atom (atomic power generation and atomic fission weapons) to the point that -its weaponization and use could in fact "defuse" ICBM's
with nuclear warheads in flight, not to mention leaving Nuclear powered submarines and air craft carriers dead in the water with reactors that no
longer react - because the fundamental properties of their cores can be altered at will!.
It's been documented many times, in "interactions with UFO's" where their anti gravity (and anti matter) drives, can and do alter the electron shell
properties & hence valence properties, of material used to make magnets and batteries and generators etc that power most of our vehicles and air craft
etc etc. Even batteries can and are made to become inert, by the application of this technology...
It is the method by which mans plans for a nuclear holocaust World War 3 to destroy the planet will be thwarted, bye those advanced entities here to
help ensure our survival as a species, will "defuse" the situation when required to do so, for survival of our species reasons, - assuming we do NOT
wake up to ourselves by then.
Back to the tetrahedral nature of the gravitic force.
metaphilm.com...&t=1" target='_blank' class='tabOff'/>
It is quite possible to insert two triangles into a circle just as the depicted mogen david above depicts! (link problem - I wonder why that doesn't
render - it shoud!)
Similarly,
It is also possible to fit two tetrahedrons in 3D inside a sphere, as long as the two opposite tetradehdrons are phase shifted at 120 degrees to one
another!.
When one does this - one gets a few things - firstly the crystalline form of elements like carbon when combined to make diamonds etc
One also gets something else.
One gets an apex that intersects the surface of the sphere at the TRUE (not magnetic) north and south poles, as well as 6 base plane apex points that
ALSO intersect the surface of the sphere, 3 at a position equivalent with latitude 19 degrees 47 minutes north of the equator and a similar position
south of the equator also at 19 degrees 47 minutes (but phase shifted 90 degrees from the longitudes of their northern counterparts)!
These are the 8 points on the surface of the earth (6 @ 19deg 47min N&S of equator + 1 each at True North and True South) - where the contractive
(negative) gravitic force of the universe converge to equalise the expansive force of the universe, by cycling BACK to the singularity (black hole)
that is the center of our earth!
This is likewise how the same energy force cycles back to the mini black holes (singularities) that form the center of atoms at that level of
reality.
When we come to understand this negative force we will have escape from gravity (anti gravity), which is the exact opposite of that force I already
described in my post above in an angular torque momentum force etc etc
When this is "reversed" - one gets the expansive force (anti gravity).
It is easily achieved by just reversing the spin and angular torque momentum force of this earth, with any similarly magnetized mass element, spun in
the opposite direction to that of the earths spin and traveling at the opposite angular torque corkscrew momentum force to the earth!
The relationship between the mass used and the mass of the earth will be the factor of anti-gravity force achieved.
It is all so very simple when you think i about it.
Strangely - just about EVERY "alien crop circle" ever depicted on earth so far (with just a couple of special exceptions) depict a fractal tetrahedral
diagram of one form or another, as tho they are trying to tell us something! (No shiate Sherlock)!
The only exceptions were those couple of binary code crop circles that appeared alongside the chilbotin radio telescope in I think from memory 1999 &
2000 from which the "aricebo message" was transmitted into space in search of other life forms in 1972? (Remember Google is your friend, you can
search these crop circles and read their decoding for yourselves).
There is no question that we here on Earth are under the direct influence of a particular alien entity at this point in time.
The question of course - is 'WHICH" particular alien entity, is this the same entity that created us (answer = NO!) or is it the much prophesied 'anti
christ' malevolent alien entity, that creates on earth a situation of positive desire for contact by the worlds populace - mistakling this particular
'anti christ' for our creator?
If one decodes the aricebo / chilboltin crop circles "message" from our genetic creator entities - the warnings quite clear that - those entity's NOW
affecting our situation here on earth, to create a political desire within the population for direct intervention by an entity!
It would seem revelations will pan out just as it says - with an eventual war of the worlds - between the soon to be visible alien entities now around
our planet, and our actual creator alien entities that will arrive in due course to route the current arrivals, and 'rescue us' to a New Earth, a new
Garden of Eden, a new City of Jerusalem in the Heavens, in due course.
Sadly not before 2/3rds of this population on earth are fooled by the anti christ alien entity now manifesting in our reality plane and lose their
chance at immortality as a result.
Some will be much more easily fooled than others sadly.
But I've drifted away from where we need to go next - the angular torque momentumof time and we still need to look at
M = Δ T
The image of the solar system with its planetary orbits is deceptive - its 2 dimensional.
What in fact earth does is spin on itsaxis while it orbits the sun as the sun isitself orbiting the univese once every 26000 odd years (an equinoctial
precession great year, andthe earths orbiit is really aspiral with the sun at the center...as depicted above.
This is where the angular torque momentum comes in "time".
As I think I'v already maybe said - you could crunch the big numbers and get the earthsmass and its orbital velocity and angular torque momentum
figures andcalculate the energy of Time domain.
Tom Beardens already done that for us and as he showed its the value of c ^2 or 3 x 10^8 mps squared.
3 x 10^8 squared is 9 x 10^16 mps (roughly - your earlier figure was more accurate but thats close enough for our purposes in this exercise).
So each second of time contains about the compressed energy of about 9 x 10^16 joules per second or thereabouts.
Heres where my own M = Δ T theorem comes nto its own, because it shows us just the exact energy relationship that I suggested exists!
Here is where we depart a little from the 3 previous quoted authors & onto the findings of myself with regard to relationships between Mass and Time
domain – in terms of energy potentials.
The question I found myself asking was fundamentally this:-
In the larger world context, -( rather than what might also equally apply in spatial circuits at the atomic & sub atomic level), what exactly can we
learn, at the macroscopic level, about this domain of Time as a form of energy (if anything)?
The preceding 3 authors, and many great scientists before them - have all said much about Time as have a great many philosophers before them – so I
thought it might at this point be handy to summarize a few of the attributable quotes about what time is and isn’t into a brief list to “jog our
memories” and get us all back onto the same page again in our collective thinking about time generally.
To first order, time seems to have the same energy density as mass does.
So time is actually highly compressed energy.
It turns out that all 3-space energy comes from the time domain anyway, being time converted into 3-space energy. And it also returns from 3-space
back to the time domain, in an ongoing "circulation" in 4-space.
Time, as such, in a continuum of such magnitude is equally relative!
'Time' Is NOT an absolute dimension in reality. The ONLY absolute is energy.
Time is a ratio of changes in energy density.
Time on an atom passes much faster than time at the earth level does.
I found in Tom Bearden’s writings an interesting finding that intrigued me a lot.
Tom states this in the first quote about time above, i.e. To first order, time seems to have the same energy density as mass does. And I’ve seen him
express this phenomenon as an equation not unlike A Einstein’s as:-
E = Δ TC^2
Or expressed as “Energy Equals Change in Time, times the universal constant C (speed of light) squared.
It occurred to me that perhaps we COULD learn something valuable about Time – by comparing (resolving) the two equations for a Time & Mass
relationship, as follows:-
If
E = MC^2 (Einstein)
& also
E = Δ TC^2 (Bearden)
Then it necessarily follows that :-
MC^2 = Δ TC^2
Further multiplying each side of the equation by 1/C^2 leaves
M = Δ T
Or it can just be expressed simply as
Mass equals Change in Time.
In energy terms – we are being told exactly what Tom Bearden and Stan Deyo said all those years ago.
There is as much energy trapped or compressed within the time domain as there is within Mass (think the atom & splitting thereof – or nuclear
explosions – a whale of a lot of energy in anyones terms).
Tom Bearden even tells us how much potential energy is available in just one second as 9 x 10 ^ 16 joules of energy.
Marshall Smith in his 2 articles above about Einstein’s error summarizes this for us very neatly when he wrote:-
If Einstein had only used his own "alpha" as the basis for solving the M-M Experiment, instead of the Lorentz Transform in his Relativity paper, he
would have found that all the forces of nature;
the nuclear,
electric,
magnetic,
and
gravitational forces,
were all simply variations of the same force.
Again we find this very concept reinforced by Stan Deyo in his statement:-
'Time' Is NOT an absolute dimension in reality. The ONLY absolute is energy.
Here we find ourselves then, asking a simple and logical question, even though we know that the answer basically is just another form of energy –
“just what the heck is TIME?”.
Herein lies a big part of the problem, because so few understand what time really is and how it is measured.
Now a great many will tell you all about chronometers and clocks and the measurement of time and nuclear clocks and so on….
Problem is – we now know that Time is an energy force, equally as powerful as nuclear energy, and clocks etc don’t explain much about that energy
force or make it available to us to convert easily into other forms of energy with which we can do work.
So, let us get this right from the start, just what do clocks measure?
Well – obvious answer is they measure the earths spin about it’s own axis for a full rotation of the earth involving one day and night, and this
takes about 24 hours (*depending where you are on the earth’s surface*).
To make this point – I always like to quote the old stand up comic’s line about the homicide detective in Alaska’s Yukon, who asks his murder
suspect,
“And can you account for your whereabouts on the night in question - of June 15th to December 24th!”
….usually gets a good laugh! ;o)
So – yes Time as MOST people understand it, is all about clocks and days and nights, periods of 24 hours and minutes and seconds etc.
We however – being a little better educated by now should realize that – TIME is an energy force, and just what “force” are we measuring with
the earths’ spin about its own axis?
Yes – We are measuring part of the force of GRAVITY, with our clocks and watches and nuclear clocks etc.
This has NOTHING whatever to do with the potential Energy of the TIME domain!
So – again the simple question, what the heck is TIME and how do we measure it IF watches and clocks etc are actually Gravity meters and have little
if anything to do with TIME?
OK – those of you who are awake – will realize that CALENDARS measure time – because Time is the Earths Passage in an annual elliptical
corkscrew orbit about the sun,
Calendars measure the seasons, which is all about the earths axis tilt in relation to our orbit about the sun where we get two solar equinoxes and two
solar solstices in our annual orbit about the sun….
This is TIME – the earths passage thru space in an annual elliptical corkscrew orbit about the sun, taking 365 & ¼ days (gravity spins about the
earths own axis) to complete, (or thereabouts) combined with the angular torque force of earths cork screw passage thru space orbiting the sun which
is itself orbiting the black hole at the center of our universe at it's event horizon at a velocity of some 48 million miles per second.
And what energy force are we thus talking about for this earthly Time domain?
Believe it or not – it is an angular torque momentum force of kinetic energy potential.
Yes – the earths MASS times the earths Velocity thru space gives us a kinetic energy potential, angular torque momentum force.
This is the Energy Force of the Time Domain for those of us here on the Earth time domain reality!
So - all you need do - is, starting at equation 7 above of Einsteins 21 equation proof equation set for "special relativity" is insert Einsteins very
own Fine structure constant 'h' from Alpha, where HE inserts the universal constant C and then erroneously ascribes the near earth space value of
186000 miles / second.
That shouldn't be too hard for you.
In fact you can do it right here and be the first person on earth to "officially publish" the "grand unification theorem" or GUT that the world has
sought for so many years now.
That very GUT will answer every single one of your questions about Tesla and what he knew, the Philadelphia experiment, and so on.
Not only will it answer your questions? - you will then be able to answer with some authority - other peoples seemingly "interesting" and "mysterious"
questions based on your new understanding of the grand unification theorem.
Remember me, when you give your Nobel prize for Physics acceptance speech!
Ohh Oceans - he says like a mad scientist trying to remindhimself of something important!
I meant to use this one as well.
Do you remember me saying that Deyo suggests the ether of space behaves as an incompressible fluid of varying energy densities?
Lets take a simple 2 dimensional view of this space ether...
Think of theether of space as an invcompressible fluid (water or our oceans).
Think of our light beam of light photons, as me sailing along in my cargoe ship across theocean from say Australia to Japan (I'm actually a ships
master so this is fun for me) you can imagine your own port of departure and arrival - whatever works for you.(Accpulco here I come) LOL
OK.. don't worry theres no solar tea cup tea leaf rafts in this one!.
So hereI am sailing in space(across the ocean)in this incompresible fluid.
Lets say its 10000 nmiles distance to cover and I'mmaking way at 10 knots..
Too easy - simple math says I will get there in 1000 hours at 10 knots!
So why might it take only 900 hours or 1100 hours?
Well 10 knots ismy speed thru the water - not necessarily my speed over ground (across the ocean floor if you like).
If I encounter a current thats against me, or wind waves - i might be making 10 knots thru the water but only 9 knots over ground - so it might take
me more than the simple 1000 hours calculation toget to japan(acupulco whatever).
Similary if the wind waves andcurrent are behind me or travelling in the samne dorection i might be making 10 knots thru the water but actually 11
knots over ground so get to japan in only 900 hours!
If you think of the ether of space as an incompressible fluid (water) with varying energy densitys (currents, winds, waves, etc) THEN - you can
understand that the speed of light thu that varyng energy density ether of space might travel at faster or slower than the stated value of c (3 x
10^8mps).
So lightspeed is then a variable - NOT a constant as Einstein assumed.
In fact the speed of light is infinite - and as i've shown before that is the ONLY value for speed of light that makes Einsteins e = mc^2 work!
The particular energy densiy of the space ether in near earth space (remember Stan Deyos space blanket / solar tea cup explanation) works out that,
its approximately 3 x 10 ^8 mps which is WHY Einsteins special relativity theory e =mc^2 works pretty well in near earth space (So Einstein was only
alittle bit wrong whenit all comes down too it) BUT - as I've shown for it to be not a result of a false premise (twin paradox explanation) speed of
light C HAS to be infinity!
Heres a simple obervable proof of that statement.
Think of a black hole.
When light approaches the event horizon of a black hole(extremely energy dense part of that incompressible space fluid) its speed over ground (from
the cargoe ship explanation) can be zero even tho it might be travelling at lightspeed (3x10^8mps) ifit is heading into a energy density (current
waves and wind head on) travelling at 3 x 10^8mps the resultant speed over ground is 0
Hence - when energy density increases more toward the singularity at the center of the black hole, light speed (over ground) becomes negative
(infinity can have a negative value, infinitely large / infinitessimally small) and light speed becomes negative - and can't escape the contractive
(gravitic force) and we observe a black hole.
Soo
If we "went around the other side" of ablack hole - what would we observe?
Would it not be - all the light thats sucked into the black hole being radiated out again?... in effect a SUN?
Is not the dak side of any sun - the entrance of a back hole and vice versa?
Isn't that how space time curvature works and isn't that exactly what keeps our universe in equilibrium - balancing out the expansive energy spherical
sun - with its counterpart fractal tetrahedral gravitic / contractive force (black hole).
The wholetheory really is very simple and logical when you think about it all.
No lense bubblesandno square root of squares,no maxwell heaviside equations and so on.
Penny starting to drop at all yet?
I'm hoping it is starting too by now or - mabe I'm not doing this right!
Cheers
edit on 1/12/10 by ianmoone1 because: (no reason given)